Discourse markers in college English listening instruction: An empirical study of Chinese learners
Zhang J.
2012
English Language Teaching
6
10.5539/elt.v5n3p46
Discourse markers can clearly indicate the organization of discourse, remind the hearer of the preceding and the following contents, and express clearly the concrete speech acts. The aims of this study are to explore the relationship between the discourse-marker-based model and listening comprehension as well as the different effects of such a kind of instruction on liberal arts and science students. 120 Chinese college students of non-English major, who are from two different departments of Xi'an University of Science and Technology, are the research subjects. An experiment has been carried out by applying the theory of discourse markers to enhance the English listening skill proficiency. Based on the results of the data analysis, the conclusion can be drawn that discourse-marker-based listening instruction can improve students' listening comprehension of non-English major and liberal arts students benefit more from discourse-marker-based listening instruction.
College English listening instruction; Discourse markers; Listening comprehension
Aijmer K., English Discourse Particles-Evidence from a Corpus, (2002); Andersen G., Pragmatic Makers and Sociolinguistic Variation: A Relevance-theoretic Approach to the Language of Adolescents., (2001); Anderson A., Lynch A., Listening., (1988); Anderson E.S., Brizuela M., Dupuy B., Gonnerman L., Cross-linguistic evidence for the early acquisition of discourse markers as register variable, Journal of Pragmatics, 31, pp. 1339-1351, (1999); Bazanella C., Phatic connectives as interactional cues in contemporary spoken Italian, Journal of Pragmatics, 14, pp. 629-647, (2000); Paul B., A speech act theory of metadiscourse, Written Communication, 61, pp. 157-165, (1999); Blakemore D., Constraint on Relevance., (1987); Blakemore D., Understanding Utterance., (1992); Blakemore D., Are apposition markers discourse markers, Journal of Linguistics, 32, pp. 325-347, (1996); Brown G., Listening to Spoken English., (1990); Brown G., Yule J., Discourse Analysis., (1983); Chaudron C., Richards J.C., The effect of discourse markers on the comprehension of lectures, Applied Linguistics, 7, pp. 20-35, (1996); Chen Y., He W., Dui bu dui as a pragmatic discourse, Journal of Pragmatics, 33, pp. 1441-1465, (2001); Crisemore A., Metadiscourse and discourse process: Interaction and issues, Discourse Process, 13, pp. 191-205, (1990); Dunkel P.A., Listening in the native and second/foreign language: Toward an integration of research and practice, TESOL Quarterly, 25, 3, pp. 431-457, (2001); Erman B., Pragmatic markers revisited with a focus on you know in adult and adolescent talk, Journal of Pragmatics, 31, pp. 1337-1359, (2001); Field J., Skill and strategies: Towards a new methodology for listening, ELT Journal, 52, 2, pp. 110-118, (1998); Fraser B., Types of English discourse markers, Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 38, 4, pp. 19-33, (1988); Fraser B., An approach to discourse markers, Journal of Pragmatics, 14, pp. 383-395, (1990); Fraser B., What are discourse markers?, Journal of Pragmatics, 31, pp. 931-952, (1999); Fuller J.M., The influence of speaker role on discourse markers use, Journal of Pragmatics, 35, pp. 23-45, (2003); Halliday, Hassan, Cohesion in English, (1976); Hansen M., Alors and donc in spoken French: A reanalysis, Journal of Pragmatics, 28, pp. 153-187, (1997); Hellermann J., Language which is not taught: The discourse marker use of beginning adult learners of English, Journal of Pragmatics, 1, pp. 157-179, (2007); Jucker A., Ziv Y., Discourse Markers: Description and Theory., (1998); Knott A., Sanders T., The classification of coherence relations and their linguistic markers: An exploration of two languages, Journal of Pragmatics, 30, pp. 135-175, (1998); Krashen S., Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition, (1982); Macaulay R., You know, it depends, Journal of Pragmatics, 34, pp. 749-767, (2002); Norrick N.R., Discourse markers in oral narrative, Journal of Pragmatics, 35, pp. 849-878, (2002); O'Malley J.M., Chamot A.U., Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition, (1990); Redeker G., Linguistics markers of discourse structure, Linguistics, 29, pp. 1139-1172, (1991); Risselada R., Spooren W., Introduction: Discourse markers and coherence relation, Journal of Pragmatics, 30, pp. 131-133, (1998); Rost M., Listening in Language Learning., (1990); Rubin J., A review of second language listening comprehension research, Modern Language Journal, 78, 2, pp. 199-221, (1994); Schiffrin D., Discourse Markers, (1987); Sperber D., Wilson D., Relevance: Communication and Cognition, (2001); Taboada M., Discourse markers as signals (or not) of rhetorical relations, Journal of Pragmatics, 38, pp. 567-592, (2006); Underwood M., Teaching Listening, (1989); Wilson D., Relevance and communication, Modern Foreign Language, 2, pp. 200-217, (2000); Xu H.M., Metadiscourse: Across-cultural Perspective., (2001)
Article
All Open Access; Green Open Access; Hybrid Gold Open Access
Scopus