Pakistan: Liberal education in context, policy, and practice
Gilani Z.H.
2012
Confronting Challenges to the Liberal Arts Curriculum: Perspectives of Developing and Transitional Countries
0
10.4324/9780203127322-9
The education sector in Pakistan, including post-secondary education, is bedevilled with a host of fundamental problems (State of Higher Education in Pakistan, 2006). As a result, curricular issues are quite low in priority for policy-makers and educationists, especially because education is seen, not primarily as a learning endeavor, but rather as an enterprise of achieving a diploma. In such a scenario, the inclusion of liberal arts in the curricula and the process of liberal learning do not have much meaning. A telling indicator of the low attention to such matters is the almost total absence of research and/or academic analysis and writings, especially for post-secondary education. Terms like “liberal education?? or “liberal arts,?? as they are usually understood or discussed in the United States, are quite alien to Pakistan’s educational discourse. Most educationists assume that the “other?? purpose of education is not very important and is, in any case, being adequately met by offerings in the social sciences, religion, or languages. However, there is very little informed discussion or debate even of such subjects, and the content of those subject areas is, by and large, being determined by ideological/political and bureaucratic considerations-not by educationists. When “liberal education?? comes up, it is usually misunderstood to mean something vaguely having to do with a particular moral approach or social view or, as Michael Lind (2006) suggests, pertaining to political liberalism or the liberation of the mind. As David Bloom and Henry Rosovsky (2003) have aptly observed about developing countries in general, the curricular focus in both secondary and higher education remains on vocations; and liberal education, if it is considered at all, is believed to be a luxury and not a necessity. © 2012 Taylor & Francis.
(2005); Altbach P.G., The humanities and social sciences in Asia: Endangered species?, International Higher Education, pp. 4-6, (2008); Bloom D.E., Rosovsky H., Why developing countries should not neglect liberal education, Liberal Education, (2003); Edelstein D., The third way in liberal education, Inside Higher Education, (2010); Britannica online encyclopaedia; Pakistan statistical year book, 2009., (2009); Gilani Z., Authoritarian thinking: Implications for education, Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 4, 2, pp. 1-16, (1996); Goodwin K., Liberal education beyond the U.S.: A paradox., (2009); Hasan M., Statement on Geo TV: “Chauraha, (2009); Hayes L.D., The crisis of education in Pakistan, (1987); Hoodbhoy P., Education and the state: Fifty years of Pakistan, (1998); Isani U.A.G., Virk M.L., Higher education in Pakistan: A historical and futuristic perspective, (2003); Jalal A., Conjuring Pakistan: History as official imagining, International Journal of Middle East Studies, 27, 1, pp. 73-89, (1995); Lind M., Why the liberal arts still matter, Wilson Quarterly, 30, 4, pp. 52-58, (2006); Linkage of Colleges and University Education: Policy Brief, (2005); National Education Policy: 1998-2010., (1998); National Education Policy and Implementation Programme, (1979); Nayyar A.H., Salim A., The subtle subversion: The state of curricula and textbooks in Pakistan, (2003); The sixth five year plan, pp. 388-389, (1983); (2008); Proceedings of the Pakistan Educational Conference, (1947); Rahman T., Language-teaching and world view in Urdu medium schools., (1995); Rahman T., Language and politics in Pakistan, (1996); Report of the Commission on National Education, (1959); Report of the Task Force on the Improvement of Higher Education in Pakistan: Challenges and opportunities, (2002); Saigol R., Becoming a modern nation: Educational discourse in the early years of Ayub Khan (1958-1964), (2003); State of higher education in Pakistan, 2005: Quality, (2006)
Taylor and Francis
Book chapter
Scopus