CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

A Qualitative Assessment of Efforts to Integrate Data Analysis throughout the Sociology Curriculum: Feedback from Students, Faculty, and Alumni

Tác giả

Wilder E.I.

Năm xuất bản

2010

Source title

Teaching Sociology

Số trích dẫn

13

DOI

10.1177/0092055X10370118

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-77955886699&doi=10.1177%2f0092055X10370118&partnerID=40&md5=989126bb773d20e2963697959fca8db8

Tóm tắt

Quantitative and computer literacy are increasingly recognized as core components of a liberal education in sociology. This study draws on student, faculty, and alumni questionnaires to identify the kinds of quantitative literacy skills that are perceived to be most critical for students enrolled in sociology courses. Respondents at Lehman College highlighted the need for proficiencies in a number of key areas, including (a) basic mathematical and statistical skills, such as measures of central tendency, ratios, and percentages; (b) the presentation and interpretation of quantitative data, including tables and charts; (c) the research process, such as developing hypotheses, sampling, and interpreting data; and (d) computer-based presentation and data analysis, including the use of software programs such as SPSS and Excel. Moreover, hands-on work in data analysis was highly valued by all respondents, particularly as a strategy for mastering these skills. This study suggests that effective education in quantitative literacy requires both (a) the removal of barriers to the incorporation of data analysis in sociology courses and (b) a well-sequenced sociology curriculum that pinpoints specific quantitative and computer literacy learning objectives at multiple course levels. © American Sociological Association 2010.

Từ khóa

active learning; integrating data analysis; numeracy; quantitative reasoning; statistics

