CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

Redefining the undergraduate English writing major: An integrated approach at a small comprehensive university

Tác giả

Brooks R.; Zhao P.; Braniger C.

Năm xuất bản

2010

Source title

What We Are Becoming: Developments in Undergratuate Writing Majors

Số trích dẫn

2

DOI

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84895032382&partnerID=40&md5=e310927cf7be498eff9da90b12ec3b97

Tóm tắt

The steady growth of undergraduate majors in rhetoric and composition in the last two decades has prompted discussions about the challenging development of these majors. In this chapter we will discuss the development of an undergraduate writing major with an integrated model at a small comprehensive university. This model provides us with a means of addressing some of the challenges faced by any English department in developing an effective undergraduate writing major. The first challenge is the difficulty of modeling an undergraduate writing program on graduate programs in rhetoric and composition. A second challenge we address deals with the place of undergraduate writing programs within liberal arts and professional schools of higher education. Within our own discipline of English studies, the undergraduate writing major must also address historical challenges in bridging the splits between theory and practice as well as between rhetoric and poetic. We also discuss the challenge that first-year writing programs often do not value how the integration of rhetorical theories and practices can benefit all students, not just writing majors. English departments trying to implement an integration model may have to address the challenge of traditional roles of English faculty that reinscribe the split between reception and production of text. Finally, the development of a new integrated undergraduate writing major presents potential challenges to curricular design of rhetoric and composition graduate programs. © 2010 by Utah State University Press. All Rights Reserved.

Từ khóa

Tài liệu tham khảo

Berlin J.A., Rhetorics, Poetics, and Cultures: Refiguring College English Studies, (2003); Brown S., Jackson R., Enos T., The arrival of rhetoric in the twentieth century: The 1999 survey of doctoral programs in rhetoric, Rhetoric Review, 182, pp. 233-279, (2000); Brown S., Torres M.F., Enos T., Juergensmeyer E., Mapping a landscape: The 2004 survey of MA programs in Rhetoric and Composition Studies, Rhetoric Review, 241, pp. 5-12, (2004); Burmeister B., Writing (into) the academic past, present, and future: Graduate students, curriculum reform, and doctoral education in English studies, Composition Studies, 282, pp. 113-135, (2000); Carpini D.D., Re-writing the humanities: The writing major's effect upon undergraduate studies in English departments, Composition Studies, 351, pp. 15-36, (2007); Chapman D., Tate G., A survey of doctoral programs in rhetoric and composition, Rhetoric Review, 52, pp. 124-186, (1987); De Joy N., Process This: Undergraduate Writing in Composition Studies, (2004); Curricular activism: The writing major as counterdis-course, Composition Studies, 351, pp. 41-52, (2007); Huber B.J., Undergraduate English programs: Findings from an MLA survey of the 1991-1992 academic year, ADE Bulletin, 115, pp. 34-73, (1996); Kinneavy J., A Theory of Discourse, (1971); North S., Refiguring the Ph. D. In English Studies: Writing, Doctoral Education, and SUNY-albanys Fusion-based Curriculum, (2000); Phelps L.W., Reproducing composition and rhetoric: The intel-lectual challenge of doctoral education, Composition Studies/Freshman English News, 232, pp. 115-132, (1995); Stygall G., At the century's end: The job market in rhetoric and composition, Rhetoric Review, 182, pp. 375-389, (2000); Taylor R., Preparing WPA for the small college context, Composition Studies, 322, pp. 53-73, (2004); Werner W., Thompson I.K., Rothschild J., A survey of specialized writing courses for English majors: 1975-76 to 1985-86, Rhetoric Review, 62, pp. 204-217, (1988); Young R.E., Steinberg E.R., Planning graduate programs in rhetoric in departments of English, Rhetoric Review, 182, pp. 390-402, (2000)

Nơi xuất bản

Utah State University Press

Hình thức xuất bản

Book chapter

Open Access

Nguồn

Scopus