CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
Online science learning: Best practices and technologies
Tác giả
Downing K.F.; Holtz J.K.; Spikes W.F.
Năm xuất bản
2008
Source title
Online Science Learning: Best Practices and Technologies
Số trích dẫn
5
DOI
10.4018/978-1-59904-986-1
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
The continued growth in general studies and liberal arts and science programs online has led to a rise in the number of students whose science learning experiences are web-based. However, little is known about what is actually going on in web-based science courses at the level of the disciplines within liberal arts and sciences or the corresponding course design features. Online Science Learning: Best Practices and Technologies reviews trends and efforts in web-based science instruction and evaluates contemporary philosophies and pedagogies of online science instruction. This title on an emergent and vital area of education clearly demonstrates how to enrich the academic character and quality of web-based science instruction. © 2008 by IGI Global. All rights reserved.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bell R., Tight M., Open Universities: A British Tradition?, (1993); Guri-Rosenblit S., Distance education" and "e-learning": Not the same thing, Higher Education, 49, 4, pp. 467-493, (2005); Bateman I., Willis K., Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method In the US, (1999); Bush V., Science, the Endless Frontier, (1945); Clark I., James P., Blended learning: An approach to delivering science courses online, Paper Presented At Breaking Down Boundaries: A Conference On the International Experience In Open, (2005); The World Bank Project P076159, (2002); The World Bank Project P075829, (2003); The World Bank Project P050474, (2001); The World Bank Project P050945, (2000); The World Bank Project P082999, (2004); The World Bank Project P075387, (2004); British Council Russia, (2006); The World Bank Project P071881, (2002); Holliman R., Scanlon E., Mediating Science Learning Through Information and Communications Technology, (2004); Juma C., Engineering in international development: Linking with infrastructure investments in Africa, Science & Technology For Development, (2007); The World Bank Project P068271, (2002); The World Bank Project P095514, (2007); Lindholm P., Commercialization of science: A key landmark for an efficient national innovation system, Science & Technology For Development, (2007); Middle Eastern Students Face New Obstacles In U.S. Higher Education, (2007); The World Bank Project P08513, (2006); The World Bank Project P093806, (2007); (2007); Rich D.C., Pitman A.J., Gosper M., Jacobson C., Restructuring of Australian higher education: Information technology in geography teaching and, Australian Geographer, 28, 2, (1999); The World Bank Project P055232, (2003); Sarbib J.L., Special Policy Forum Report: The Middle East and The World Bank, (2002); The World Bank Project P098496, (2007); (2007); Schulman S., Trouble "the Endless Frontier": Science, Invention and the Erosion of The Technological Commons, (2002); World Bank, (2006); DIC, (2007); Integrating ICT Into Education: Lessons Learned, (2004); Middle East Partnership Initiative Announces Four New Awards, (2006); Watkins A., Osifo-Dawodu E., Ehst M., Cisse B., Building Science, Technology, and Innovation Capacity: Turning Ideas Into Actions, Science & Technology For Development, (2007); Watson R., Crawford M., Farley S., Strategic approaches to science and technology in development, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3026, (2003); College learning for the new global century, National Leadership Council For Liberal Education & America's Promise (LEAP), (2007); National Defense Education and Innovation Initiative: Meeting America's Economic and Security Challenges In the 21st Century, (2006); Altschud R.A., US science education: The view from a practicing scientist, Review of Policy Research, 20, 4, pp. 635-645, (2003); Bapi R.S., Pammi V.S.C., Miyapuram K.P., Ahmed A., Investigation of sequence learning: A cognitive and computational neuroscience perspective, Current Science, 89, pp. 1690-1698, (2005); Beghetto R., Scientifically based research, ERIC Clearinghouse On Educational Management, (2003); Edelson D.C., Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriciulm design, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8, 3-4, pp. 391-450, (1999); Fishman L., Feelings and beliefs, The Flight From Science and Reason, (1996); Gobet F., Lane P.C.R., Croker S., Cheng P.C.H., Jones G., Oliver I., Pine J.M., Chunking mechanisms in human learning, Trends In Cognitive Sciences, 5, pp. 236-243, (2001); Good T.L., Brophy J.E., Educational Psychology: A Realistic Approach, (1990); Gross P., Politicizing Science Education, (2000); Holliman R., Scanlon E., Mediating Science Learning Through Information and Communications Technology, (2004); Holtz J.K., Effect of graduate medical education on the problem finding and divergent thinking abilities of resident physicians, Dissertation Abstracts International, (2002); Houle C.O., The Inquiring Mind: A Study of the Adult Who Continues to Learn, (1961); Kirschner P.A., Sweller J., Clark R.E., Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching, Educational Psychologist, 41, 2, pp. 75-86, (2006); Lawson A.E., The Neurological Basis of Learning, Development and Discovery, (2003); Lemonick M.D., Are We Losing Our Edge? Time Online, (2006); Lowell B.L., Projected Numbers of Foreign Computer and Engineering Workers Under the Senate's Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act, (2006); Martens R., Bastiaens T., Kirschner P.A., New learning design in distance education: The impact on student perception and motivation, Distance Education, 28, 1, pp. 81-93, (2007); Matthews M.R., Constructivism