Reference Services Review: Content analysis, 2006-2011
Mahraj K.
2012
Reference Services Review
7
10.1108/00907321211228237
The purpose of this paper is to present a retrospective analysis of the content published in Reference Services Review from 2006 through 2011. The author manually reviewed the content of all journal issues from 2006 through 2011 using the Emerald web site. The information reviewed was number of articles per issue; author affiliations; article format; and article titles, abstracts, and keywords. The type, size, and location of author institutions were confirmed using institutions' official web sites as necessary. The paper finds that Reference Services Review has published an average of 40 articles per year. The majority of articles focus on topics in information literacy and reference services, with consistent coverage of emerging technologies, working with diverse populations, library space, and management. The majority of contributors are affiliated with large academic institutions in the USA, with some representation from liberal arts colleges, public libraries, community colleges, and international authors. This analysis consolidates data on the volume, focus, and authorship of Reference Services Review as the journal reaches its 41st year of publication. The data provide a snapshot of trends in the field's professional and scholarly literature with implications for trends in academic librarianship. © 2012, Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Content analysis; Journal articles; Periodicals; Publications
Standards for Libraries in Higher Education, (2011); Berelson B., Content Analysis in Communication Research, (1952); Reference Services Review: editorial objectives; Reference Services Review: volume list; Ishimura Y., Bartlett J., Information literacy courses in LIS schools: emerging perspectives for future education, Education for Information, 27, 4, pp. 197-216, (2009); Jarvelin K., Vakkari P., The evolution of library and information science 1965-1985: a content analysis of journal articles, Information Processing and Management, 29, 1, pp. 129-144, (1993); Kloda L., Koufogiannakis D., Mallan K., Transferring evidence in practice: what evidence summaries of library and information studies research tell practitioners, Information Research, 16, 1, (2011); Krippendorff K., Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology, (2004); Palmquist M., Content analysis; Palmquist M., Writing guide: content analysis; Palmquist M., Bibliometrics; Rochester M., Library and information science research in Australia 1985-1994: a content analysis of research articles in the Australian Library Journal and Australian Academic and Research Libraries, Australian Academic and Research Libraries, 26, 3, pp. 163-170, (1995); Rockman I., Reflections on our work, Reference Services Review, 24, 1, pp. 10-11, (2006); Shachaf P., A global perspective on library association codes of ethics, Library and Information Science Review, 27, 4, pp. 513-533, (2005); Thelwall M., Bibliometrics to webometrics, Journal of Information Science, 34, 4, pp. 605-621, (2008)
Article
Scopus