CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
Men as allies in feminist pedagogy in the undergraduate psychology curriculum
Tác giả
Kahn J.S.; Ferguson K.
Năm xuất bản
2010
Source title
Women and Therapy
Số trích dẫn
4
DOI
10.1080/02703140903404853
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
This article presents the importance of feminist pedagogy in under-graduate psychology education and proposes the premise that men doing feminist work can be effective allies when they acknowledge their privilege, are actively self-reflective, confront a tendency to conform to masculine norms, and are active in their pursuits of social justice. The article then summarizes four major themes in feminist pedagogy as they apply to undergraduate education. In addition, examples of course scenarios and anecdotes from students are provided to assist in demonstrating some of the attempts the primary author has made to incorporate feminism in his work as an instructor. These initial educational steps are argued to provide a baseline for future endeavors in feminist thought and application. © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
Từ khóa
Ally activism; College curriculum; Feminist; Liberal arts; Pedagogy; Psychology; Social sciences; Undergraduate
Tài liệu tham khảo
Profiles of APA Membership, (2002); Baker's D., Feminist student voices, Shaping the Future of Feminist Psychology, pp. 227-244, (1997); Brabeck M., Brown L., Feminist theory and psychological practice, Shaping the Future of Feminist Psychology, pp. 15-35, (1997); Brod H., To be a man, or not to be a man-That is the feminist question, Men Doing Feminism, pp. 197-212, (1998); Bronstein P., Quina K., Perspectives on gender balance and cultural diver- sity in the teaching of psychology, Teaching a Psychology of People, pp. 3-12, (1988); Brooks G.R., Helping men embrace equality, Feminist Family Therapy: Empowerment In Social Context, pp. 163-176, (2003); Brown W.E., Chance L., Payne T., Male and female teacher education students' profiles on the Edward's personal preference schedule, Education, 115, pp. 475-480, (1995); Burman E., Emotions in the classroom: And the institutional politics of knowledge, Psychoanalytic Studies, 3, pp. 313-324, (2002); Catsambis S., The path to math: Gender and racial-ethnic differences in mathematics participation from middle school to high school, Gender, Culture, and Ethnicity: Current Research About Women and Men, pp. 102-120, (1999); Chin J.L., Russo N.F., Bloom J., Felicio D., Madden M., Enns C.Z., Et al., Feminist Curriculum Development: Principles and Resources Shaping the Future of Feminist Psychology, pp. 93-120, (1997); Crosby F.J., Reinardy L.M., Closeness between female college students and their professors: A novel assessment technique, Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 28, pp. 477-484, (1993); Defour D.C., Paludi M.A., Integrating scholarship on ethnicity into the psychology of women course, Teaching of Psychology, 18, pp. 85-90, (1991); Enns C.Z., Forrest L.M., Toward defining and integrating multicultural and feminist pedagogies, Teaching and Social Justice: Integrating Multicultural and Feminist Theories In the Classroom, pp. 3-23, (2005); Fassinger P., Understanding classroom interaction: Students' and professors' contributions to students silence, Journal of Higher Education, 66, pp. 82-96, (1995); Galguera T., Students' attitudes toward teachers' ethnicity, bilinguality, and gender, Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 20, pp. 411-428, (1998); Gilligan C., In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development, (1982); Jensen R., Homecoming: The relevance of radical feminism for gay men, Journal of Homosexuality, 47, pp. 75-81, (2004); Kahane D.J., Male feminism as oxymoron, Men Doing Feminism, pp. 213-235, (1998); Kanekar S., Professorial prestige as a function of discipline and gender, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, pp. 1026-1032, (1990); Kaschak E., Engendered Lives, (1992); Keller J., Blatant stereotype threat and women's math performance: Self-handicapping as a strategic means to cope with obtrusive negative performance evaluations, Sex Roles, 47, pp. 193-198, (2002); Kimmel E., Worrell J., Daniluk J., Gawalek M.A., Lerner K., Stahley G., Et al., Preaching what we practice: Principles and strategies of feminist pedagogy, Shaping the Future of Feminist Psychology, pp. 121-153, (1997); Kimmel M.S., Who's afraid of men doing feminism?, Men Doing Feminism, pp. 57-68, (1998); Kite M.E., Russo N.F., Brehm S.S., Fouad N., Hall C.C., Hyde J.S., Women psychologists in academe: Mixed progress, unwarranted complacency, American Psychologist, 56, pp. 1080-1098, (2001); Klein R.D., The "men-problem" in women's studies: The expert, the ignor- amus, and the poor dear, Women's Studies International Forum, 6, pp. 413-421, (1983); Kohout J., Who's earning those psychology degrees?, National Science, (2000); Foundation/SRS Survey of Earned Doctorates; Lord S.B., Teaching the psychology of women: Examination of a teaching-learning model, Psychology of Women Quarterly, 7, pp. 70-80, (1982); Maher F.A., Progressive education and feminist pedagogies: Issues in gender, power, and authority, Teachers College Record, 101, pp. 35-60, (1999); Mays V.M., Even the rat was White and male: Teaching the psychology of Black women, Teaching a Psychology of People, pp. 142-146, (1988); McCormick N.B., Celebrating diversity: Feminist sexuality education in the undergraduate classroom, Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 9, pp. 37-69, (1997); McKay J., Teaching against the grain: A learner-centered, media-based, and profeminist approach to gender and nonviolence in sport, A Paradoxes of Youth and Sport, pp. 103-118, (2002); McQuillen J.S., Role models in education: Their relation to student's perceived competence, stress and satisfaction, Education, 112, pp. 403-407, (1995); McQuillan J., The importance of variation among men and the benefits of feminism for families, Men In Families: When Do They Get Involved? What Difference Does it Make?, pp. 213-225, (1998); New C., Oppressed and oppressors? The systematic mistreatment of men, Sociology, 35, pp. 729-748, (2001); Paludi M.A., Placing women psychologists in the psychology of women course, Teaching of Psychology, 18, pp. 172-174, (1991); Pease B., (Re)Constructing men's interests, Men and Masculinities, 5, pp. 165-177, (2002); Rasheed S., Ancis J.R., Multicultural education and critical pedagogy approaches, Teaching and Social Justice: Integrating Multicultural and Feminist Theories In the Classroom, pp. 69-84, (1995); Richmond G., Howes E., Kurth L., Hazelwood C., Connections and critique: Feminist pedagogy and science teacher education, Journal of Research In Science Teaching, 35, pp. 897-918, (1998); Sears S.R., Hennessey A.C., Students' perceived closeness to professors: The effects of school, professor gender, and student gender, Sex Roles, 35, pp. 651-658, (1996); Stake J.E., Hoffman F.L., Putting feminist pedagogy to the test: The experience of women's studies from student and teacher perspectives, Psychol- Ogy of Women Quarterly, 24, pp. 30-38, (2000); Tisdell E.J., Poststructural feminist pedagogies: The possibilities and limita- tions of feminist emancipatory adult learning theory and practice, Adult Educa- Tion Quarterly, 48, pp. 139-157, (1998); Tomlinson M.J., Fassinger R.E., The faces of feminist pedagogy: A survey of psychologists and their students, Charting a New Course For Feminist Psychology, pp. 37-64, (2002); Tsui L., Fostering critical thinking in college students: A mixed-methods study of influences inside and outside of the classroom, Dissertation Abstracts International, 60, 1 A, (1999); Tuckman B.W., The effect of learning and motivation strategies training on college students' achievement, Journal of College Student Development, 44, pp. 430-437, (2003); Unger R.K., Women as subjects, actors, and agents in the history of psychol- ogy, Handbook of The Psychology of Women and Gender, pp. 3-16, (2001); Weiss S., How teacher's autobiographies influence their responses to children's behaviors: The psychodynamic concept of transference in classroom life. Part 1, Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 7, pp. 9-18, (2002); Whitehead S.M., Man: The invisible gendered subject, The Masculinities Reader, pp. 351-368, (2001); Woods C., Gender differences in moral development and acquisition: A review of Kohlberg's and Gilligan's models of justice and care, Social Behavior and Personality, 24, pp. 375-384, (1996); Worrell J., Johnson N.H., Introduction: Creating the future: Process and promise in feminist practice, Shaping the Future of Feminist Psychology, pp. 1-14, (1997); Wyche K.F., Teaching the psychology of women courses in another discipline: The case of African American studies, Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, pp. 69-77, (1998); Yepez M.E., An observation of gender-specific teacher behavior in the ESL classroom, Sex Roles, 30, pp. 121-133, (1994)
Nơi xuất bản
Hình thức xuất bản
Article
Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus