CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
Wikipedia U: Knowledge, Authority, and Liberal Education in the Digital Age
Tác giả
Leitch T.
Năm xuất bản
2014
Source title
Wikipedia U: Knowledge, Authority, and Liberal Education in the Digital Age
Số trích dẫn
27
DOI
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
Since its launch in 2001, Wikipedia has been a lightning rod for debates about knowledge and traditional authority. It has come under particular scrutiny from publishers of print encyclopedias and college professors, who are skeptical about whether a crowd-sourced encyclopedia—most of whose entries are subject to potentially endless reviewing and editing by anonymous collaborators whose credentials cannot be established—can ever truly be accurate or authoritative. In Wikipedia U, Thomas Leitch argues that the assumptions these critics make about accuracy and authority are themselves open to debate. After all, academics are expected both to consult the latest research and to return to the earliest sources in their field, each of which has its own authority. And when teachers encourage students to master information so that they can question it independently, their ultimate goal is to create a new generation of thinkers and makers whose authority will ultimately supplant their own. Wikipedia U offers vital new lessons about the nature of authority and the opportunities and challenges of Web 2.0. Leitch regards Wikipedia as an ideal instrument for probing the central assumptions behind liberal education, making it more than merely, as one of its severest critics has charged, “the encyclopedia game, played online. © 2014 Johns Hopkins University Press. All rights reserved.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Newman J.H., The Idea of a University, (1996); General Education in a Free Society: Report of the Harvard Committee, pp. 47-146, (1950); Barzun J., The House of Intellect, (1959); Newman J.H., An Essay in Aid of a Grammar of Assent, pp. 273-274, (1870); Broudy H.S., Truth and Credibility: The Citizen’s Dilemma, (1981); Delbanco A., College: What It Was, Is, and Should Be, pp. 171-172, (2012); Keeling R.P., Hersh R.R., We’re Losing Our Minds: Rethinking American Higher Education, (2011); Menand L., The Marketplace of Ideas, (2001); Berube M., What’s Liberal about the Liberal Arts? Classroom Politics and “Bias” in Higher Education, (2006); Bok D., Universities in the Marketplace, (2003); Kernan A., The Death of Literature, (1990); Birkerts S., The Gutenberg Elegies: The Fate of Reading in an Electronic Age, (1994); Wikipedia, the People’s Encyclopedia, Los Angeles Times, (2013); Davidson C.N., Humanities 2.0: Promise, Perils, Predictions, PMLA, 123, 3; Burke K., Attitudes Toward History, (1984); Attitudes Toward History; Arum R., Roksa J., Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses, pp. 35-122, (2010); Kuh G.D., What We’re Learning about Student Engagement from NSSE: Benchmarks for Effective Educational Practices, Change, 35, 2; 7, pp. 1-12; 18, pp. 1-39; Weber M., Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, (1978); Economy and Society; De George R.T., The Nature and Limits of Authority, (1985); Watt E.D., Authority, (1982); Foley R., Egoism in Epistemology, Socializing Epistemology, (1994); Wrong D.H., Power: Its Forms, Bases, and Uses, (2002); Economy and Society; Selinger E., Crease R.P., The Philosophy of Expertise, (2006); Schachter-Shalomi Z., Miles-Yepez N., A Heart Afire: Stories and Teachings of the Early Hasidic Masters, (2009); Kuhn T., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, (1970); Fish S., Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities, (1980); Merton R.K., On the Shoulders of Giants: A Shandean Postscript, (1985); Merton R.K., On the Shoulders of Giants: A Shandean Postscript, pp. 267-269, (1985); Williams S., Free as in Freedom (2.0): Richard Stallman and the