CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
Integrating gender into the political science core curriculum
Tác giả
Cassese E.C.; Bos A.L.; Duncan L.E.
Năm xuất bản
2012
Source title
PS - Political Science and Politics
Số trích dẫn
33
DOI
10.1017/S1049096512000042
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
The New Research on Gender in Political Psychology Conference brought together new and experienced teachers with interests in gender politics. The conference session Teaching Gender throughout the Curriculum generated a great deal of discussion concerning the pedagogical practice of gender mainstreaming. Gender mainstreaming-the integration of gendered content into courses required for a major-was recognized as one of 11 recommendations for reforming the undergraduate political science curriculum in the 1991 APSA report Liberal Learning an The Political Science Major: A Report to the Profession (popularly referred to as the Wahlke Report). Little information is available on the prevalence of gender courses in the undergraduate curriculum, but the data that does exist suggest such courses are uncommon (Brandes et al. 2001). We found virtually no data on the practice of gender mainstreaming in political science and little data in the way of assessing the impact of gendered content when students are exposed to it. This absence of data suggests gender mainstreaming has not emerged as a serious priority for curricular reform. © 2012 American Political Science Association.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Albright M., Madame Secretary: A Memoir, (2003); Women's Advancement in Political Science: A Report on the APSA Workshop on the Advancement of Women in Academic Political Science in the United States, (2005); Task Force Report on Political Science in the 21st Century, (2011); Beckwith K., A common language of gender?, Politics and Gender, 1, 1, pp. 128-136, (2005); Boxer B., Strangers in the Senate: Politics and the New Revolution of Women in America, (1993); Brandes L., Buker E., Burgess S., Cook C., Flammang J., Geiger S., Okin S., Yoon B.-S., Ackelsberg M., The status of women in political science: Female participation in the professoriate and the study of women and politics in the discipline, PS - Political Science and Politics, 34, 2, pp. 319-326, (2001); Camasso M., Family Caps, Abortion, and Women of Color: Research Conncetion and Political Rejection, (2007); Carroll S.J., Gender politics and the socializing impact of the women's movement, Political Learning in Adulthood, pp. 306-339, (1989); Cole E.R., Intersectionality and research in psychology, American Psychologist, 64, 3, pp. 170-180, (2009); Collins P.H., Black Feminist Thought, (1991); Crenshaw K., Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color, Stanford Law Review, 43, 6, pp. 1241-99, (1991); Darcy R., Welch S., Clark J., Women, Elections, and Representation, (1994); Eagly A.H., Carli L.L., Through the Labyrinth: The Truth about HowWomen Become Leaders, (2007); Falk E., Kenski K., Sexism versus partisanship: A new look at the question of whether America is ready for a woman president, Sex Roles, 54, 7-8, pp. 413-428, (2006); Hall Jamieson K., Beyond the Double Bind:Women and Leadership, (1995); Hare-Mustin R.T., Marecek J., The meaning of difference: Gender theory, postmodernism, and psychology, American Psychologist, 43, 6, pp. 455-464, (1988); Hare-Mustin R.T., Marecek J., Making A Difference: Psychology and the Construction of Gender, (1990); Hawkesworth M., Congressional Enactments of Race-Gender: Toward a Theory of Raced-Gendered Institutions, American Political Science Review, 97, 4, pp. 529-550, (2003); Hawkesworth M., Engendering political science: An immodest proposal, Politics and Gender, 1, 1, pp. 140-156, (2005); Heflick N.A., Goldenberg J.L., Objectifying sarah palin: Evidence that objectification causes women to be perceived as less competent and less fully human, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 3, pp. 598-601, (2009); Jackson P.W., Life in Classrooms, (1968); Kabeer N., Globalization, Labor Standards, and Women's Rights: Dilemmas of Collective (In) Action in an Interdependent World, Feminist Economics, 10, 1, pp. 3-35, (2004); Kowalski R.M., Including gender, race, and ethnicity in psychology content courses, Teaching of Psychology, 27, 1, pp. 18-24, (2000); Mankiller W.P., Wallis M., Mankiller: A Chief and Her People, (1999); McGlone M.S., Aronson J., Kobrynowicz D., Stereotype threat and the gender gap in political knowledge, Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 4, pp. 392-398, (2006); McIntosh P., White privilege: Unpacking the invisible knapsack, Race, Class, and Gender in the United States: An Integrated Study, pp. 188-192, (2004); Maresi N., The advancement ofwomen Ph.D.s in political science: Defining the problem, NSF-APSAWorkshop on Women's Advancement in Political Science, (2004); Norris P., Gender differences in political participation in britain: Traditional, radical, and revisionist models, Government and Opposition, 26, 1, pp. 56-74, (1991); Norris P., The gender gap: Old challenges, new approaches, Women and American Politics: New Questions, New Directions, pp. 146-172, (2003); Richards T.N., Garland T.S., Bumphus V.W., Thompson R., Personal and political? Exploring the feminization of the american homeless population, Journal of Poverty, 14, 1, pp. 97-115, (2010); Rios D., Stewart A.J., Winter D.G., Thinking she could be the next president:' why identifying with the curriculum matters, Psychology OfWomen Quarterly, 34, 1, pp. 328-338, (2010); Rosenthal C.S., One experience isworth a thousand words: Engaging undergraduates in field research on gender, PS: Political Science and Politics, 32, 1, pp. 63-68, (1999); Sanbonmatsu K., Democrats, (2002); Sanchez-Hucles J.V., Davis D.D., Women and women of color in leadership: Complexity, identity, and intersectionality, American Psychologist, 65, 3, pp. 171-181, (2010); Sapiro V., When are interests interesting? the problem of political representation of women, American Political Science Review, 75, 3, pp. 701-716, (1981); Schneider M.C., Gender bending or gender reinforcing? Effects of candidates' gender-based strategies, Journal of Women, Politics, and Policy; Schroeder P., 24 Years of HouseWork . . . and the Place Is Still AMess: My Life in Politics, (1998); Schwindt-Bayer L.A., Mishler W., An integrated model of women's representation, Journal of Politics, 67, 2, pp. 407-428, (2005); Settles I.H., Cortina L.M., Malley J., Stewart A.J., The climate for women in academic science: The good, the bad, and the changeable, Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 1, pp. 47-58, (2006); Sevelius J.M., Stake J.E., The Effects of Prior Attitudes and Attitude Importance on Attitude Change and Class Impact in Women's and Gender Studies, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 11, pp. 2341-2353, (2003); Silverberg H., Organizing a course that is attentive to issues of racial and sexual difference, PS: Political Science and Politics, 27, 4, pp. 718-719, (1994); Stewart A.J., McDermott C., Gender in psychology, Annual Review of Psychology, 55, pp. 519-544, (2004); Swers M., Understanding the policy impact of electing women: Evidence from research on congress and state legislatures, PS - Political Science and Politics, 34, 2, pp. 217-220, (2001); Traister R., Big Girls Don't Cry: The Election That Changed Everything for American Women, (2010); Wahlke J.C., Liberal learning and the political science major: A report to the profession, PS: Political Science & Politics, 24, 1, pp. 48-60, (1991); Wyer M., Murphy-Medley D., Damschen E.I., Rosenfeld K.M., Wentworth T.R., No quick fixes: Adding content aboutwomen to ecology course materials, Psychology OfWomen Quarterly, 31, 1, pp. 96-102, (2007)
Nơi xuất bản
Hình thức xuất bản
Conference paper
Open Access
All Open Access; Green Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus