CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
Why is liberal education so incoherent? An anthropological perspective
Tác giả
Graber R.B.
Năm xuất bản
2014
Source title
On the Horizon
Số trích dẫn
1
DOI
10.1108/OTH-09-2013-0030
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
Purpose: This paper's purpose is to account for liberal education's characteristic incoherence. Design/methodology/approach: Its approach is to sketch a dilemma created by cultures being inherently conservative, while nations, in order to be internationally competitive, need to be innovative. The definitional and systemic bases of culture's conservatism offer no point of attack; but a third base is enculturation, which does. Findings: Shortly after puberty, society's more promising young people are strongly urged to leave home for an extended period, and be exposed to ways of acting and thinking that often clash with how they have been brought up. They are encouraged to explore new subjects and indulge their curiosity; they are encouraged to "think outside the box" of their own enculturation. The incoherence of liberal education leaves them not with a sense of closure, but in a state of constructive confusion conducive to innovation in all aspects of life. Liberal education thus serves the social function of countering the anti-innovative tendency of culture. Practical implications: Attempts to impose coherence on undergraduate educational experience by "tying things all together" for students are ill-advised. Originality/value: Seeing incoherence as a desirable rather than deplorable feature of undergraduate liberal education can help us facilitate rather than inadvertently inhibit innovative thought and action in the rising generation. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Từ khóa
Cultural conservatism; Enculturation; Innovative imperative; International competition; Liberal education; Replication vs innovation
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bacon R., The Opus Majus of Roger Bacon, 2, (1962); Flexner A., The usefulness of useless knowledge, Harper's Magazine, 179, June, pp. 544-552, (1939); Graber R.B., Valuing Useless Knowledge: An Anthropological Inquiry into the Meaning of Liberal Education; Harris M., Cows, Pigs, Wars, and Witches: The Riddles of Culture; Hempel C.G., The logic of functional analysis, Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science, pp. 297-330; Hursh B., Haas P., Moore M., An interdisciplinary model to implement general education, Journal of Higher Education, 54, 1, pp. 42-59, (1983); Ingold T., Evolution and Social Life, (1986); Johnson S., Who Moved My Cheese? An Amazing Way to Deal with Change in Your Work and in Your Life, (1998); Kaplan A., The Conduct of Inquiry: Methodology for Behavioral Science; Kennedy P., The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000; Kroeber A.L., Kluckhohn C., Culture: A Critical Review of Concepts and Definitions, (1952); Linton R., The Study of Man: An Introduction, (1936); Marklein M.B., Going away to college (far away), USA Today, 17 July, (2013); Mead M., Cooperation and Competition among Primitive Peoples, (1937); Nagel E., A formalization of functionalism, Logic Without Metaphysics, pp. 247-283, (1956); Rappaport R., Pigs for the Ancestors: Ritual in the Ecology of a New Guinea People, (1967); Spencer H., Principles of Sociology, 2, (1897); Tylor E.B., Primitive Culture: Researches into the Development of Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Art, and Custom, 2, (1871)
Nơi xuất bản
Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.
Hình thức xuất bản
Review
Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus