CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

Committed to the honor code: An investment model analysis of academic integrity

Tác giả

Dix E.L.; Emery L.F.; Le B.

Năm xuất bản

2014

Source title

Social Psychology of Education

Số trích dẫn

16

DOI

10.1007/s11218-013-9246-2

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84896404460&doi=10.1007%2fs11218-013-9246-2&partnerID=40&md5=01992966ce514ab53e5ad4df8702352a

Tóm tắt

Educators worldwide face challenges surrounding academic integrity. The development of honor codes can promote academic integrity, but understanding how and why honor codes affect behavior is critical to their successful implementation. To date, research has not examined how students' relationship to an honor code predicts academic integrity. The present study examined a range of outcomes related to academic integrity and commitment to an honor code from the perspectives of Rusbult's (J Exp Soc Psychol 16,172-186, 1980) investment model and social norms. Students at a liberal arts college completed a questionnaire assessing honor code commitment, satisfaction, alternatives, investments, injunctive norms, descriptive norms, and three outcome behaviors: upholding the honor code, willingness to sacrifice for the honor code, and honor code involvement. Investments, satisfaction, and injunctive norms predicted honor code commitment, and both investments and commitment predicted all three self-reported outcomes. Honor code commitment mediated most associations between its predictor variables and the outcomes of interest. This study identifies a theoretical framework for understanding academic integrity through the lens of honor code commitment, and implications of these results for academic settings are discussed. In particular, investments and injunctive norms have broad relevance for creating values-driven school cultures. © 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.