Free Software Revolution, (2011); Lih A., The Wikipedia Revolution: How a Bunch of Nobodies Created the World’s Greatest Encyclopedia, pp. 219-220, (2009); Cunningham W., Invitation to the Patterns List, (2013); Wikipedia Revolution; Lessig L., Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace, (1999); Wikipedia Revolution; Wikipedia Revolution, pp. 15-16; Wikipedia Revolution; Reagle J.M., Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia, (2010); Wikipedia Revolution, pp. 22-116; Wikipedia Revolution; Berners-Lee T., Information Management: A Proposal, (2013); Berners-Lee T., Worldwideweb: Proposal for a Hypertext Project, (2013); Berners-Lee T., Fischetti M., Weaving The Web: The Original Design and Ultimate Destiny of The World Wide Web by Its Inventor, pp. 20-34, (1999); Wikipedia Revolution, pp. 17-18; Havelock E.A., Preface to Plato, pp. 300-301, (1963); Ong W.J., Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of The Word, pp. 49-53, (1982); Gleick J., The Information: A History, A Theory, A Flood, pp. 35-41, (2011); Good Faith Collaboration; Information, pp. 382-383; Brown A., A Brief History of Encyclopedias: From Pliny to Wikipedia, (2011); Brief History of Encyclopedias; Brief History of Encyclopedias; Wikipedia: Why Wikipedia is So Great, (2013); Wikipedia: Why Wikipedia is Not So Great, (2013); Truth in Numbers? Everything, according to Wikipedia, (2010); Wikipedia: About, (2013); Sysop Status, (2013); Wikipedia: Becoming an Administrator, (2013); Wikipedia: Bureaucrats, (2013); Wikipedia: About, (2013); Stewards; Board of Trustees, (2013); Bylaws; Reagle J.M., Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia, (2010); O'Neil M., Cyberchiefs: Autonomy and Authority in Online Tribes, (2009); Cyberchiefs; Cyberchiefs; The Truth according to Wikipedia, (2008); Wikipedia: Featured Article Criteria, (2013); Wikipedia: Good Article Criteria, (2013); WP: Wikiproject Schools Assessment, (2013); (2013); Page S., Author Apologizes for Fake Wikipedia Biography, USA Today, (2005); CZ: Charter, (2013); Citizendium, (2013); Wikipedia: Core Content Policies, (2013); Wikipedia: Verifiability, (2013); Wikipedia: Core Content Policies.; Wikipedia: Core Content Policies.; An Introduction to Everything2, (2013); Sanger L., The Early History of Nupedia and Wikipedia: A Memoir, (2013); The Holocaust, (2013); Holocaust Denial, (2013); Wikipedia: No Original Research, (2013); Wikipedia: Researching with Wikipedia, (2013); Wikipedia: No Original Research.; Wales J., Original Research, (2013); Original Research, (2013); Richards M., Original Research, (2013); King S., Original Research, (2013); Original Research.; King S., NPOV and Credibility, (2013); Jay J.G., NPOV and Credibility, (2013); Jay J.G., NPOV and Credibility.; Richards M., NPOV and Credibility, (2013); Saintonge R., NPOV and Credibility, (2013); Fish S., Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities, (1980); NPOV and Credibility; Wikipedia: Neutral Point of View, (2012); NPOV and Credibility.; Reagle J.M., NPOV and Credibility, (2013); Reagle J.M., Open Communities, Media, Source, and Standards, (2013); Fox News, (2013); Van Parys T., Review: Film Adaptation and Its Discontents: From Gone with the Wind to The Passion of the Christ, Image and Narrative, 8, 3, (2007); Goggin J., Review: Simone Murray, Expanding the Discipline: The Adaptation Industry, Adaptation, 6, 1, pp. 128-131, (2013); Hutchins R.M., The Great Conversation, The Great Conversation: A Reader’s Guide to Great Books of the Western World, pp. 46-73, (1990); Fish S., No Bias, No Merit: The Case against Blind Submission, PMLA, 103, (1988); Kuhn T., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, (1970); Structure of Scientific Revolutions; Race, Class, Gender, What’s Liberal about Liberal Education? Classroom Politics and “Bias” in Higher Education, pp. 141-205, (2006); Structure of Scientific Revolutions; Jencks