Faculty reflections on online course development and implementation for teacher education
Kress H.; Thering A.; Lalonde C.; Kim S.; Cleeton L.
2012
International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society
5
10.18848/1832-3669/cgp/v08i01/56263
This paper examines the recent implementation of online courses at one U.S. college in light of the current literature on the best practices for preparing elementary and secondary school teachers. The authors are professors in four fields of teacher education and are all engaged in developing online courses for their graduate-level students at a small liberal arts college along the northeast U.S.-Canada border. Concerns analyzed are learning barriers in online environments and definitions of quality expected for graduates. The paper includes recommendations for our teacher education colleagues at similar institutions. These issues are important as traditional teacher education competes with alternative routes to initial teacher certification and graduate-level professional development. When distance education is offered, how can university faculty or administration identify and reduce any learning barriers that students or faculty might face in the online classroom environment? We report the results of administering an "Online Learning Barriers" questionnaire to students in our college. Within the online classroom environment, how can faculty foster positive learning experiences that will improve K-12 teacher quality? This question deals with (1) the philosophy of education that the individual faculty subscribes to, and (2) the purposes or goals for teacher training as reflected in the college mission. Copyright © 2012, Common Ground.
Learning Barriers; Online Graduate Education; Pre-service Teacher Education; Student Perceptions
Copyright, distance education, & intellectual property, Issues in Higher Education, (2011); Digital government and technological change: The impact on public employees and quality public services, A Report from the AFT Public Employees Digital Government Task Force, (2002); Ash K., Characteristics of 'highly qualified' online teachers, Education Week's Digital Directions, 25, 7, (2009); Becker H.J., Findings from the teaching, learning, and computing survey: Is larry cuban right?, Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8, 51, (2000); Benbunan-Fich R., Starr R.H., Mediators of the effectiveness of online courses, IEEE Transactionson Professional Communication, 46, 4, pp. 296-312, (2003); Benson D., Haney W., Ore Tracy E., Persell C.H., Schulte A., Steele J., Winfield I., Digital technologies and the scholarship of teaching and learning in sociology, Teaching Sociology, 30, 2, pp. 140-157, (2002); Benton T., Online learning: Reaching out to the skeptics, The Chronicle of Higher Education, (2009); Bernard R., Abrami P., Lou Y., Borokhovski E., Wade A., Wozney L., Wallet P., Fiset M., Huang B., How does distance education compare with classroom instruction?: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature, Review of Educational Research, 74, 3, pp. 379-439, (2004); Bowen J., Teaching naked: Why removing technology from your classroom will improve student learning, National Teaching and Learning Forum, 16, 20, (2009); Braun T., Making a choice: The Perceptions and attitudes of online graduate students, Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16, 1, pp. 63-92, (2008); Bromley H., What to Ask about Technology, (1998); Burbules N., Rethinking dialogue in networked spaces, Cultural Studies, Critical Methodologies, 6, 1, pp. 107-122, (2006); Coggins C.C., Preferred learning styles and their impact on completion of external degree programs, The American Journal of Distance Education, 2, 1, pp. 25-37, (1988); Cole M.S., Field H.S., Harris S.G., Student learning motivation and psychological hardiness: Interactive effects on students' reactions to a management class, Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3, 1, pp. 64-85, (2004); Convery A., The pedagogy of the impressed: How teachers become victims of technological vision, Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15, 1, pp. 25-41, (2009); Coombs-Richardson R., Personalizing distance learning, Kappa Delta Pi Record, 43, 2, pp. 71-75, (2007); Flake J., Designing an online elementary mathematics education class, Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2006, pp. 3718-3725, (2006); Gee D.G., The impact of students' preferred learning style variables in a distance education course: A case study, ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 358 836, (1990); Gunga S., Ricketts I., The prospects for e-learning revolution in education: A philosophical analysis, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40, 2, pp. 294-314, (2008); Harper G., Kember D., Approaches to study of distance learning and education students, British Journal of Educational Technology, 17, pp. 212-222, (1992); Koohang A., Durante A., Learners' perceptions toward the web-based distance learning activities/assignments portion of an undergraduate hybrid instructional model, Journal of Informational Technology Education, 2, pp. 105-113, (2003); Encyclopedia of Applied Psychology, (2004); Lin S.Y., Overbaugh R.C., Computer-mediated discussion, self-efficacy and gender, British Journal of Educational Technology, 40, 6, pp. 999-1013, (2009); Liu Y., Ginther D., Cognitive styles and distance education, Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 2, 3, (1999); McCrory R., Putnam R., Jansen A., Interaction in online courses for teacher education: Subject matter and pedagogy, Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16, 2, pp. 155-180, (2008); Messick S., Individuality in Learning, (1976); Guide to Teaching Online Courses, (2011); Prensky M., Digital natives digital immigrants, On the Horizon, 9, 5, (2001); Sarasin L.C., Learning Style Perspectives: Impact in the Classroom, (1998); Schmeck R.R., Learning Strategies and Learning Styles, (1988); Serwatka J., Assessment in on-line CIS courses, Journal of Computer Information Systems, 43, 3, pp. 16-20, (2003); Shin M., Lee Y.J., Changing the landscape of teacher education via online teaching and learning, Techniques (Association for Career and Technical Education), 83, 9, pp. 32-33, (2009); Tyack D., Cuban L., Tinkering Toward Utopia: A Century of Public School Reform, (1995); Wooten B., Hancock T., Online learning offers flexibility and convenience for teacher education, Momentum, 40, 1, pp. 28-31, (2009)
Common Ground Research Networks
Article
Scopus