Integration of Learning: A Grounded Theory Analysis of College Students' Learning
Barber J.P.
2012
American Educational Research Journal
59
10.3102/0002831212437854
This article presents a grounded theory of "integration of learning" among traditional aged college students, which is characterized by the demonstrated ability to link various skills and knowledge learned in a variety of contexts. The author analyzed 194 interviews with students at liberal arts colleges to investigate empirically the ways undergraduates bring knowledge and experiences together so that educators might be able to more intentionally promote the integration of learning. Three distinct types of integration of learning emerged during analysis: (a) connection, the discovery of a similarity between ideas that themselves remain distinctive; (b) application, the use of knowledge from one context in another; and (c) synthesis, the creation of new knowledge by combining insights. © 2012 AERA.
grounded theory; higher education; learning; liberal arts; meaning making
Abes E.S., Jones S.R., McEwen M.K., Reconceptualizing the model of multiple dimensions of identity: The role of meaning-making capacity in the construction of multiple identities, Journal of College Student Development, 48, pp. 1-22, (2007); The Student Learning Imperative, (1994); Greater expectations: A new vision for learning as a nation goes to college, (2002); Our Students' Best Work: A Framework for Accountability Worthy of Our Mission, (2004); Liberal Education Outcomes: A Preliminary Report on Student Achievement in College, (2005); College Learning for the New Global Century, (2007); A Statement on Integrative Learning, (2004); Barber C.W., Culture, surprise, and adaptation: Examining undergraduate students' matriculation processes, (2010); Barber J.P., King P.M., (2007); Barr R.B., Tagg J., From teaching to learning: A new paradigm for undergraduate education, Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 27, 6, pp. 12-25, (1995); Baxter Magolda M.B., Creating Contexts for Learning and Self-Authorship: Constructive-Developmental Pedagogy, (1999); Baxter Magolda M.B., Making Their Own Way: Narratives for Transforming Higher Education to Promote Self-Development, (2001); Baxter Magolda M.B., Authoring Your Life: Developing an Internal Voice to Navigate Life's Challenges, (2009); Baxter Magolda M.B., King P.M., Constructing conversations to assess meaning-making: Self-authorship interviews, Journal of College Student Development, 48, pp. 491-508, (2007); Berger J.G., Development and Assessment of Self-Authorship: Exploring the Concept across Cultures, pp. 245-264, (2010); Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain, (1956); Boix Mansilla V., Assessing student work at disciplinary crossroads, Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 37, 1, pp. 14-21, (2005); Boix Mansilla V., Dawes Duraisingh E., Targeted assessment of students' interdisciplinary work: An empirically grounded framework proposed, Journal of Higher Education, 78, pp. 215-237, (2007); Boix Mansilla V., Dawes Duraisingh E., Wolfe C.R., Haynes C., Targeted assessment rubric: An empirically grounded rubric for interdisciplinary writing, Journal of Higher Education, 80, pp. 334-353, (2009); Bruner J.S., The Process of Education, (1960); Charmaz K., Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis, (2006); Dewey J., Democracy and Education, (1916); Dewey J., Experience and Education, (1938); Eyler J., Giles D.E., Theoretical roots of service learning in John Dewey: Toward a theory of service learning, Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 1, 1, pp. 77-85, (1994); Fischer K.W., A theory of cognitive development: The control and construction of hierarchies of skill, Psychological Review, 87, pp. 477-531, (1980); Glaser B.G., Strauss A.L., The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, (1967); Horn L., Nevill S., Profile of undergraduates in U.S. postsecondary education institutions: 2003-04: With a special analysis of community college students (NCES 2006-184), (2006); Huber M.T., Brown C., Hutchings P., Gale R., Miller R., Breen M., Integrative learning: Opportunities to connect, (2007); Powerful partnerships: A shared responsibility for learning, (1998); Judd C.H., Educational Psychology, (1939); Keeling R.P., Learning Reconsidered: A Campus-Wide Focus on the Student Experience, (2004); Kegan R., In over Our Heads: The Mental Demands of Modern Life, (1994); King P.M., Kendall Brown M., Lindsay N.K., VanHecke J.R., Liberal arts student learning outcomes: An integrated perspective, About Campus, 12, 4, pp. 2-9, (2007); King P.M., Kitchener K.S., Developing Reflective Judgment: Understanding and Promoting Intellectual Growth and Critical Thinking in Adolescents and Adults, (1994); King P.M., VanHecke J.R., Making connections: Using skill theory to recognize how students build and rebuild understanding, About Campus, 2, 1, pp. 10-16, (2006); Kiyama J.M., College aspirations and limitations: The role of educational ideologies and funds of knowledge in Mexican American families, American Educational Research Journal, 47, pp. 330-356, (2010); Knapp L.G., Kelly-Reid J.E., Ginder S.A., Enrollment in postsecondary institutions, fall 2009; graduation rates, 2003 & 2006 cohorts; and financial statistics, fiscal year 2009 (NCES 2011-230), (2011); Klein J.T., Integrative learning and interdisciplinary studies, Peer Review, 7, 4, pp. 8-10, (2005); Kolb D.A., Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development, (1984); Kuh G.D., High-Impact Educational Practices: What they are, Who has Access to Them, and Why they Matter, (2008); Ladson-Billings G., Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy, American Educational Research Journal, 32, pp. 465-491, (1995); Leskes A., Integrative Learning: Mapping the Terrain, (2004); Lewin K., Principles of Topological Psychology, (1936); Nelson Laird T.F., Shoup R., Kuh G.D., Schwarz M.J., The effects of discipline on deep approaches to student learning and college outcomes, Research in Higher Education, 49, pp. 469-494, (2008); Perkins D., Salomon G., Teaching for transfer, Educational Leadership, 46, pp. 22-32, (1988); Perkins D., Salomon G., Transfer of learning, International encyclopedia of education, (1992); Perry W.G., Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A Scheme, (1970); Peter K., Forrest Cataldi E., The road less traveled? Students who enroll in multiple institutions (NCES 2005-157), (2005); Pizzolato J.E., Creating crossroads for self-authorship: Investigating the provocative moment, Journal of College Student Development, 46, pp. 624-641, (2005); Rowan-Kenyon H., Soldner M., Inkelas K.K., The contributions of living-learning programs on developing sense of civic engagement in undergraduate students, Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 44, pp. 750-778, (2007); Schwartz M.S., Fischer K.W., Useful metaphors for tackling problems in teaching and learning, About Campus, 2, 1, pp. 2-9, (2006); Strauss A., Corbin J., Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, (1998); Thorndike E.L., Mental discipline in high school studies, Journal of Educational Psychology, 15, (1924); Tuomi-Grohn T., Engestrom Y., Between School and Work: New Perspectives on Transfer and Boundary-Crossing, pp. 19-38, (2003); What work requires of schools, (1991)
SAGE Publications Inc.
Article
Scopus