C., Riesman D., The Academic Revolution, (1968); The Marketplace of Ideas; Cerin S., Wikipedia: Pseudo-Encyclopedia of the Lie, Censorship, and Misinformation, (2011); (2013); Brandt D., Wikipedia Watch, (2013); Waters N.L., Why You Can’t Cite Wikipedia in My Class, Communications of the ACM, 50, 9, (2007); Gleick J., The Information: A History, A Theory, A Flood, pp. 380-381, (2011); Dinucci D., Fragmented Future, (2013); O'Reilly T., What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software, (2013); Lih A., Wikipedia as Participatory Journalism: Reliable Sources? Metrics for Evaluating Collaborative Media as a News Resource, Paper for the Fifth International Symposium on Online Journalism, (2004); Knight C., Pryke S., Wikipedia and the University, a Case Study, Teaching in Higher Education, 17, 6, (2012); Keen A., Web 2.0: The Second Generation of the Internet Has Arrived. It’s Worse Than You Think, Weekly Standard, (2006); Keen A., The Cult of the Amateur: How Today’s Internet is Killing Our Culture, (2007); The Truth according to Wikipedia, (2008); Marx K., The German Ideology, 5, (1976); The Cult of the Amateur; Wells J.M., The Circle of Knowledge: Encyclopedias past and Present, (1968); Reliability of Wikipedia, (2013); Giles J., Special Report: Internet Encyclopedias Go Head to Head, Nature, 438, 15, pp. 900-901, (2005); “Fatally Flawed: Refuting the Recent Study on Encyclopedic Accuracy in the Journal, (2013); O'Neil M., Cyberchiefs: Autonomy and Authority in Online Tribes, (2009); Encyclopaedia Britannica and Nature: A Response, (2012); Britannica Attacks and We Respond, Nature, 440, (2006); Nature, (2013); Information; Flanagin A.J., Metzger M.J., From Encyclopaedia Britannica to Wikipedia, Information, Communication and Society, 14, 3; Davis R.G., The Professors’ Lie, Columbia Forum, 1, (1972); Yung R.E., Et al., Biochemical Support for the ‘Threshold’ Theory of Creativity: A Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Study, Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 16, (2009); Lethem J., The Ecstasy of Influence: A Plagiarism, Harper’s, 312, 1881, (2007); Mark Twain’s Letters, 2, (1917); Emerson R.W., Letters and Social Aims, Emerson’s Complete Works, 8, (1895); Goldsmith K., Uncreative Writing: Managing Language in the Digital Age, (2011); Uncreative Writing; Web 2.0.; Democratic Party (United States), (2013); Democratic Party, (2013); Wikipedia: Neutral Point of View, (2013); Republican Party, (2012); Kimball R., Tenured Radicals: How Politics has Corrupted Our Higher Education, (2008); D'Souza D., Illiberal Education: The Politics of Race and Sex on Campus, (1991); Stross R., Anonymous Source Is Not the Same as Open Source, New York Times, (2006); Rheingold H., Net Smart: How to Thrive Online, (2012); Truth in Numbers? Everything, according to Wikipedia, (2010); Magnus P.D., On Trusting Wikipedia, Episteme, (2009); Truth according to Wikipedia; Fatally Flawed.; Hendren J., The Art of Wikigroaning, (2013); Donoghue F., The Last Professors: The Corporate University and The Fate of The Humanities, (2008); Cult of the Amateur, pp. 45-46; Truth according to Wikipedia; Rashdall H., The Universities of Eu Rope in the Middle Ages, (1895); Blair A., Thoughts on the Advertisement and Diffusion of Knowledge, Blackwood’s Magazine, 16, pp. 26-33, (1824); Yeo R., Encyclopaedic Visions: Scientific Dictionaries and Enlightenment Culture, (2001); Turner S., What Is the Problem with Experts?, Social Studies of Science, 31, 1, pp. 125-149; Selinger E., Crease R.P., The Philosophy of Expertise, (2006); Lih A., The Wikipedia Revolution: How a Bunch of Nobodies Created the World’s Greatest Encyclopedia, (2009); Wikipedia Revolution; Truth according to Wikipedia; McHenry R., The Faith-Based Encyclopedia, Ideas in Action, (2004); Pluto, Encyclopaedia Britannica; Professors Lie,”, pp. 7-15; Web 2.0.; Lanier J., You are Not A Gadget: A