Tài liệu tham khảo

Alter G., Hodge S., Hoelter L.F., McMartin F., QL Rubric Including Modified Learning Outcomes, (2009); Fast Facts, (2009); Integrating Data Analysis into the Curriculum, (2005); Spring 2009 Draft for Public Release of Quantitative Literacy VALUE Rubric, (2009); Bills D.R., Stanley A.Q., Social Science Computer Labs as Sites for Teaching and Learning: Challenges and Solutions in their Design and Maintenance, Teaching Sociology, 29, 2, pp. 153-162, (2001); Blalock Jr. H.M., The Real and Unrealized Contributions of Quantitative Sociology, American Sociological Review, 54, 3, pp. 447-460, (1989); Bridges G.S., Gillmore G.M., Pershing J.L., Bates K.A., Teaching Quantitative Research Methods: A Quasi-Experimental Analysis, Teaching Sociology, 26, 1, pp. 14-28, (1998); City University of New York Office of Institutional Research and Assessment, 2006 Student Experience Survey, (2006); Clifton A.K., Doin Soc: An Evaluation of Actively Involving Introductory Students in the World of Sociology, Teaching Sociology, 3, 2, pp. 138-147, (1976); Conklin G.H., The Frustration of Academic Innovation: Can New Teaching Techniques Survive in the Academic Marketplace?, Teaching Sociology, 5, 2, pp. 125-140, (1978); Cuban L., Encouraging Progressive Pedagogy, Mathematics and Democracy: The Case for Quantitative Literacy, pp. 87-91, (2001); Diaz De Rada V., The Effect of Follow-up Mailings on the Response Rate and Response Quality in Mail Surveys, Quality & Quantity, 39, 1, pp. 1-18, (2005); Fox R.J., Crask M.R., Kim J., Mail Survey Response Rate: A Meta-analysis of Selecting Techniques for Inducing Response, Public Opinion Quarterly, 52, 4, pp. 467-491, (1988); Frey W.H., First C.L., Bringing Census Data into the Classroom: World Wide Web Access and Teacher Networking; Fuller T.D., Using Computer Assignments to Promote Active Learning in the Undergraduate Social Problems Course, Teaching Sociology, 26, 3, pp. 215-221, (1998); Grauerholz L., Gibson G., Articulation of Goals and Means in Sociology Courses: What We Can Learn from Syllabi, Teaching Sociology, 34, 1, pp. 5-22, (2006); Himes C.L., Caffrey C., Linking Social Gerontology with Quantitative Skills: A Class Project Using U.S. Census Data, Teaching Sociology, 31, 1, pp. 85-94, (2003); HACU Member Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSIs), (2009); Howery C.B., Promoting Undergraduate Research in Sociology, Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly, 21, 4, pp. 163-167, (2001); Howery C.B., Rodriguez H., Integrating Data Analysis (IDA): Working with Sociology Departments to Address the Quantitative Literacy Gap, Teaching Sociology, 34, 1, pp. 23-38, (2006); James J.M., Bolstein R., The Effect of Monetary Incentives and Follow-up Mailings on the Response Rate and Response Quality in Mail Surveys, Public Opinion Quarterly, 54, 3, pp. 346-361, (1990); Johnson Y.N., Kaplan J.J., Assessing the Quantitative Literacy of Students at a Large Public Research University; Kain E.L., Building the Sociological Imagination through a Cumulative Curriculum: Professional Socialization in Sociology, Teaching Sociology, 27, 1, pp. 1-16, (1999); Karp D.R., Using SPSS for Windows to Enhance, Not Overwhelm, Course Content, Teaching Sociology, 23, 3, pp. 234-240, (1995); King K.M., Leading Classroom Discussions: Using Computers for a New Approach, Teaching Sociology, 22, 2, pp. 174-182, (1994); Lagerlof J., Seltzer A., Do Remedial Mathematics Courses Help Economics Students?, (2008); Lehman College Office of Institutional Research, Planning and Assessment, Lehman College 2006 Fact Book, (2006); Lehman College 2008 Fact Book, (2008); Madison B.L., The Many Faces of Quantitative Literacy, Quantitative Literacy: Why Numeracy Matters for Schools and Colleges, pp. 3-6, (2003); Markham W.T., Research Methods in the Introductory Course: To Be or Not to Be?, Teaching Sociology, 19, 4, pp. 464-471, (1991); McKinney K., Howery C.B., Strand K.J., Kain E.L., Berheide W.C., Liberal Learning and the Sociology Major Updated: Meeting the Challenge of Teaching Sociology in the Twenty-First Century, (2004); Misra J., Teaching Stratification: Stimulating Interest and Critical Thinking through Research Projects, Teaching Sociology, 25, 4, pp. 278-291, (1997); Nederhof A., Effects of Repetition and Consistency of Personalization Treatments on Response Rates in Mail Surveys, Social Science Research, 12, 1, pp. 1-9, (1983); Persell C.H., Bringing PCs into Introductory Sociology Courses: First Steps, Missteps, and Future Prospects, Teaching Sociology, 20, 2, pp. 91-103, (1992); Pozo S., Stull C.A., Requiring a Math Skills Unit: Results of a Randomized Experiment, American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 96, 2, pp. 437-441, (2006); Raymondo J.C., Developing a Computer Laboratory for Undergraduate Sociology Courses, Teaching Sociology, 24, 3, pp. 305-309, (1996); Reed-Sanders D., Liebowitz S., An Empirical Test of Integration of Computers in Introductory Sociology, Teaching Sociology, 19, 2, pp. 223-230, (1991); Scheel E.D., Using Active Learning Projects to Teach Research Skills throughout the Sociology Curriculum, Sociological Practice: A Journal of Clinical and Applied Sociology, 4, 2, pp. 145-170, (2002); Scheitle C.P., Web-based Data Analysis: Creating a Sociological Laboratory, Teaching Sociology, 34, 1, pp. 80-86, (2006); Steen L.A., Everything I Needed to Know about Averages I Learned in College, Peer Review, 6, 4, pp. 4-8, (2004); Sweet S., Strand K., Cultivating Quantitative Literacy: The Role of Sociology, Teaching Sociology, 34, 1, pp. 1-4, (2006); Wilder E.I., Responding to the Quantitative Literacy Gap among Students in Sociology Courses, Teaching Sociology, 37, 2, pp. 151-170, (2009); Wright E.R., Lawson A.H., Computer Mediated Communication and Student Learning in Large Introductory Sociology Classes, Teaching Sociology, 33, 2, pp. 122-135, (2005); Wolfe C.R., Quantitative Reasoning across a College Curriculum, College Teaching, 41, 1, pp. 3-9, (1993); Ziegler S.J., Increasing Response Rates in Mail Surveys without Increasing Error, Criminal Justice Policy Review, 17, 1, pp. 22-31, (2006)

Nơi xuất bản

SAGE Publications Inc.

Hình thức xuất bản

Article

Open Access

Nguồn

Scopus