CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

The role of grade sensitivity in explaining the gender imbalance in undergraduate economics

Tác giả

Rask K.; Tiefenthaler J.

Năm xuất bản

2008

Source title

Economics of Education Review

Số trích dẫn

DOI

10.1016/j.econedurev.2007.09.010

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-55949095225&doi=10.1016%2fj.econedurev.2007.09.010&partnerID=40&md5=a736a402b0278ecc08b3757ad57ae525

Tóm tắt

There is a gender imbalance in undergraduate economics departments with most departments educating a strong majority of young men. This imbalance has led many economists to ponder the question of why relatively few women choose to take courses and major in economics. Our hypothesis is that the gender imbalance in undergraduate economics, particularly at institutions with traditional liberal arts curriculums, is partly explained by women's greater sensitivity to grades, particularly lower grades. Students choose their majors based on both their interests and their abilities. The literature indicates that the grade a student receives in an introductory class relative to grades received in other departments is one of the strongest predictors of whether or not the student chooses to enroll in more courses in the discipline. However, our hypothesis is that men who take economics courses are less responsive to this signal than are women. As a result, men who do poorly in economics are more likely to continue in the major. Women who do poorly, in contrast, are more likely to abandon economics and pursue a different major. Our results, generated from 16 years of data from a liberal arts college where economics is one of the most popular majors, support this hypothesis. The overall economics GPA for female majors is significantly higher than that for males and male students dominate the bottom of the grade distribution. Finally, results from the estimation of a series of selection models of the decision to take more economics courses indicate that, holding other characteristics constant, women are more responsive to the relative grade received than are men. © 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Từ khóa

Demand for schooling; Educational economics

Tài liệu tham khảo

Anderson G., Benjamin D., Fuss M., The determinants of success in university introductory economics courses, Journal of Economic Education, Spring, pp. 99-119, (1994); Canes B.J., Rosen H.S., Following in her footsteps? Women's choices of college majors and faculty gender composition, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48, 3, pp. 486-504, (1995); Chizmar J., A discrete-time hazard analysis of the role of gender in persistence in the economics major, Journal of Economic Education, Spring, pp. 107-118, (2000); Dynan K., Rouse C., The underrepresentation of women in economics: A study of undergraduate economics students, Journal of Economic Education, 28, 4, pp. 350-368, (1997); Horvath J., Beaudin B., Wright S., Persisting in the introductory economics course: An exploration of gender differences, Journal of Economic Education, Spring, pp. 101-108, (1992); Neumark D., Gardecki R., Women helping women? Role-model and mentoring effects on female Ph.D. students in economics, Journal of Human Resources, 33, pp. 220-246, (1998); Rask K.N., Bailey E., Are faculty role models? Evidence from major choice in an undergraduate institution, Journal of Economic Education, 33, 2, pp. 99-124, (2002); Robb R., Robb A.L., Gender and the study of economics, Journal of Economic Education, Winter, pp. 3-19, (1999); Sabot R., Wakeman-Linn J., Grade inflation and course choice, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Winter, pp. 159-170, (1991); Tay R., Students' performance in economics: Does the norm hold across cultural and institutional settings?, Journal of Economic Education, Fall, pp. 291-301, (1994)