Manifesto, (2010); Carr N., The Shallows: What the Internet is Doing to Our Brains, (2010); Shallows; Zhu E., Hypermedia Interface Design: The Effects of Number of Links and Granularity of Nodes, Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 8, 3, pp. 331-358, (1999); Kelly K., Scan This Book!, The New York Times Magazine, (2006); Cult of the Amateur; Cult of the Amateur; Habermas J., (2006); Cult of the Amateur; Shirky C., A Speculative Post on the Idea of Algorithmic Authority, (2009); Web 2.0.; Rheingold H., Net Smart: How to Thrive Online, pp. 246-252, (2012); Keeling R.P., Hersh R.H., We’re Losing Our Minds: Rethinking American Higher Education; We’re Losing Our Minds; Campbell G., More on the Wikipedia Controversy, Gardner Writes, (2013); Vinall-Cox J., More on the Wikipedia Controversy, Gardner Writes, (2013); Doctorow C., Et al., OnDigital Maoism: The Hazards of the New Online Collectivism, by Jaron Lanier, Edge: The Reality Club, (2006); Boyd D., Information Access in a Networked World, (2007); Magnus P.D., On Trusting Wikipedia, Episteme, (2009); Walsh K.T., Historians Rank George W. Bush among Worst Presidents: Lincoln and Washington Were Rated as the Best, U.S. News and World Report, (2009); The Truth according to Wikipedia, (2008); Caillois R., Man, Play, and Games, pp. 9-10, (1961); Titcomb J., First Man to Make 1 million Wikipedia Edits, The Telegraph, (2012); Huizinga J., Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture, (1998); Man, Play, and Games, pp. 12-13; Gabriella Coleman E., Coding Freedom: The Ethics and Aesthetics of Hacking, (2013); Sutton-Smith B., The Ambiguity of Play, pp. 9-11, (1997); Wikipedia Community, (2013); Yang H.-L., Lai C.-Y., Motivations of Wikipedia Content Contributors, Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 6, pp. 1377-1383, (2010); Sanger L., The Early History of Nupedia and Wikipedia: A Memoir, (2013); Reagle J.M., Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia, (2010); Chaudhuri S., Editors Won’t Let It Be When It Comes to ‘the’ or ‘The’/Wonky Wikipedia Debate: Whether Beatles Article Merits Capital ‘T,’, The Wall Street Journal, (2012); Wikipedia: Edit Warring, (2013); Lih A., The Wikipedia Revolution: How a Bunch of Nobodies Created the World’s Greatest Encyclopedia, pp. 127-128, (2009); Yasseri T., Et al., Dynamics of Conflicts in Wikipedia, Plos One, (2013); Editors Survey 2011: Executive Summary, (2013); Wikipedia: Lamest Edit Wars, (2013); How to Win a Revert War, (2013); Ayers P., Matthews C., Yates B., How Wikipedia Works and How You Can Be a Part of It, (2008); Broughton J., Wikipedia: The Missing Manual, (2008); Wikipedia: School and University Projects, (2013); Shirky C., Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing without Organizations, (2008); Wikipedia: Own Ership of Articles, (2013); How Wikipedia Works; Chandler C.J., Gregory A.S., Sleeping with the Enemy: Wikipedia in the College Classroom, The History Teacher, 43, 2, (2010); Sleeping with the Enemy; Sleeping with the Enemy; Cummings R.E., Lazy Virtues: Teaching Writing in the Age of Wikipedia, (2009); Lazy Virtues; Lazy Virtues, pp. 16-20; Benkler Y., Coase’s Penguin, or Linux and the Nature of the Firm, Yale Law Journal, 112, 3, pp. 369-447, (2002); The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom, pp. 60-63, (2006); Lazy Virtues; Lazy Virtues, pp. 116-117; Lazy Virtues; Lazy Virtues; Lazy Virtues; Lazy Virtues; Forte A., Larco V., Bruckman A., Decentralization in Wikipedia Governance, Journal of Management Information Systems, 26, 1, pp. 49-72, (2009); Reagle J.M., Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia; Wikipedia: The Missing Manual, pp. 143-229; How Wikipedia Works, pp. 464-466; Burke K., Attitudes Toward History, pp. 171-1107, (1984); Hutchins R.M., The Great Conversation, The Great Conversation: A Reader’s Guide to Great Books of the Western World, pp. 48-49, (1990); Hardin