How the instructional and learning environments of liberal arts colleges enhance cognitive development
Pascarella E.T.; Wang J.-S.; Trolian T.L.; Blaich C.
2013
Higher Education
44
10.1007/s10734-013-9622-z
This study analyzes longitudinal data from 17 four-year institutions in the United States to determine how the distinctive instructional and learning environment of American liberal arts colleges accounts for the positive impact of liberal arts college attendance on four-year growth in critical thinking skills and need for cognition. We find that, net of important confounding influences, attending an American liberal arts college (vs. a research university or a regional institution in the United States) increases one's overall exposure to clear and organized classroom instruction and enhances one's use of deep approaches to learning. In turn, clear and organized classroom instruction and deep approaches to learning tend to facilitate growth in both critical thinking and need for cognition-thus indirectly transmitting the impact of attending a liberal arts college. © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
Cognition; Critical thinking; Liberal arts colleges; Wabash National Study
CAAP Technical Handbook, (1991); Arum R., Roksa J., Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses, (2011); Astin A., What Matters in College? Four Critical Years Revisited, (1993); Astin A., How the liberal arts college affects students, Daedalus, 128, 1, pp. 77-100, (1999); Cacioppo J., Petty R., Feinstein J., Jarvis W., Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life of individuals differing in need for cognition, Psychological Bulletin, 119, pp. 197-253, (1996); Chickering A., Reisser L., Education and Identity, (1993); Clark B., The Distinctive College, (1970); Edison M., Doyle S., Pascarella E., Dimensions of teaching effectiveness and their impact on student cognitive development, (1998); Elias S., Loomis R., Utilizing need for cognition and perceived self-efficacy to predict academic performance, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, pp. 217-225, (2002); Evans C., Kirby J., Fabrigar L., Approaches to learning, need for cognition, and strategic flexibility among university students, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, pp. 507-528, (2003); Hines C., Cruickshank D., Kennedy J., Teacher clarity and its relationship to student achievement and satisfaction, American Educational Research Journal, 22, pp. 87-99, (1985); Jessup-Anger J., Examining how residential environments inspire the life of the mind, Review of Higher Education, 35, pp. 431-462, (2012); King P., Kendall Brown M., Lindsay N., VanHecke J., Liberal arts student learning outcomes: An integrated approach, About Campus, 12, 4, pp. 2-9, (2007); Koblik S., Graubard S., Distinctly American: The residential liberal arts college, (2000); Leslie D., Resolving the dispute: Teaching is academe's core value, Journal of Higher Education, 73, pp. 49-73, (2002); Loes C., Pascarella E., Umbach P., Effects of diversity experiences on critical thinking skills: Who benefits?, Journal of Higher Education, 83, pp. 1-25, (2012); Nelson Laird T., Shoup R., Kuh G., Measuring deep approaches to learning using the National Survey of Student Engagement, (2006); Nelson Laird T., Garver A., Niskode-Dossett A., Banks J., The predictive validity of a measure of deep approaches to learning, (2008); Nelson Laird T., Shoup R., Kuh G., Schwartz M., The effects of discipline on deep approaches to student learning and college outcomes, Research in Higher Education, 49, pp. 469-494, (2008); Nelson Laird T., Seifert T., Pascarella E., Mayhew M., Blaich C., Deeply affecting first-year students thinking: The effects of deep approaches to learning on three outcomes, (2011); Pascarella E., College environmental influences on learning and cognitive development: A critical review and synthesis, Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, 1, pp. 1-61, (1985); Pascarella E., Bohr L., Nora A., Terenzini P., Cognitive effects of 2-year and 4-year colleges: New evidence, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17, pp. 83-96, (1995); Pascarella E., Cruce T., Wolniak G., Blaich C., Do liberal arts colleges really foster good practices in undergraduate education?, Journal of College Student Development, 45, pp. 57-74, (2004); Pascarella E., Edison M., Nora A., Hagedorn L., Braxton J., Effects of teacher organization/preparation and teacher skill/clarity on general cognitive skills in college, Journal of College Student Development, 37, pp. 7-19, (1996); Pascarella E., Salisbury M., Blaich C., Exposure to effective instruction and college student persistence: A multi-institutional replication and extension, Journal of College Student Development, 52, pp. 4-19, (2011); Pascarella E., Terenzini P., How College Affects Students: Findings and Insights from Twenty Years of Research, (1991); Pascarella E., Terenzini P., How College Affects Students: A Third Decade of Research, 2, (2005); Pascarella E., Wolniak G., Seifert T., Cruce T., Blaich C., Liberal Arts Colleges and Liberal Arts Education: New Evidence on Impacts, (2005); Raudenbush S.W., Bryk A.S., Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods, (2001); Schonwetter D., Menec V., Perry R., An empirical comparison of two effective college teaching behaviors: Expressiveness and organization, (1995); Seifert T., Pascarella E., Goodman K., Salisbury M., Blaich C., Liberal arts colleges and good practices in undergraduate education: Additional evidence, Journal of College Student Development, 51, pp. 1-22, (2010); Weimer M., Lenze L., Instructional interventions: Review of the literature on efforts to improve instruction, Effective Teaching in Higher Education: Research and Practice, (1997)
Article
Scopus