Case Studies, Ethics, Philosophy, and Liberal Learning for the Management Profession
Rendtorff J.D.
2015
Journal of Management Education
37
10.1177/1052562914562282
Case studies can be an important methodology for ethics and philosophy in humanistic management and liberal education as well as in the social sciences because they integrate a deeper, reflective, philosophical, and ethical understanding of the organization. A case study approach based on philosophy of management contributes to putting into practice the Carnegie Foundation report Rethinking Undergraduate Education: Liberal Learning for the Profession. This approach is both inductive and deductive and very different from a soft Socratic approach to case studies such as the one often used in business schools following the Harvard method, wherein students are supposed to get knowledge through the reading of a case prepared by the teacher or from a business textbook. The aim of the case study is to analyze a concrete case and get general knowledge through the integrated analysis of the different ethical, philosophical, and economic dimensions of the case. This article presents an argument for case studies that highlight ethics and philosophy in the following parts: (1) Introduction, (2) Historical and Philosophical Definitions of Case Studies, (3) The Quality and Structure of the Case Study, (4) Scientific Validity of Case Studies, (5) Application and Use of Case Studies in Philosophy of Management and Ethics of Organizations, and (6) Conclusion. © The Author(s) 2014.
case studies; ethical issues in management education; ethical issues in management education; ethics; teaching methods and approaches
Colby A., Ehrlich T., Sullivan B., Dolle J., Rethinking undergraduate business education. Liberal learning for the profession, (2011); Damle C.S., The case method of instruction in management education: A critical review, Case method research and case method application: Selected papers of the Sixth International Conference on Case Method and Case Method Application; Filmer P., Philipson M., Silverman D., Walsh D., New directions in sociological theory, (1972); Flyvbjerg B., Rationalitet og Magt: Det konkretes videnskab, (1991); Flyvbjerg B., Rationalitet og Magt: Et case-baseret studie af planlægning, politik og modernitet, (1991); Gadamer H.G., Wahrheit und Methode, (1960); Griseri P., An introduction to the philosophy of management, (2013); Jonsen A.R., Toulmin S., The abuse of casuistry. A history of moral reasoning, (1989); Kant I., Kritik der Urteilskraft, (1991); Elements of philosophy of management and organization, (2010); Maesschalck M., Éthique des affaires et finalité de l’entreprise, (1999); Case histories in business ethics, (2002); Paine L.S., Cases in leadership, ethics and organizational integrity: A strategic perspective, (1997); Rendtorff J.D., (2009); Rendtorff J.D., Handbook of the philosophical foundations of business ethics, pp. 1361-1386, (2013); Richman N., Hermeneutics and case study research: What does German philosophy have to do with Harvard Business School?, Case method research and application: New vistas. Selected papers of the Sixth International Conference on Case Method and Case Method Application; Ricoeur P., Social Research, pp. 529-562, (1971); Velasquez M.G., Business ethics. Concept and cases, (2002); The case study anthology, (2004); Yin R.K., Qualitative research: From start to finish, (2010); Yin R.K., Applications of case study research: Design and methods, (2011)
SAGE Publications Inc.
Article
Scopus