Từ khóa

Academic integrity; Cheating; Commitment; Investment model; Social norms

Tài liệu tham khảo

Adams C.M., Forsyth P.B., Revisiting the trust effect in urban elementary schools, The Elementary School Journal, 114, pp. 1-21, (2013); Agnew C.R., Hoffman A.M., Lehmiller J.J., Duncan N.T., From the interpersonal to the international: Understanding commitment to the War on Terror, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, pp. 1559-1571, (2007); Arriaga X.B., Agnew C.R., Being committed: Affective, cognitive, and conative components of relationship commitment, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, pp. 1190-1203, (2001); Cialdini R.B., Reno R.R., Kallgren C.A., A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, pp. 1015-1026, (1990); Cohen J., Cohen P., West S.G., Aiken L.S., Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, (2003); Davis J.L., Le B., Coy A.E., Building a model of commitment to the natural environment to predict ecological behavior and willingness to sacrifice, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31, 3, pp. 257-265, (2011); Deutsch M., Gerard H.B., A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, pp. 629-636, (1955); Etcheverry P.E., Agnew C.R., Subjective norms and the prediction of relationship state and fate, Personal Relationships, 11, pp. 409-428, (2004); Etcheverry P.E., Agnew C.R., Romantic partner and friend influences on young adult cigarette smoking: Comparing close others' smoking and injunctive norms over time, Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 22, 3, pp. 313-325, (2008); Farrell D., Rusbult C.E., Exchange variables as predictors of job satisfaction, job commitment, and turnover: The impact of rewards, costs, alternatives, and investments, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 28, pp. 78-95, (1981); Forna A., Will a student lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do? US student honor codes forswearing cheating have proved effective, but Britain is way behind, The Guardian, (2012); Gialamas S., Educational institutions: Preparing young people to serve humanity, International Schools Journal, 32, pp. 66-70, (2012); Gino F., Ayal S., Ariely D., Contagion and differentiation in unethical behavior: The effect of one bad apple on the barrel, Psychological Science, 20, pp. 393-398, (2009); Goodfriend W., Agnew C.R., Sunken costs and desired plans: Examining different types of investments in close relationships, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, pp. 1639-1652, (2008); Hilbert G.A., Involvement of nursing students in unethical classroom and clinical behaviors, Journal of Professional Nursing, 1, pp. 230-234, (1985); Hu Z., Approved Community Code released to student body, The Gazelle, (2013); Hutton P.A., Understanding student cheating and what educators can do about it, College Teaching, 54, pp. 171-176, (2006); Jordan A.E., College student cheating: The role of motivation, perceived norms, attitudes, and knowledge of institutional policy, Ethics & Behavior, 11, pp. 233-247, (2001); Jurdi R., Hage H.S., Chow H.P.H., What behaviours do students consider academically dishonest? Findings from a survey of Canadian undergraduate students, Social Psychology of Education, 15, pp. 1-23, (2012); Larimer M.E., Neighbors C., Normative misperception and the impact of descriptive and injunctive norms on college student gambling, Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 17, 3, pp. 235-243, (2003); Le B., Agnew C.R., Commitment and its theorized determinants: A meta-analysis of the Investment Model, Personal Relationships, 10, pp. 37-57, (2003); Lepper M., Social control processes and the internationalization of social values: An attributional analysis, Social Cognition and Social Development, pp. 294-330, (1983); Li X., Petrick J.F., Examining the antecedents of brand loyalty from an investment model perspective, Journal of Travel Research, 47, pp. 25-34, (2008); Lucas G.M., Friedrich J., Individual differences in workplace deviance and integrity as predictors of academic dishonesty, Ethics & Behavior, 15, pp. 15-35, (2005); McCabe D.L., Trevino L.K., Academic dishonesty: Honor codes and other contextual influences, The Journal of Higher Education, 64, pp. 522-538, (1993); McCabe D.L., Trevino L.K., Individual and contextual influences on academic dishonesty: A multicampus investigation, Research in Higher Education, 38, pp. 379-396, (1997); McCabe D.L., Trevino L.K., Butterfield K.D., The influence of collegiate and corporate codes of conduct on ethics-related behavior in the workplace, Business Ethics Quarterly, 6, pp. 461-476, (1996); McCabe D.L., Trevino L.K., Butterfield K.D., Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research, Ethics & Behavior, 11, pp. 219-232, (2001); McCabe D.L., Trevino L.K., Butterfield K.D., Honor codes and other contextual influences on academic integrity: A replication and extension to modified honor code settings, Research in Higher Education, 43, pp. 357-378, (2002); McMurtrie B., Rapid growth occurs in establishment of international branch campuses, Chronicle of Higher Education, (2009); Murdock T.B., Anderman E.M., Motivational perspectives on student cheating: Toward an integrated model of academic dishonesty, Educational Psychologist, 41, pp. 129-145, (2006); Preacher K.J., Hayes A.F., Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models, Behavior Research Methods, 40, pp. 879-891, (2008); Roig M., Marks A., Attitudes toward cheating before and after the implementation of a modified honor code: A case study, Ethics & Behavior, 16, pp. 163-171, (2006); Rusbult C.E., Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, pp. 172-186, (1980); Rusbult C.E., Drigotas S.M., Verette J., The investment model: An interdependence analysis of commitment processes and relationship maintenance phenomena, Communication and Relational Maintenance, pp. 115-139, (1994); Rusbult C.E., Martz J.M., Agnew C.R., The investment model scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size, Personal Relationships, 5, pp. 357-391, (1998); Shepherd J., An idea worth imitating, The Guardian, (2007); Shu L.L., Gino F., Bazerman M.H., Dishonest deed, clear conscience: When cheating leads to moral disengagement and motivated forgetting, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, pp. 330-349, (2011); Snyder S., Bryn Mawr, Haverford Colleges rely on honor code to keep students honest, The Philadelphia Inquirer, (2012); Vandehey M.A., Diekhoff G.M., LaBeff E.E., College cheating: A twenty-year follow-up and the addition of an honor code, Journal of College Student Development, 48, pp. 468-480, (2007); Yakovchuk N., Badge J., Scott J., Staff and student perspectives on the potential of honour codes in the UK, International Journal for Educational Integrity, 7, pp. 37-52, (2011)

Nơi xuất bản

Kluwer Academic Publishers

Hình thức xuất bản

Article

Open Access

Nguồn

Scopus