CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
Including Multiple Voices in Collaboratively Designing a Teacher Education Program
Tác giả
Konecki L.R.; Sturdivant R.L.; King C.M.; Melin J.A.; Lancaster P.E.
Năm xuất bản
2012
Source title
Action in Teacher Education
Số trích dẫn
0
DOI
10.1080/01626620.2012.729482
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
This narrative case study describes the collaborative processes employed by a midwestern university as it designed and implemented a clinically based, postbaccalaureate teacher preparation program for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) graduates committed to teaching in high need secondary schools. The program development team included 13 public school educators drawn from three partner districts, seven educators from the college of education, six representatives from STEM disciplines within the college of liberal arts and sciences, the engineering dean, along with foundation and state department of education observers. Throughout the intense program development process, the diverse team members challenged assumptions and traditions as they considered options and gained consensus on the design of the program. Participants reported that they valued the collaborative nature of the processes and the respect given to all team members. The program itself is still in the implementation phase, thus, its efficacy remains unclear although initial indicators suggest that it has promise. © 2012, Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Teacher Performance Assessment Consortium, (2010); Assaf L.C., Garza R., Battle J., Multicultural teacher education: Examining the perceptions, practices, and coherence in one teacher preparation program, Teacher Education Quarterly, 37, 2, pp. 115-135, (2010); Ball D.L., Forzani F.M., Teaching skillful teaching, Educational Leadership, 68, 4, pp. 40-45, (2010); Cochran-Smith M., Power C., New directions for teacher preparation, Educational Leadership, 67, 8, pp. 6-13, (2010); Committee on the Study of Teacher Preparation Programs in the United States, Preparing teachers: Building evidence for sound practice, (2010); Council of Chief State School Officers, Interstate teacher assessment and support consortium (InTASC) Model core teaching standards: A resource for state dialogue, (2011); Darling-Hammond L., Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Seattle, WA: University of Washington, Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, (1999); Diez M.E., It is complicated: Unpacking the flow of teacher education's impact on student learning, Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 5, pp. 441-450, (2010); Delpit L., Lessons from teachers, Journal of Teacher Education, 57, 3, pp. 220-231, (2006); Duncan A., Teacher Preparation: Reforming the Uncertain Profession, (2009); Fairbanks C.A., Duffy G.G., Faircloth B.S., He Y., Levin B., Rohr J., Stein C., Beyond knowledge: Exploring why some teachers are more thoughtfully adaptive than others, Journal of Teacher Education, 61, pp. 161-171, (2010); Feiman-Nemser S., Schwille S., Carver C., Yusko B., A conceptual review of literature on new teacher induction, (1999); Golas J., Effective teacher preparation programs: Bridging the gap between educational technology availability and its utilization, International Form of Teaching and Studies, 6, 1, pp. 16-18, (2010); Hess F.M., Revitalizing teacher education by revisiting our assumptions about teaching, Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 5, pp. 450-457, (2009); Hoover L.A., Comprehensive teacher induction: A vision toward transformative teacher learning, Action in Teacher Education, 32, 4, pp. 15-25, (2010); Hughes J.A., What teacher preparation programs can do to better prepare teachers to meet the challenges of educating students living in poverty, Action Teacher Education, 32, 1, pp. 54-64, (2010); Johnson L.S., Targeted comprehensive induction for urban educators: An exploration of teacher motivation and retention, The New Educator, 7, 2, pp. 131-152, (2011); Knight J., Instructional coaching, School Administrator, 63, 4, pp. 36-41, (2006); Levine A., Teacher education must respond to changes in America, Phi Delta Kappan, 92, 2, pp. 19-24, (2010); Levine A., The new normal of teacher education, Chronicle of Higher Education, 57, 36, pp. 1-9, (2011); Michigan State Board of Education, Professional standards for Michigan teachers (PMST), (2008); Morrison G.R., Ross S.M., Kemp J.E., Designing effective instruction, (2007); National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education, Professional standards for the accreditation of teacher preparation institutions, (2008); Transforming Teacher Education through Clinical Practice: a National Strategy to Prepare Effective Teachers, (2010); NCATE/NCTM Program Standards (2003) Programs for Initial Preparation of Mathematics Teachers, (2003); NCATE/NCTM Program Standards Revision draft—Secondary (4–10–12), (2012); Standards for Science Teacher Preparation, (2003); NSTA Standards for Science Teacher Preparation, (2011); Obama B., State of the Union Address, (2011); Robertson-Kraft C., Duckworth A.L., True grit: Trait-level perseverance and passion for long-term goals predicts effectiveness and retention among novice teachers, (2012); Rose D.H., Gravel J.W., Universal design for learning, International encyclopedia of education, pp. 119-124, (2010); Shulman L.S., Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching, Educational Researcher, 15, 2, pp. 4-14, (1986); Tyler R.W., Basic principles of curriculum and instruction, (1969); Wiggins G., McTighe J., Understanding by design, (1998); Wiggins G., McTighe J., Understanding by design, (2005)
Nơi xuất bản
Routledge
Hình thức xuất bản
Article
Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus