Reconstructing a lost tradition: The philosophy of medical education in an age of reform
Martin C.
2013
Medical Education
10
10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04262.x
Context At the 100th anniversary of Abraham Flexner's landmark report on medical education, critical reassessment of the direction of medical education reform evinced valuable interdisciplinary contributions from biomedicine, sociology, psychology and education theory. However, to date, philosophy has been absent from the discussion despite its long standing contribution to studies on education in other professions. Methods This discussion paper examines how the philosophical tradition can contribute to scholarship in medical education. It begins with an explanation of the scholarly tradition of philosophy of education and its role in thinking in education more generally. It then makes links between this tradition and the context of medical education in the Flexner era of education reform. The paper then argues that this tradition is necessary to the understanding of medical education reform post-Flexner and that doctors must benefit from an education derived from this tradition in order to be able to carry out their work. Discussion These foundations are characterised as a hidden, but always present, tradition in medical education. Two ways in which this 'lost tradition' can inform medical education theory and practice are identified: firstly, by the establishment of a public canon of medical education texts that express such a tradition, and, secondly, by the incorporation of a variety of 'signature pedagogies' exemplary of liberal education. © 2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Flexner A., Medical Education in the United States and Canada: A Report to the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, (1910); Peters R.S., White J., The philosopher's contribution to educational research, Educ Philos Theor, 1, pp. 1-15, (1969); Bridges D., Philosophy and educational research: a reconsideration of epistemological boundaries, Camb J Educ, 27, pp. 177-189, (1997); Pring R., The virtues and vices of an educational researcher, J Philos Educ, 35, pp. 407-421, (2001); Bridges D., Watts M., Educational research and policy: epistemological considerations, J Philos Educ, 42, SUPPL. 1, pp. 41-62, (2008); Clark C., Education(al) research, educational policy-making and practice, J Philos Educ, 45, pp. 37-57, (2011); Peters R.S., Ethics and Education, (1966); Pellegrino E.D., Professionalism, profession and the virtues of the good physician, Mt Sinai J Med, 69, pp. 378-384, (2002); Weatherall D., Science and medical education: is it time to revisit Flexner?, Med Educ, 45, pp. 44-50, (2011); Irby D., Cooke M., O'Brien B., Calls for reform of medical education by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching: 1910 and 2010, Acad Med, 85, pp. 220-227, (2010); Foss L., The challenge to biomedicine: a foundations perspective, J Med Philos, 14, pp. 165-191, (1989); McManus I.S., Humanity and the medical humanities, Lancet, 346, pp. 1143-1145, (1995); Oakeshott M., The Voice of Liberal Learning, (2000); Miller A., Rhetoric, paideia and the old idea of a liberal education, J Philos Educ, 41, pp. 183-206, (2007); Andre J., Brody H., Fleck L., Thomason C.L., Tomlinson T., Ethics, professionalism, and humanities at Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Acad Med, 78, pp. 968-972, (2003); Arnold R.M., Povar G.J., Howell J.D., The humanities, humanistic behaviour, and the humane physician: a cautionary note, Ann Intern Med, 106, pp. 313-318, (1987); Evans D., Values in Medicine: What are We Really Doing to Our Patients?, (2009); Stempsey W., The quarantine of philosophy in medical education: why teaching the humanities may not produce humane physicians, Med Health Care Philos, 2, pp. 3-9, (1999); Strike K., Soltis J., The Ethics of Teaching, (2004); White J., The Aims of Education Restated, (1982); Feinberg W., Soltis J., School and Society, (1985); Zelenka M., The Educational Philosophy of Abraham Flexner: Creating Cogency in Medical Education, (2008); Lee S.S., Signature pedagogies in the professions, Daedalus, 134, pp. 52-59, (2005); Lee S.S., Pedagogies of uncertainty, Lib Learn, 91, pp. 18-25, (2005)
Article
Scopus