Addressing Common Student Errors With Classroom Voting in Multivariable Calculus
Cline K.; Parker M.; Zullo H.; Stewart A.
2012
PRIMUS
11
10.1080/10511970.2012.697098
One technique for identifying and addressing common student errors is the method of classroom voting, in which the instructor presents a multiple-choice question to the class, and after a few minutes for consideration and small group discussion, each student votes on the correct answer, often using a hand-held electronic clicker. If a large number of students have voted for one particular incorrect answer, the instructor can recognize and address the issue. In order to identify multiple-choice questions which are especially effective at provoking common errors, we recorded the percentages of students voting for each option on each question used in 11 sections of multivariable calculus, taught by four instructors, at two small liberal arts institutions, all drawing from the same collection of 317 classroom voting questions, over the course of 5 years, during which we recorded the results of 1,038 class votes. We found six questions in which, on average, more than 50% of each class voted for the same incorrect answer. Here we present these six questions and we discuss how we used them in the classroom in order to promote discussion and student learning. © 2013 Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
classroom voting; Multivariable calculus; peer instruction
Bode M., Drane D., Kolikant Y.B., Schuller M., A clicker approach to teaching calculus, Notices of the American Mathematical Society., 56, 2, pp. 253-256, (2009); Bruff D., Teaching With Classroom Response Systems: Creating Active Learning Environments, (2009); Cline K., Zullo H., VonEpps L., Classroom voting patterns in differential calculus, PRIMUS, 22, 1, pp. 43-59, (2011); Graham C., Tripp T., Seawright L., Joeckell G., Empowering or compelling reluctant participators using audience response systems, Active Learning in Higher Education., 8, 3, pp. 233-258, (2007); Hughes-Hallett D., Gleason A.M., Flath D.E., Gordon S.P., Lock P.F., Lomen D.O., Lovelock D., Mumford D., McCallum W.G., Osgood B.G., Pasquale A., Quinney D., Raskind W., Rhea K., Tecosky-Feldman J., Calculus, Single and Multivariable, third edition, (2002); Lasry N., Mazur E., Watkins J., Peer instruction: From Harvard to the two-year college, American Journal of Physics., 76, 11, pp. 1066-1069, (2008); Lucas A., Using peer instruction and I-Clickers to enhance student participation in calculus, PRIMUS., 19, 3, pp. 219-231, (2009); MacArthur J.R., Jones L., A review of literature reports of clickers applicable to college chemistry classrooms, Chemistry Education Research and Practice., 9, 3, pp. 187-195, (2008); Miller R.L., Santana-Vega E., Terrell M.S., Can good questions and peer discussion improve calculus instruction?, PRIMUS., 16, 3, pp. 193-203, (2006); Pilzer S., Robinson M., Lomen D., Flath D., Hughes Hallet D., Lahme B., Morris J., McCallum W., Thrash J., ConcepTests - To Accompany Calculus, third edition, (2003); Schlatter M., Writing ConcepTests for a multivariable calculus course, PRIMUS., 12, 4, pp. 305-314, (2002); Simpson V., Oliver M., Electronic voting systems for lectures then and now: A comparison of research and practice, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology., 23, 2, pp. 187-208, (2007); Smith M.K., Wood W.B., Adams W.K., Wieman C., Knight J.K., Gulid N., Su T.T., Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions, Science., 323, 5910, pp. 122-124, (2009); Trees A., Jackson M., The learning environment in clicker classrooms: Student processes of learning and involvement in large university-level courses using student response systems, Learning, Media, and Technology., 32, 1, pp. 21-40, (2007); Zullo H., Cline K., Parker M., Buckmire R., George J., Gurski K., Larsen J., Mellor B., Oberweiser J., Peterson D., Spindler R., Stewart A., Storm C., Student surveys: What do they think?, MAA Notes: Teaching Mathematics with Classroom Voting, (2011)
Article
Scopus