CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

Educating for well-being and autonomy

Tác giả

Cuypers S.E.; Haji I.

Năm xuất bản

2008

Source title

Theory and Research in Education

Số trích dẫn

DOI

10.1177/1477878507086731

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84997995809&doi=10.1177%2f1477878507086731&partnerID=40&md5=cb1c5f8f2da884a410087014879af36d

Tóm tắt

Liberals champion the view that promoting autonomy — seeing to it that our children develop into individuals who are self-governing in the conduct of their lives — is a vital aim of education, though one generally accredited as being subsidiary to well-being. Our prime goal in this article is to provide a partial validation of this liberal ideal against the backdrop of a freedom-sensitive attitudinal hedonism — our favored life-ranking axiology.We propose that there is a pivotal connection between the concept of maximizing well-being and another concept central in the philosophy of education and in the literature on free agency: the concept of our springs of action, such as our desires or beliefs, being truly our own' or, alternatively, autonomous. We suggest that it is the freedom that moral responsibility requires that bridges the overarching aim of securing well-being, on the one hand, and the subsidiary aim of promoting autonomy, on the other. © 2008, SAGE Publications. All rights reserved.

Từ khóa

attitudinal hedonism; autonomy; educational aims; freedom; liberal education; well-being

Tài liệu tham khảo

Adams R.M., Finite and Infinite Goods: A Framework for Ethics, (1999); Archard D., Children', pp. 91-111, (2003); Benn S.I., Freedom, autonomy and the concept of a person, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 76, pp. 109-130, (1976); Bonnett M., Cuypers S.E., Autonomy and authenticity in education', pp. 326-340, (2003); Callan E., Autonomy, child-rearing, and good lives', pp. 118-141, (2002); Callan E., White J., Liberalism and communitarianism', pp. 95-109, (2003); Cuypers S.E., Self-Identity and PersonalAutonomy.AnAnalyticalAnthropology, (2001); Cuypers S.E., Educating for authenticity:The paradox of moral education Revisited, (2008); Cuypers S.E., Haji I., Authentic education and moral responsibility, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 24, pp. 78-94, (2007); Dearden R.F., Happiness and education, pp. 93-110, (1972); Feldman F., Adjusting utility for justice: A consequentialist reply to the objection from justice, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 55, pp. 567-585, (1995); Feldman F., Basic intrinsic value, Philosophical Studies, 99, pp. 319-346, (2000); Feldman F., Pleasure and the Good Life: Concerning the Nature, Varieties, and Plausibility of Hedonism, (2004); Fischer J.M., Ravizza M., Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility, (1998); Frankfurt H.G., Freedom of the will and the concept of a person, Journal of Philosophy, 68, pp. 5-20, (1971); Ginet C., In defense of the principle of alternative possibilities:Why I don't find Frankfurt's argument convincing, Philosophical Perspectives, 10, pp. 403-441, (1996); Grau C.h., Philosophers Explore The Matrix, (2005); Griffin J., Well-Being: Its Meaning, Measurement, and Moral Importance, (1986); Haji I., Moral Appraisability. Puzzles, Proposals, and Perplexities, (1998); Haji I., Freedom, hedonism, and the intrinsic value of lives, Philosophical Topics, 32, pp. 131-151, (2004); Haji I., Incompatibilism's threat to worldly value: Source incompatibilism, desert, and pleasure, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research; Haji I., Cuypers S.E., Libertarian free will and CNC manipulation', Dialectica, International Journal of Philosophy, 55, pp. 221-238, (2001); Haji I., Cuypers S.E., Moral responsibility and the problem of manipulation reconsidered, International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 12, pp. 439-464, (2004); Kagan S., Normative Ethics, (1998); Lemos N., Intrinsic Value, (1994); Marples R., Well-Being as an Aim of Education', pp. 133-144, (1999); Mele A.R., Autonomous Agents: From Self-Control to Autonomy, (1995); Mele A.R., Free Will and Luck, (2006); Moore G.E., Principia Ethica, (1903); Mulhall S., Swift A., Liberals and Communitarians, (1996); Nozick R., Anarchy, State, and Utopia, (1974); Oakley J., Morality and the Emotions, (1992); Parfit D., Reasons and Persons, (1984); Peters R.S., The justification of education, pp. 86-118, (1973); Peters R.S., Freedom and the development of the free man, pp. 11-31, (1973); Sumner L.W., Welfare, Happiness, and Ethics, (1996); van Inwagen P., An Essay on Free Will, (1983); White J., The Aims of Education Restated, (1982); White J., Education and the Good Life. Beyond the National Curriculum, (1990); White J., In defence of liberal aims in education', pp. 185-200, (1999); White J., Light on personal well-being, Journal of Philosophy of Education, 36, pp. 661-669, (2002); Winch C.h., Strong autonomy and education, EducationalTheory, 52, pp. 27-41, (2002); Winch C.h., Gingell J., Key Concepts in the Philosophy of Education, (1999); Zimmerman M.J., The Nature of Intrinsic Value, (2001); Zimmerman M.J., Instrinsic vs. extrinsic value, (2004)