CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
Evaluating student understanding of core concepts in computer architecture
Tác giả
Porter L.; Garcia S.; Tseng H.-W.; Zingaro D.
Năm xuất bản
2013
Source title
Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE
Số trích dẫn
23
DOI
10.1145/2462476.2462490
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
Many studies have demonstrated that students tend to learn less than instructors expect in CS1. In light of these studies, a natural question is: to what extent do these results hold for subsequent, upper-division computer science courses? In this paper we describe our work in creating high-level concept questions for an upper-division computer architecture course. The questions were designed and agreed upon by subject-matter and teaching experts to measure desired minimum proficiency of students post-course. These questions were administered to four separate computer architecture courses at two different institutions: a large public university and a small liberal arts college. Our results show that students in these courses were indeed not learning as much as the instructors expected, performing poorly overall: the per-question average was only 56%, with many questions showing no statistically significant improvement from pre-course to post-course. While these results follow the trend from CS1 courses, they are still somewhat surprising given that the courses studied were taught using research-based pedagogy that is known to be effective across the CS curriculum. We discuss implications of our findings and offer possible future directions of this work. Copyright 2013 ACM.
Từ khóa
Assessment; Computer architecture; Curriculum
Tài liệu tham khảo
Asanovic K., Bodik R., Catanzaro B.C., Gebis J.J., Husbands P., Keutzer K., Patterson D.A., Plishker W.L., Shalf J., Williams S.W., Yelick K.A., The landscape of parallel computing research: A view from Berkeley, Technical Report Technical Report No. UCB/EECS-2006-183, (2006); Crouch C.H., Watkins J., Fagen A.P., Mazur E., Peer instruction: Engaging students one-on-one, all at once, Research-Based Reform of University Physics. American Association of Physics Teachers, (2007); Goldman K., Gross P., Heeren C., Herman G.L., Kaczmarczyk L., Loui M.C., Zilles C., Setting the scope of concept inventories for introductory computing subjects, Trans. Comput. Educ., 10, 2, pp. 1-29, (2010); Herman G.L., Loui M.C., Zilles C., Creating the digital logic concept inventory, Proc. of the 41st SIGCSE, (2010); Lister R., Adams E.S., Fitzgerald S., Fone W., Hamer J., Lindholm M., McCartney R., Mostrom J.E., Sanders K., Seppala O., Simon B., Thomas L., A multi-national study of reading and tracing skills in novice programmers, ITiCSE-WGR '04: Working Group Reports from ITiCSE, (2004); Patterson D.A., Hennessy J.L., Computer Organization and Design: The Hardware/software Interface, (2008); Porter L., Bailey-Lee C., Simon B., Zingaro D., Peer instruction: Do students really learn from peer discussion in computing?, Proc. of the 7th ICER, (2011); Robins A., Haden P., Garner S., Problem distributions in a CS1 course, Proc. of the 8th ACE, (2006); Schulte C., Bennedsen J., What do teachers teach in introductory programming?, Proc of the 2nd ICER, (2006); Sheard J., Carbone A., Lister R., Simon B., Thompson E., Whalley J.L., Going solo to assess novice programmers, Proc. of the 13th ITiCSE, (2008); Sutter H., The free lunch is over: A fundamental turn toward concurrency in software, Dr. Dobb's Journal, 30, (2005); Tew A.E., Guzdial M., Developing a validated assessment of fundamental CS1 concepts, Proc. of the 41st SIGCSE, (2010); Tew A.E., Guzdial M., The fcs1: A language independent assessment of cs1 knowledge, Proc. of the 42nd SIGCSE, (2011)
Nơi xuất bản
Hình thức xuất bản
Conference paper
Open Access
All Open Access; Green Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus