CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

Predicting academic performance in engineering using high school exam scores

Tác giả

De Winter J.C.F.; Dodou D.

Năm xuất bản

2011

Source title

International Journal of Engineering Education

Số trích dẫn

31

DOI

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-81155152136&partnerID=40&md5=9879fcc587990b64260208aa76474154

Tóm tắt

This study investigated the extent to which high school exam scores predict first-year grade point averages (GPA) and completion of Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) programs at a Dutch technical university. It was hypothesized that, of the exam scores, those for mathematics and physics would be the strongest predictors of academic performance. Factor analysis of high school exam scores was performed for a cohort of 1,050 students. Regression analysis of the extracted factors was conducted to predict first-yearGPAand B.Sc. completion. The results showed that the Natural Sciences and Mathematics factor (loading variables: physics, chemistry, and mathematics) was the strongest predictor of first-year GPA and B.Sc. completion, the Liberal Arts factor was a weak predictor, and the Languages factor had no significant predictive value. Differences were identified across the B.Sc. programs, with programs that relied strongly on Natural Sciences and Mathematics enrolling better-performing students. Women entered university with higher average exam scores than men, but gender was not predictive of first-year GPA and was a weak predictor (with an advantage for women) of B.Sc. completion. These findings may prove valuable in the development of predictors of academic performance in engineering. © 2011 TEMPUS Publications.

