CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

Dialogue and Exchange of Information about Grade Inflation can Counteract its Effects

Tác giả

Barriga A.Q.; Cooper E.K.; Gawelek M.A.; Butela K.; Johnson E.

Năm xuất bản

2008

Source title

College Teaching

Số trích dẫn

5

DOI

10.3200/CTCH.56.4.201-209

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84876114173&doi=10.3200%2fCTCH.56.4.201-209&partnerID=40&md5=c86355f7a892749438aa477a1cdc2735

Tóm tắt

This investigation documents an intervention that successfully counteracted a grade inflation trend at a small, Catholic, liberal arts university in the eastern United States. The intervention produced a significant drop in grades awarded by full-time faculty, but not by adjunct faculty who were not yet included in the intervention. Institutional factors affecting grade inflation (i.e., class size, course level, academic discipline, day and semester of delivery) were also analyzed before and after the intervention. © 2008, Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Từ khóa

achievement; assessment; college students; grade inflation; grading practices

Tài liệu tham khảo

Boretz E., Grade inflation and the myth of student consumerism, College Teaching, 52, 2, pp. 42-51, (2004); Brickell H., Adults in the classroom, (1992); Equivalence tables, (2004); Cross L.H., Frary R.B., Weber L.J., College grading, College Teaching, 41, 2, pp. 143-148, (1993); Darkenwald G.G., Novak R.J., Classroom age composition and academic achievement in college, Adult Education Quarterly, 47, pp. 108-117, (1997); Gose B., Efforts to curb grade inflation get an F from many critics, Chronicle of Higher Education, 43, pp. 1-6, (1997); Greenwald A.G., Gillmore G.M., Grading leniency is a removeable contaminant of student ratings, American Psychologist, 52, pp. 1209-1217, (1997); Hoffman M.L., Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice, (2000); Holden C., Fighting grade inflation, Science, 264, (1994); Kohn A., The dangerous myth of grade inflation, Chronicle of Higher Education, 49, (2002); Lanning W., Perkins P., Grade inflation: A consideration of additional causes, Journal of Instructional Psychology, 22, pp. 163-168, (1995); Mansfield H.C., Grade inflation: It's time to face the facts, Chronicle of Higher Education, 47, (2001); Milgram S., Obedience to authority, (1974); Mitchell L.C., Inflation isn't the only thing wrong with grading, Chronicle of Higher Education, 44, (1998); Nagle B., A proposal for dealing with grade inflation: The Relative Performance Index, Journal of Education for Business, 74, pp. 40-43, (1998); Rosnow R.L., Rosenthal R., Effect sizes for experimenting psychologists, Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, pp. 221-237, (2003); Rosovsky H., Hartley M., Evaluation and the academy: Are we doing the right thing?, (2002); Schneider W., Domain-specific knowledge and memory performance in children, Educational Psychology Review, 5, pp. 257-274, (1993); Shea C., Grade inflation's consequences, Chronicle of Higher Education, 40, pp. A45-A46, (1994); Sonner B.S., A is for "adjunct": Examining grade inflation in higher education, Journal of Education for Business, 76, pp. 5-7, (2000); Spinks N., Wells B., Trends in the employment process: Resumes and job application letters, Career Development International, 4, pp. 40-45, (1999); Summerville R.M., Ridley D.R., Maris T.L., Grade inflation: The case of urban colleges and universities, College Teaching, 38, 1, pp. 33-38, (1990); Archibold R.C., Just because the grades are up, are Princeton students smarter? New York Times, (1998); Birnbaum R., Factors related to university grade inflation, Journal of Higher Education, 48, pp. 519-539, (1977)

Nơi xuất bản

Taylor and Francis Ltd.

Hình thức xuất bản

Article

Open Access

Nguồn

Scopus