Engaged scholarship: Historical roots, contemporary challenges
Glass C.R.; Fitzgerald H.E.
2010
Handbook of Engaged Scholarship
18
During the past twenty-five years, repeated efforts have been made to stimulate American higher education to more actively engage with society. Foundations and national organizations have provided leadership by creating commissions, issuing reports, and sponsoring visioning conferences. As part of its collective civic mission, America's higher education system has been challenged to partner with communities, organizations, schools, businesses and industries, government agencies, and funding agencies to address a wide range of societal problems and more actively engage with the open democratic society that supports the system. This more active relationship has generated a fresh vision about the democratic purposes of higher education and the ways universities contribute to the public good (Boyte, 2004; Boyte & Kari, 1996). From the founding of Campus Compact in 1985, to reformist calls for higher education to renew its covenant with society in the 1990s, there have been significant advances in scholarship-based outreach and engagement across the teaching, research, and service missions of higher education. These advances have stirred active and deep debate about the meaning of engagement, the role of higher education in society, higher education's faculty reward system, the meaning of private-public partnerships, and the allocation of resources needed to redirect America's college students back to core democratic values. These discussions have become so wide-ranging that a perceived need arose to codify the foundations of engaged scholarship, to assess its vision, types of work, personnel, and barriers, and to address issues related to measurement, evaluation, standards of practice, and methodologies. The time seemed right for a handbook on engaged scholarship. This handbook provides a sampling of the rich diversity of the ways in which campuses and scholars understand engagement. The dynamic tension this diversity creates within the academy has not only been central to the intellectual vitality of the conversation-it embodies the very democratic values it seeks to advance. There are differences in mission and resources among America's research universities and its historically minority-serving institutions, comprehensive universities, liberal arts colleges, and community colleges. Therefore, the emphases, structures, and practices in community-campus collaborations vary significantly among different institutions (Church, 2001). Nevertheless, each type of institution provides exemplars of community-campus engagement appropriate to its mission. In addition to diverse institutional practices, a wide range of scholars now identify themselves as engaged scholars. Scholars from the social sciences, humanities, natural sciences, and professional disciplines now integrate engagement as part of their research, teaching, and service roles and responsibilities at their institutions. The handbook encourages leaders and scholars to thoughtfully enter into deliberative conversations about how community engagement is practiced in their context, in the hope that it will help to frame transformational change in higher education as it fully embraces the challenges of the twenty-first century. We open the discussion about engaged scholarship, in this chapter, by focusing on its history, the meaning and diversity of its practices, and the challenges it faces in contemporary higher education. © 2010 by Michigan State University Press. All rights reserved.
Bok D., Universities and the Future of America, (1990); Bonnen J.T., The land-grant idea and the evolving outreach university, University-community Collaborations for the Twenty-first Century, pp. 25-70, (1998); Boyer E.L., Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate, (1990); Boyer E.L., The scholarship of engagement, Journal of Public Service and Outreach, 1, pp. 11-20, (1996); Boyte H., Everyday Politics: Reconnecting Citizens and Public Life, (2004); Boyte H., Hollander E., Wingspread declaration on renewing the civic mission of the American research university, The Wingspread Conference, (1999); Boyte H., Kari N., Building America: The Democratic Promise of Public Work, (1996); Braxton J.M., Luckey W., Helland P., Institutionalizing a Broader View of Scholarship through Boyer's Four Domains, (2002); Byrne J.V., Public Higher Education Reform Five Years after the Kellogg Commission on the Future of State and