CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
On telling faculty the truth
Tác giả
Kline D.
Năm xuất bản
2010
Source title
The Ethical Challenges of Academic Administration
Số trích dẫn
0
DOI
10.1007/978-90-481-2841-9_11
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
A type of administrative lie (involving department chairs evaluating faculty) is illustrated. After arguing that the model cases are not "white lies" an ethical justification is sought for the practice. Consequentialism, though often assumed by administrators, does not provide a persuasive justification. The resources internal to the chair's role as a professional are examined and also found to provide insufficient justification. Finally, it is argued that the chair's role as a teacher and proponent of liberal education is inconsistent with chairs lying to faculty. © 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
Từ khóa
Autonomy; Consequentialism; Faculty; Liberal education; Lying
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bok S., Lying, (1989); Eisenberg P., The truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, Moral Responsibility and the University: Studies in Academic Ethics, (1990); Collins J., Should doctors tell the truth?, Bioethics, (1999); Collins, Should Doctors Tell the Truth?; Greenwood E., Attributes of a Profession, Ethical Issues in Engineering, pp. 68-69, (1991); Bayles M.D., The Professions" and Everett C. Hughes, "Professions, Ethical Issues in Professional Life, (1988); Greenwood E., Attributes of a Profession; Strike K., The Authority of Ideas and the Students' Right to Autonomy, A Professor's Duties, (1994)
Nơi xuất bản
Springer Netherlands
Hình thức xuất bản
Book chapter
Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus