CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

Toward a liberal education in medicine

Tác giả

Curry R.H.; Montgomery K.

Năm xuất bản

2010

Source title

Academic Medicine

Số trích dẫn

18

DOI

10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181c8e4a2

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-76549123361&doi=10.1097%2fACM.0b013e3181c8e4a2&partnerID=40&md5=c0de4a3eacfba0247e848edd9cf786c5

Tóm tắt

The central thesis of Abraham Flexner's analyses of North American and European medical education was that the university is essential to the provision of a medical education. The authors invoke the spirit of Flexner to envision further contributions of the university at large to undergraduate medical education. Medical curricula now include elements of a variety of other disciplines that are better represented in other parts of the university. Most schools, however, even those closely affiliated with a comprehensive university, do not take full advantage of these resources, nor do they offer sufficient opportunities for students to pursue individualized interests and learning goals.Medical school now plays a different role in the education of physicians than it did a century ago-it remains the definitive, but is no longer the ultimate, stage in a continuum involving college, professional, postgraduate, and continuing education. The authors explore the medical school years as an opportunity for a liberal education in medicine. Beyond the assurance of competence in core knowledge, skills, and perspectives, this model places more emphasis on nurturing students' intellectual curiosity about phenomena of illness and disease, their understanding of the human condition, and their exploration of the many other disciplines related to medicine and the life sciences. A richer, broader education can be achieved through more flexible and individualized paths to the MD and facilitated by realizing medical schools' full academic citizenship in the university. Copyright © by the Association of American Medicel Collage.

Từ khóa

Tài liệu tham khảo

Flexner A., Medical education in the United States and Canada: A report to the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Bulletin No. 4, (1910); Whitcomb M.E., Nutter D.O., Learning Medicine in the 21st Century, (2002); Ludmerer K.M., Learning to Heal: The Development of American Medical Education, (1985); Flexner A., Medical Education: A Comparative Study, (1925); Peabody F.W., The care of the patient, JAMA, 88, pp. 877-882, (1927); Cooke M., Irby D.M., Sullivan W., Ludmerer K.M., American medical education 100 years after the Flexner Report, N Engl J Med., 355, pp. 1339-1344, (2006); Henderson L.J., Physician and patient as a social system, N Engl J Med., 212, pp. 819-823, (1935); Engel G.L., The need for a new medical model: A challenge for biomedicine, Science, 196, pp. 129-136, (1977); What Is Liberal Education?; Knowles M., Andragogy in Action, (1984); Physicians for the twenty-first century, J Med Educ, 59, 11 PART 2, pp. 1-208, (1984); Commentary on the report of the panel on the general professional education of the physician and college preparation for medicine, J Med Educ, 61, pp. 347-352, (1986); Odegaard C.E., Towards an improved dialogue, The Task of Medicine: Dialogue at Wickenburg, (1988); Whitcomb M.E., The general professional education of the physician, Acad Med, 81, pp. 1015-1016, (2006); Kumagai A.K., Lypson M.L., Beyond cultural competence: Critical consciousness, social justice and multicultural education, Acad Med, 84, pp. 782-787, (2009); Fox R.C., Cultural competence and the culture of medicine, N Engl J Med., 353, pp. 1316-1319, (2005); Emanuel E.J., Changing premedical requirements and the medical curriculum, JAMA, 296, pp. 1128-1131, (2006); Scientific Foundations for Future Physicians, (2009); Nuland S.B., The medical school and the university, The Uncertain Art: Thoughts of A Life in Medicine, pp. 20-27, (2008); Viseltear A.J., Milton C., Winternitz and the Yale Institute of Human Relations: A brief chapter in the history of social medicine, Yale J Biol Med, 57, pp. 869-889, (1984); Stowe L.M., The Stanford Plan: An educational continuum for medicine, J Med Educ, 34, pp. 1059-1069, (1959); Cuban L., Change without reform: The case of Stanford University School of Medicine, 1908-1990, Am Educ Res J, 34, pp. 83-122, (1997); Hatem D.S., Barrett S.V., Hewson M., Steele D., Purwono U., Smith R., Teaching the medical interview: Methods and key learning issues in a faculty development course, J Gen Intern Med, 22, pp. 1718-1724, (2007); Hunter K.M., Eating the curriculum, Acad Med, 72, pp. 167-172, (1997); Van Matre R.M., Nampiaparampil D.E., Curry R.H., Kirschner K.L., Technical standards for the education of physicians with physical disabilities: Perspectives of medical students, residents, and attending physicians, Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 83, pp. 54-60, (2004); Gunderman R.B., Competency-based training: Conformity and the pursuit of educational excellence, Radiology, 252, pp. 324-326, (2009); McNeely I.F., Medicine on a grand scale, Rudolf Virchow, Liberalism, and the Public Health, (2002); Brandt A.M., Gardner M., Antagonism and accommodation: Interpreting the relationship between public health and medicine in the United States during the 20th century, Am J Public Health, 90, pp. 707-715, (2000); Kraus C.K., Suarez T.A., Is there a doctor in the house? . . . or the Senate? Physicians in US Congress, 1960 -2004, JAMA, 292, pp. 2125-2129, (2004); Directory of American Medical Education 2008-2009, (2008); The Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education

Nơi xuất bản

Lippincott Williams and Wilkins

Hình thức xuất bản

Article

Open Access

All Open Access; Bronze Open Access

Nguồn

Scopus