CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

Student Learning Outcomes for Biblical Studies in the Liberal Arts

Tác giả

Webster J.S.; Runions E.; Gallagher E.V.; Lopez D.C.; Mcginn S.E.; Penner T.C.; Howell D.B.

Năm xuất bản

2012

Source title

Teaching Theology and Religion

Số trích dẫn

DOI

10.1111/j.1467-9647.2012.00807.x

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84863570767&doi=10.1111%2fj.1467-9647.2012.00807.x&partnerID=40&md5=08dd7d1c1efa8bc332c2ecd75c83c350

Tóm tắt

What is the role of biblical studies in a liberal arts curriculum? At the 2009 North American Society of Biblical Literature conference, a panel of seven Bible scholars provided brief analyses and arguments about the appropriate goals of teaching biblical studies in undergraduate contexts in this historical moment. They consider and critique the notion of specific Student Learning Outcomes or Objectives (SLOs) for courses about the Bible. In the process they address questions such as: what is the relative importance of "coverage" (biblical literacy, disciplinary knowledge and methods, and the historical creation of the biblical texts) versus modern and historical reception and uses of these texts? In their contributions, the authors analyze ways that a biblical studies course can develop the critical reading and writing skills that are the hallmark of undergraduate education. Some authors find these skills furthered by not bracketing from study the normative truth claims in the texts and instead strategically and critically encouraging the identity work and religious seeking associated with religious uses of these texts. Others call attention to the institutional and classroom power dynamics which inform and are constituted by the current student learning outcomes movement. © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Từ khóa

Tài liệu tham khảo

College Learning for a New Global Century, (2007); (2012); (2012); pp. 21-29, (2007); Adam A.K.M., Ascough R., Gravett S., Hunt A., Martin D., Wimberly E., Yang S.A., Should We Be Teaching the Historical Critical Method?, Teaching Theology and Religion, 12, 2, pp. 162-187, (2009); Batten A., Metaphors We Teach By: The Language of 'Learning Outcomes., Teaching Theology and Religion, 15, 1, pp. 16-28, (2012); Beal T., (2012); Bible Literacy Report, (2005); Bresciani M.J., Outcomes-Based Academic and Co-Curricular Program Review: A Compilation of Institutional Good Practices, (2009); Brookfield S., Becoming a Critically Reflective Teacher, (1995); Brookfield S.D., The Skillful Teacher, (2000); (2004); Fujiwara S., On Qualifying Religious Literacy: Recent Debates on Higher Education and Religious Studies in Japan, Teaching Theology and Religion, 13, 3, pp. 223-236, (2010); Glennon F., Assessment for the Right Reason The Ethics of Outcomes Assessment, Teaching Theology and Religion, 2, 1, pp. 14-25, (1999); Glennon F., Promoting Freedom, Responsibility, and Learning in the Classroom: The Learning Covenant a Decade Later, Teaching Theology and Religion, 11, 1, pp. 32-41, (2008); Hedrick C., Religion and Public Education: The Bible in the Bible Belt, Council of Societies for the Study of Religion Bulletin, 31, 4, pp. 90-94, (2002); Hinnells J.R., Funding and Assessment in British Universities: Impact on Theology and Religious Studies, Teaching Theology and Religion, 7, 3, pp. 124-133, (2004); Howell D.B., For the Bible Tells Me So: Using Developmental Theory to Teach the Bible."Perspectives in Religious, Studies, 27, 4, pp. 399-411, (2000); Hussey T., Smith P., The Trouble with Learning Outcomes, Active Learning in Higher Education, 3, 3, pp. 220-233, (2002); Jeffrey D.L., Evans C.S., Bartholomew C.G., The Bible and the University, 8, (2007); Martin D.B., Pedagogy of the Bible: An Analysis and Proposal, (2008); Newell R., Teaching the Bible along the Devotional/Academic Faultline: An Incarnational Approach to the Quarrel between Love and Knowledge, Teaching Theology and Religion, 6, 4, pp. 190-197, (2003); Pope L., Colleges that Change Lives, (2000); Prothero S., Religious Literacy, (2007); Roncace M., Gray P., Teaching the Bible: Practical Strategies for Classroom Instruction, (2005); Segovia F.F., Tolbert M.A., Teaching the Bible: The Discourses and Politics of Biblical Pedagogy, (1998); Sen A., Identity and Violence: The Illusion of Destiny, (2006); Smith J.Z., Teaching the Bible in the Context of General Education, Teaching Theology and Religion, 1, 2, pp. 73-78, (1998); Solvang E.K., Thinking Developmentally: The Bible, the First-Year College Student, and Diversity, Teaching Theology and Religion, 7, 4, pp. 223-229, (2004); Teaching the Bible: Initiations and Transformations, Spotlight on Teaching, 6, 2, (1998); Walvoord B.E., Teaching and Learning in College Introductory Religion Courses, (2008); Webster J.S., Buckley J.J., Jensen T., Floyd-Thomas S., Responses to the AAR-Teagle White Paper: 'The Religious Studies Major in a Post-9/11 World., Teaching Theology and Religion, 14, 1, pp. 34-71, (2011); Wiggins G.P., McTighe J., Understanding by Design, (2005)