Land-Grant Universities, (2006); Campbell J.R., Reclaiming a Lost Heritage: Land-grant and other Higher Education Initiatives for the Twenty-first Century, (1995); CDF Reports, 15, 4, (1994); Church R.L., Counting public service: Can we make meaningful comparisons within and among institutions, The Symposium Broadening the Carnegie Classification's Attention to Mission: Incorporating Public Service, at the Annual Meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, (2001); Church R.L., Zimmerman D.L., Bargerstock B.A., Kenney P.A., Measuring scholarly outreach at Michigan state university: Definition, challenges, tools, Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 6, pp. 141-152, (2003); Community-Campus Partnerships for Health (CCPH), (2008); Driscoll A., Carnegie's community-engagement classification: Intentions and insights, Change, 40, (2008); Driscoll A., A Guide to Reciprocal Community-campus Partnerships, (2008); Ellison J., Eatman T., Scholarship in Public: Knowledge Creation and Tenure Policy in the Engaged University: A Resource on Promotion and Tenure in the Arts, Humanities, and Design, (2008); Fear F.A., Rosaen C., Bawden R.J., Foster-Fishman P.G., Coming to Critical Engagement, (2006); Fitzgerald H.E., Eiden R.D., Paternal alcoholism, family functioning, and infant mental health, Zero to Three, 27, pp. 20-26, (2007); Fitzgerald H.E., McKelvey L.M., Schiffman R.F., Montanez M., Effects of exposure to neighborhood violence and paternal antisocial behavior on low-income families and their children, Parenting: Research and Practice, 6, pp. 243-258, (2006); Fitzgerald H.E., Smith P., Book P., Rodin K., Draft CIC Report: Resource Guide and Recommendations for Defining and Benchmarking Engagement, (2005); Fitzgerald H.E., Zucker R.A., Growing up in an alcoholic family: Pathways of risk aggregation for alcohol use disorders, The Crisis in Youth Mental Health: Critical Issues and Effective Program: Vol. 3 Families, Children and Communities, pp. 249-271, (2006); Fitzgerald H.E., Zucker R.A., Freeark K., The Crisis in Youth Mental Health: Critical Issues and Effective Programs, (2006); Garbarino J., What children and youth can tell us about violence and trauma, The Child, Youth, and Family Services Quarterly, 39, pp. 2-4, (1994); Glassick C.E., Huber M.T., Maeroff G.I., Scholarship Assessed: Evaluation of the Professoriate, (1997); Habermas J., The Theory of Communicative Action: Vol. 2. Lifeword and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason, (1987); History of Campus Compact, (2007); Holland B., Scholarship and Mission in the 21st Century University: The Role of Engagement, (2005); Hussong A.M., Zucker R.A., Wong M.W., Fitzgerald H.E., Puttler L.I., Social competence in children of alcoholic parents over time, Developmental Psychology, 41, pp. 747-759, (2005); Johnson R.N., Wamser C.C., Respecting diverse scholarly work: The key to advancing the multiple missions of the urban university, Metropolitan Universities, 7, pp. 43-59, (1997); Jordan C., Community-engaged scholarship review, promotion & tenure package, Peer Review Workgroup, Community-engaged Scholarship for Health Collaborative, (2007); Renewing the Covenant: Learning, Discovery, and Engagement in a New Age and Different World, (2000); Returning to Our Roots: Executive Summaries of the Reports of the Kellogg Commission on the Future of State and Land-Grant Universities, (2001); Lerner R.M., America's Youth in Crisis: Challenges and Options for Programs and Policies, (1995); Lerner R.L., Simon L.A., University-community Collaborations for the Twenty-first Century, (1998); London S., Practical Strategies for Institutional Civic Engagement and Institutional Leadership that Reflect and Shape the Covenant between Higher Education and Society, (2002); McCall R.B., Groark C.J., Strauss M.S., Johnson C.N., Challenges of university-community outreach to traditional research universities, University-community Collaborations for the Twenty-first Century, pp. 203-230, (1998); Rice R.E., Scholarship reconsidered: History and context, Faculty Priorities Reconsidered, pp. 17-31, (2005); Silka L., Paradoxes of partnerships: Reflections on university-community collaborations, Politics and Society, 7, pp. 335-359, (1999); Votruba J.C., Promoting the extension of knowledge in service to society, Metropolitan Universities, 3, 3, pp. 72-80, (1992); Whitehead A.N., Essays in Science and Philosophy, (1947); Wyld H.C., The Universal Dictionary of the English Language, (1938)
Michigan State University Press
Book chapter
Scopus