Từ khóa

Academic performance; Engineering; Mathematics; Natural sciences; Predictors

Tài liệu tham khảo

French B.F., Immekus J.C., Oakes W.C., An examination of indicators of engineering students' success and persistence, Journal of Engineering Education, 94, 4, pp. 419-425, (2005); Cariaga-Lo L.D., Enarson C.E., Crandall S.J., Zaccaro D.J., Richards B.F., Cognitive and noncognitive predictors of academic difficulty and attrition, Academic Medicine, 72, 10 SUPPL. 1, (1997); Kulatunga Moruzi C., Norman G.R., Validity of admissions measures in predicting performance outcomes: The contribution of cognitive and non-cognitive dimensions, Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 14, 1, pp. 34-42, (2002); Ting S.-M.R., Predicting asian americans' academic performance in the first year of college: An approach combining sat scores and noncognitive variables, Journal of College Student Development, 41, 4, pp. 442-449, (2000); Deary I.J., Strand S., Smith P., Fernandes C., Intelligence and educational achievement, Intelligence, 35, 1, pp. 13-21, (2007); Burton N.W., Ramist L., Predicting Success in College: SAT1 Studies of Classes Graduating since 1980, (2001); Kuncel N.R., Hezlett S.A., Ones D.S., Academic Performance, Career Potential, Creativity, and Job Performance: Can One Construct Predict Them All?, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 1, pp. 148-161, (2004); Bridgeman B., Burton N., Cline F., Substituting SAT II: Subject Tests for SAT I: Reasoning Tests: Impact on Admitted Class Composition and Quality, Research in Higher Education, 44, 1, pp. 83-98, (2003); Kuncel N.R., Crede M., Thomas L.L., Klieger D.M., Seiler S.N., Woo S.E., A meta-analysis of the validity of the Pharmacy College Admission Test (PCAT) and Grade Predictors of Pharmacy Student Performance, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 69, 3, pp. 339-347, (2005); Rex R.L., Hein D.D., An educational index to predict academic performance, Southern Journal of Educational Research, 6, 4, pp. 209-218, (1972); Brunner M., No g in education?, Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 2, pp. 152-165, (2008); Multon K.D., Brown S.D., Lent R.W., Relation of selfefficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation, Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 1, pp. 30-38, (1991); Schunk D.H., Self-efficacy and achievement behaviors, Educational Psychology Review, 1, 3, pp. 173-208, (1989); McKenzie K., Schweitzer R., Whosucceeds at university? factors predicting academic performance in first year australian university students, Higher Education Research and Development, 20, 1, pp. 21-33, (2001); Snow R.E., Toward assessment of cognitive and cognitive structures in learning, Educational Researcher, 18, 9, pp. 8-14, (1989); Corno L., The best-laid plans. modern conceptions of volition and educational research, Educational Researcher, 22, 2, pp. 12-22, (1993); Schiefele U., Krapp A., Winteler A., Interest as a predictor of academic achievement: A meta-analysis of research, The Role of Interest in Learning and Development, pp. 183-211, (1992); Chamorro-Premuzic T., Furnham A., Personality predicts academic performance: Evidence from two longitudinal university samples, Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 4, pp. 319-338, (2003); De Raad B., Schouwenburg H.C., Personality in learning and education: A review, European Journal of Personality, 10, 5, pp. 303-336, (1996); Felder R.M., Felder G.N., Dietz E.J., The effects of personality type on engineering student performance and attitudes, Journal of Engineering Education, 91, 1, pp. 3-17, (2002); Trapmann S., Hall B., Hirn J.-O.W., Schuler H., Metaanalysis of the relationship between the big five and academic success at university, Journal of Psychology, 215, 2, pp. 132-151, (2007); Allen J., Robbins S.B., Casillas A., Oh I.-S., Third-year college retention and transfer: Effects of academic performance, motivation, and social connectedness, Research in Higher Education, 49, 7, pp. 647-664, (2008); Duckworth A.L., Seligman M.E.P., Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents, Psychological Science, 16, 12, pp. 939-944, (2005); Harackiewicz J.M., Barron K.E., Tauer J.M., Elliot A.J., Predicting success in college: A longitudinal study of achievement goals and ability measures as predictors of interest and performance from freshman year through graduation, Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 3, pp. 562-575, (2002); Lubinski D., Persson Benbow C., Study of mathematically precocious youth after 35 years. uncovering antecedents for the development of math-science expertise, Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 4, pp. 316-345, (2006); Clifton R.A., Perry R.P., Roberts L.W., Peter T., Gender, psychosocial dispositions, and the academic achievement of college students, Research in Higher Education, 49, 8, pp. 684-703, (2008); Robbins S.B., Le H., Davis D., Lauver K., Langley R., Carlstrom A., Do Psychosocial and Study Skill Factors Predict College Outcomes? A Meta-Analysis, Psychological Bulletin, 130, 2, pp. 261-288, (2004); House J.D., Noncognitive predictors of achievement in introductory college chemistry, Research in Higher Education, 36, 4, pp. 473-490, (1995); Furnham A., Chamorro-Premuzic T., McDougall F., Personality, cognitive ability, and beliefs about intelligence as predictors of academic performance, Learning and Individual Differences, 14, 1, pp. 47-64, (2002); Tracey T.J., W E., Sedlacek, a comparison of white and black student academic success using noncognitive variables: A lisrel analysis, Research in Higher Education, 27, 4, pp. 333-348, (1987); Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs; Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board; Accreditation Criteria Guidelines; EUR-ACE Framework Standards for the Accreditation of Engineering Programmes; Astin A.W., Astin H.S., Undergraduate Science Education: The Impact of Different College Environments on the Educational Pipeline in the Sciences, (1992); Leuwerke W.C., Robbins S., Sawyer R., Hovland M., Predicting Engineering Major Status From Mathematics Achievement and Interest Congruence, Journal of Career Assessment, 12, 2, pp. 135-149, (2004); Nicholls G.M., Wolfe H., Besterfield-Sacre M., Shuman L.J., Larpkiattaworn S., A method for identifying variables for predicting stem enrollment, Journal of Engineering Education, 96, 1, pp. 33-45, (2007); Shoemaker J.S., Predicting cumulative and major gpa of uci engineering and computer science majors, Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association and the National Council on Measurement in Education, (1986); Zhang G., Anderson T., Ohland M., Carter R., Thorndyke B., Identifying factors influencing engineering student graduation: A longitudinal and cross-institutional study, Journal of Engineering Education, 93, 4, pp. 313-320, (2004); Halpern D.F., Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities, (2000); Humphreys L.G., Lubinski D., Yao G., Utility of predicting group membership and the role of spatial visualization in becoming an engineer, physical scientist, or artist, Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 2, pp. 250-261, (1993); Lubinski D., Spatial ability and stem: A sleeping giant for talent identification and development, Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 4, pp. 344-351, (2010); Zhang G., Thorndyke B., Carter R., Anderson T., Ohland M., Are engineering students different from others?, Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education, (2003); Kokkelenberg E.C., Sinha E., Who succeeds in stem studies? an analysis of binghamton university undergraduate students, Economics of Education Review, 29, 6, pp. 935-946, (2010); Halpern D.F., Benbow C.P., Geary D.C., Gur R.C., Hyde J.S., Gernsbacher M.A., The science of sex differences in science and mathematics, Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8, 1, pp. 1-51, (2007); Hyde J.S., Fennema E., Lamon S.J., Gender differences in mathematics performance:ameta-analysis, Psychological Bulletin, 107, 2, pp. 139-155, (1990); Brainard S.G., Carlin L., A longitudinal study of undergraduate women in engineering and science, Proceedings of the 1997 Frontiers in Education Conference, pp. 134-143, (1997); Grandy J., Gender and Ethnic Differences among Sciences and Engineering Majors: Experiences, Achievements, and Expectations, (1994); Felder R.M., Felder G.N., Mauney M., Hamrin Jr. C.E., Dietz E.J., A longitudinal study of engineering student performance and retention. iii. gender differences in student performance and attitudes, Journal of Engineering Education, 84, 2, pp. 151-163, (1995); Shull P.J., Weiner M.M., Thinking inside the box: Selfefficacy of women in engineering, International Journal of Engineering Education, 18, 4, pp. 438-446, (2002); Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering; Lynch R., Seery N., Gordon S., Design of a novel diagnostic tool for student performance in engineering degree courses, International Journal of Engineering Education, 24, 6, pp. 1103-1110, (2008); Jaarboek Onderwijs in Cijfers [Yearbook Education in Numbers]; Palmer B.H., Lesjes van de nederlanders: Little lessons from the dutch to promote educational quality, Research in Higher Education, 37, 1, pp. 69-88, (1996); Gedragscode voor Gebruik Van Persoonsgegevens in Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek. [Code of Conduct for Use of Personal Data in Scientific Research], (2005); Strenta A.C., Elliott R., Adair R., Matier M., Scott J., Choosing and leaving science in highly selective institutions, Research in Higher Education, 35, 5, pp. 513-547, (1994); Hyde J.S., Meta-analysis and the psychology of gender differences, Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 16, 1, pp. 55-73, (1990); Ramist L., Lewis C., McCamley-Jenkins L., Student Group Differences in Predicting College Grades: Sex, Language, and Ethnic Groups, (1994); Cole J.S., Gonyea R.M., Accuracy of self-reported sat and act test scores: Implications for research, Research in Higher Education, 51, 4, pp. 305-319, (2010); Lambert A.D., Terenzini P.T., Lattuca L.R., More than meets the eye: Curricular and programmatic effects on student learning, Research in Higher Education, 48, 2, pp. 141-168, (2007)

Nơi xuất bản

Hình thức xuất bản

Article

Open Access

Nguồn

Scopus