CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

A Communities of Practice Approach to the Synoptic Problem

Tác giả

Madrigal R.A.

Năm xuất bản

2012

Source title

Teaching Theology and Religion

Số trích dẫn

DOI

10.1111/j.1467-9647.2012.00779.x

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84859481342&doi=10.1111%2fj.1467-9647.2012.00779.x&partnerID=40&md5=e9044d6e2941851bc7a1b8adaaa09ae8

Tóm tắt

Although the study of the Synoptic Problem has been the focus of scholarly attention for over two hundred years, the social learning theory known as Communities of Practice is a relatively recent phenomenon. This article describes a communities of practice approach to the study of the Synoptic Problem in an upper-division undergraduate course at a private, liberal arts college. Students with little or no prior knowledge of the Synoptic Problem were introduced to the salient issues of the Synoptic Problem as well as a theoretical framework in which to interpret them. Data were collected using a variety of mixed methods, including pre- and post-treatment tests, written survey questions, interviews, field notes, and focus group sessions. The results of this study suggest that a communities of practice approach can enhance students' knowledge of the Synoptic Problem and also foster an awareness of scholarly and personal presuppositions that influence the interpretation of the gospels. © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Từ khóa

Tài liệu tham khảo

Barr J., History and ideology in the Old Testament: Biblical Studies at the end of a millenium, (2000); The Cambridge companion to Biblical interpretation, (1998); Blomberg C., Jesus and the Gospels, (1997); Bloom M., Tensions in a non-traditional Spanish classroom, Language Teaching Research, 111, pp. 85-102, (2007); Bultmann R., Is exegesis without presuppositions possible? The hermeneutics reader, (1990); Carroll R.P., Poststructuralist approaches: New historicism and postmodernism, The Cambridge companion to Biblical interpretation, pp. 50-66, (1998); Corbin J., Strauss A., Basics of qualitative research, (2008); Cousin G., Deepwell F., Designs for network learning: A communities of practice perspective, Studies in Higher Education, 301, pp. 57-66, (2005); Crossan J.D., The historical Jesus: The life of a Mediterranean Jewish peasant, (1991); Crossan J.D., Who killed Jesus?: Exposing the roots of anti-Semitism in the gospel story of the death of Jesus, (1995); Davison C., The standards solution: The role of standards in developing IT professional competencies and communities of practice in English language teaching, Information technology and innovation in language education, pp. 255-283, (2005); Handbook of qualitative research, (2005); Denzin N.K., Lincoln Y.S., Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research, The Sage handbook of qualitative research, pp. 1-32, (2005); Dodd C.H., The authority of the Bible, (1938); Dungan D.L., A history of the synoptic problem: The canon, the text, the composition, and the interpretation of the gospels, (1999); Eddy P.R., Boyd G.A., The Jesus legend: A case for the historical reliability of the Synoptic Jesus tradition, (2007); Ehrman B.D., A brief introduction to the New Testament, (2008); Farmer W.R., Synopticon: The verbal agreement between the Greek texts of Matthew, Mark and Luke contextually exhibited, (1969); Glaser B.G., Strauss A.L., The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research, (1967); Goodacre M., The case against Q, (2001); Goodacre M., The synoptic problem: A way through the maze, (2001); Guba E.G., Lincoln Y.S., Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, The Sage handbook of qualitative research, pp. 191-215, (2005); Gundry S.N., Evangelical theology: Where should we be going?, Evangelicals and inerrancy, pp. 240-252, (1984); Kemper E.A., Stringfield S., Et al., Mixed methods sampling strategies in social science research, Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research, pp. 273-296, (2003); Lave J., Wenger E., Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation, (1991); Lincoln Y.S., Guba E.G., Naturalistic inquiry, (1985); Linnemann E., Is there a synoptic problem?, (1992); Madrigal R.A., Faith and reason, A place to stand, pp. 160-180, (1999); Madrigal R.A., John among the synoptic gospels, God so loved: Studies in the Gospel of John, pp. 1-25, (2002); Madrigal R.A., Religion, Encyclopedia of human development, 3, pp. 1074-1075, (2006); Madrigal R.A., (2007); Maxwell J.A., Qualitative research design: An interactive approach, (2005); Mercer J.A., Teaching the Bible in congregations: A congregational studies pedagogy for contextual education, Religious Education, 1003, pp. 280-295, (2005); Merriam S.B., Courtenay B., Et al., On becoming a witch: Learning in a marginalized community of practice, Adult Education Quarterly, 533, pp. 170-188, (2003); Miles M.B., Huberman A.M., Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods, (1994); Moore S., Literary criticism and the Gospels: The theoretical challenge, (1989); Newman I., Ridenour C.S., Et al., A typology of research purposes and its relationship to mixed methods, Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research, pp. 167-188, (2003); Parboosingh J.T., Physician communities of practice: Where learning and practice are inseparable, Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 224, pp. 230-236, (2002); Poirier J.C., Memory, written sources, and the synoptic problem: A response to Robert K. McIver and Marie Carroll, Journal of Biblical Literature, 1232, pp. 315-322, (2004); Ritchie J., Spencer L., Et al., Carrying out qualitative analysis, Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers, pp. 219-262, (2003); Robinson J.M., Kloppenborg J.S., Et al., The critical edition of Q, (2000); Sanders E.P., Davies M., Studying the Synoptic Gospels, (1989); Smith J.K., Hodkinson P., Relativism, criteria, and politics, The Sage handbook of qualitative research, pp. 915-932, (2005); Stein R.H., Difficult passages in the gospels, (1984); Stein R.H., Studying the Synoptic Gospels, (2001); Streeter B.H., The four gospels: A study of origins, (1925); Streeter B.H., The four gospels: A study of origins, (1964); Taylor V., The formation of the gospel tradition, (1960); Reader-response criticism: From formalism to post-structuralism, (1980); Trelstad M., The Ethics of Effective Teaching: Challenges from the Religious Right and Critical Pedagogy, Teaching Theology & Religion, 114, pp. 191-202, (2008); Wenger E., Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity, (1998); Wenger E., (2006); Wenger E., McDermott R.A., Et al., Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge, (2002); Wenger E., Snyder W.M., Communities of practice: The organizational frontier, Harvard Business Review, 781, pp. 139-145, (2000); Witherington III B., The living word of God, (2009); Wood Jr J.H., The New Testament gospels and the Gospel of Thomas: A new direction, New Testament Studies, 51, pp. 579-595, (2005)