G., The Tragedy of the Commons, Science, (1968); Benkler Y., The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom, (2006); Wealth of Networks; Wealth of Networks; Wikimedia Movement Strategic Plan Summary, (2013); Reagle J.M., Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia, (2010); Wikipedia: Reliable Sources,”, (2013); Wikimedia: Terms of Use/Paid Contributions Amendment, (2014); Wikipedia: Flagged Revisions, (2013); Wikipedia: Flagged Revisions/Reliable Revisions, (2013); O'Neil M., Cyberchiefs: Autonomy and Authority in Online Tribes, (2009); Lih A., The Wikipedia Revolution: How a Bunch of Nobodies Created the World’s Greatest Encyclopedia, (2009); Keen A., The Cult of the Amateur: How Today’s Internet is Killing Our Culture, pp. 186-189, (2007); Wikipedia Revolution; Animal Diversity Web, (2013); Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, (2013); Full Text of ‘Encyclopaedia Biblica: A Critical Dictionary of the Literary, Political, and Religious History, the Archaeology, Geography, and Natural History of the Bible, ”, (2013); Jewish Encyclopedia.Com, (2013); The Catholic Encyclopedia, (2013); Encyclopedia of Mormonism, (2013); The Encyclopedia of World Problems and Human Potential, (2013); Rocklopedia Fakebandica, (2013); Metapedia, (2013); Metapedia: Mission Statement, (2013); Baker N., The Charms of Wikipedia, The New York Review of Books, 55, 4, (2008); (2013); Brown A., A Brief History of Encyclopedias: From Pliny to Wikipedia, (2011); Graham P., Startup Ideas Wed like to Fund,”, (2013); Gleick J., Wikipedians Leave Cyberspace, Meet in Egypt, The Wall Street Journal, (2008); 5 Sterne Bei Wiki-Watch—Nach Welchen Kriterien Vergeben Wir Unsere Formale Bewertung?,”, (2013); (2013); Goals of Wikitrust, (2013); Anonymous on Fox11, (2013); Gee J.P., What Video Games have to Teach Us about Learning and Literacy, (2007); Johnson S., Everything Bad is Good for You: How Today’s Pop U Lar Culture is Actually Making Us Smarter, (2005); What Video Games have to Teach Us, pp. 221-222; Berners-Lee T., Fischetti M., Weaving The Web: The Original Design and Ultimate Destiny of The World Wide Web by Its Inventor, pp. 157-158, (1999); Wikidata, (2013); Wikipedia Revolution; Sano D., Twitter Creator Jack Dorsey Illuminates the Site’s Founding Document, Part I, Los Angeles Times, (2009); Terms of Use, (2014); Sengupta S., Facebook’s Prospects May Rest on Trove of Data, New York Times, (2012); Derrida J., Structure, Sign, and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences, Writing and Difference, pp. 279-280, (1978); Ingram M., What Wikipedia Can Tell Us about the Future of News, (2012); About Reddit, (2014); Tragedy of the Commons; Svensson P., The Landscape of Digital Humanities, Digital Humanities Quarterly, 4, 1, (2010); Landscape of Digital Humanities; McPherson T., Introduction: Media Studies and the Digital Humanities, Cinema Journal, 48, 2, pp. 119-123, (2009); Landscape of Digital Humanities, pp. 86-87; Kirschenbaum M.G., What Is Digital Humanities and What’s It Doing in English Departments?, ADE Bulletin, 150, (2010); (2013); Silver D., Introduction: Where Is Internet Studies?, Critical Cyberculture Studies, (2006); Jenkins H., Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide, (2006); Reagle J.M., Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia, (2010); Bishop B., Cushing R.G., The Big Sort: Why the Clustering of Like-Minded America is Tearing Us Apart, (2008); Keen A., Web 2.0: The Second Generation of the Internet Has Arrived. It’s Worse Than You Think, Weekly Standard, (2006); Shirky C., Old Revolutions, Good New Revolutions, Bad, Encyclopaedia Britannica Blog, (2007); Cyberchiefs; Wikipedia Revolution; Truth in Numbers? Everything, according to Wikipedia, (2010); Wealth of Networks; Net Smart
Nơi xuất bản
Johns Hopkins University Press
Hình thức xuất bản
Book
Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus