Learning environment: Relevant or not to students' decision to leave university?
Hovdhaugen E.; Aamodt P.O.
2009
Quality in Higher Education
24
10.1080/13538320902995808
This paper presents an analysis of the reasons why students in Norway leave higher education institutions before degree completion and the extent to which these reasons are of the type that can be influenced by the university. As occurs in many countries, a proportion of students starting an undergraduate liberal arts degree in Norway leave their university without completing their degree. The institutions' capacity to influence this decision is limited. The most common reasons for students either transferring or dropping out are beyond the university's control. However, for both types of leavers, the learning environment seems to have been somewhat influential in the decision to leave. Therefore, improving the learning environment through closer contact between students and teachers will probably also enhance retention. © 2009 Taylor & Francis.
Factor analysis; Learning environment; Norway; Retention (of students); Student departure; Student-staff interaction
Aamodt P.O., Studiegjennomføring og studiefrafall. En statistisk oversikt, Completion and Dropout, a Statistical Overview, (2001); Burke J., Reinventing accountability. From bureaucratic rules to performance results, Achieving Accountability in Higher Education, (2005); Davies R., Elias P., Dropping Out: A Study of Early Leavers from Higher Education, (2003); What is Quality in Higher Education?, (1992); Hovdhaugen E., Transfer and Dropout: Different forms of student departure in Norway, Studies in Higher Education, 34, 1, pp. 1-17, (2009); Kim J.-O., Mueller C.W., Introduction to Factor Analysis. What it is and How to Do it, (1978); Do Your Duty-Demand Your Rights, (2001); Information in English, (2009); Longden B., An institutional response to changing student expectations and their impact on retention rates, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 28, 2, pp. 173-187, (2006); McInnis C., James R., Access and retention in Australian higher education, Retention and Student Success in Higher Education, (2004); Noel L., Levitz R., Saluri D., Increasing Student Retention, (1985); Opheim V., The economic burden of student loan repayment in Norway, Education Economics, 13, 4, pp. 427-447, (2005); Ozga J., Sukhnandan L., Undergraduate non-completion: Developing an explanatory model, Higher Education Quarterly, 52, 3, pp. 316-333, (1998); Peterson S.L., Kovel-Jarboe P., Schwartz S.A., Quality improvement in higher education: Implications for student retention, Quality in Higher Education, 3, 2, pp. 131-141, (1997); Sharma R., Burgess Z., Student discontinuation at a technological higher education institution, Journal of Tertiary Education Administration, 16, 2, pp. 225-238, (1994); Tinto V., Linking learning and leaving: Exploring the role of the college classroom in student departure, Reworking the Student Departure Puzzle, (2000); Tinto V., Leaving College, (1993); Wiers-Jenssen J., Utlendighet eller utflukt? Norske studenters vurdering av å studere i utlandet, Exile or Excursion? Norwegian Students' Evaluation of Studying Abroad, (1999); Yorke M., Leaving Early. Undergraduate Non-Completion in Higher Education, (1999); Yorke M., The quality of the student experience: What can institutions learn from data relating to non-completion?, Quality in Higher Education, 6, 1, pp. 61-75, (2000); Yorke M., Longden B., Retention and Student Success in Higher Education, (2004); Yorke M., Longden B., The First-Year Experience of Higher Education in the UK. Final report, (2008); Zepke N., Leach L., Educational quality, institutional accountability and the retention discourse, Quality in Higher Education, 13, 3, pp. 237-248, (2007); Zepke N., Leach L., Prebble T., Being learner centred: One way to improve student retention, Studies in Higher Education, 31, 5, pp. 587-600, (2006)
Article
Scopus