and science education: A further appraisal, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 11, 2, pp. 121-126, (2002); Mergel B., Instructional Design and Learning Theory, (1998); Miller G.A., The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information, Psychological Review, 63, pp. 81-97, (1956); O'Lawrence H., An overview of the influences of distance learning on adult learners, Journal of Education and Human Development, 1, 1, (2007); Ormrod J.E., Human Learning, (1999); Osborne J., Hennessy S., Report 6: Literature Review In Science Education and The Role of ICT: Promise, Problems and Future Directions, (2006); Quintana C., Krajcik J., Soloway E., Scaffolding design guidelines for learnercentered software environments, Paper Presented At the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, (2002); Rezaei A.R., Katz L., Using computer assisted instruction to compare the inventive model and the radical constructivist approach to teaching physics, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 11, 4, pp. 367-380, (2002); Rieber R.W., Robinson D.K., The Essential Vygotsky, (2004); Roth W.M., Ethnomethodology and the r/evolution of science education, Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 5, 2, pp. 185-198, (2005); Roth W.M., Barton A.C., Rethinking Scientific Literacy, (2004); Rutherford F.J., The 2005 Paul F-Brandwein lecture: Is our past our future? Thoughts on the next 50 years of science education reform in the light of judgments on the past 50 years, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14, 4, pp. 367-386, (2005); Ryan J., The Perverse Incentives of the No Child Left Behind Act, (2004); Scanlon E., Murphy P., Thomas J., Whitelegg E., Reconsidering Science Learning, (2004); Skinner B.F., About Behaviorism, (1976); Sokal A., Bricmont J., Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals' Abuse of Science, (1998); Sternberg R.J., Beyond IQ, (1984); Sweller J., Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning, Cognitive Science, 12, pp. 257-285, (1988); Symonds W.C., America's Failure In Science Education. Business Week On-Line, (2004); Valverde G.A., Schmidt W.H., Refocusing U.S. Math and Science Education. Issues Online In Science and Technology, 14, 2, (2006); Wadhwa V., Gereffi G., Rissing B., Ong R., Where the engineers are, Issues in Science and Technology, Spring, (2007); Wood D., Wood H., Vygotsky, tutoring and learning, Oxford Review of Education, 22, 1, pp. 5-16, (1996); Alberts B., A wakeup call for science faculty, Cell, 123, 5, pp. 739-741, (2005); Barnett J., Kitto R., Mind the gap: A proposal for science, mathematics, and technology education, Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 4, 4, pp. 529-535, (2004); Berge Z., Clark T., Virtual Schools: Planning For Success, (2005); Bitan-Friedlander N., Dreyfus A., Milgrom Z., Types of "teachers in training": The reactions of primary school science teachers when confronted with the task of implementing an innovation, Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 6, pp. 607-619, (2004); Chan M.S., Black J.B., Direct-manipulation animation: Incorporating the haptic channel in the learning process to support middle school students in science learning and mental model acquisition, Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences, pp. 64-70, (2006); Chen H., Yu C., Chang C., E-Homebook system: A Web-based interactive education interface, Computer Education, 49, 2, pp. 160-175, (2007); Clark K., Jamison T., Sprague D., Digital study groups: Online learning environments in middle school, Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 3, 4, pp. 1-12, (2005); Clegg T., Gardner C., Williams O., Kolodner J., Promoting learning in informal learning environments, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference On Learning Sciences, pp. 92-98, (2006); Cruz-Neira C., Lindahl G., A voyage into virtual reality: Networking our VR lab to Iowa middle schools and high schools, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 20, 2, pp. 16-19, (2000); Damast A., Be True to Your Cyberschool. Business Week Online (April 19), (2007); Davis N., Roblyer M., Preparing teachers for the "schools that technology built": Evaluation of a program to train teachers for virtual schooling, Journal of Research On Technology In Education, 37, 4, pp. 399-408, (2005); de la Chica S., SciNews online: Scaffolding the construction of scientific explanation, In Extended Abstracts On Human Factors In Computing Systems, pp. 2183-2188, (2007); Dias B., Lourenco N., Maio A., Marques C., Peralta L., Popovici G., Popovici N., Santos J., Sil J., Introduction to Particle Physics At High School With a Remote Experiment, (2006); State of Michigan Adopts Online Course Requirement For High Schoolers, (2006); Donovan-White C., Teaching the Nature of Science. ACASEJAEESA, 1, 7, (2006); Dunsworth Q., Atkinson R.K., Fostering multimedia learning of science: Exploring the role of an animated agent's image, Computer Education, 49, 3, pp. 677-690, (2007); Fait H., Hsi S., From playful exhibits to LOM: Lessons from building an Exploratorium digital library, Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference On Digital Libraries, pp. 207-212, (2005); Flynn J., Selecting Computer-based High School Science Curricula: A Guide For Teachers, (2004); Forsyth L., Mulholland G., Schaverien L., Towards systemic professional development: Teachers as e-designers, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference On Learning Sciences, (2004); Frailich M., Kesner M., Hofstein A., The influence of Web-based chemistry learning on students' perceptions, attitudes, and achievements, Research In Science & Technological Education, 25, 2, (2007); Gosmire D., Grady M., 10 questions to answer for technology to succeed in your school, The Education Digest, 72, 8, pp. 12-18, (2007); Hennessy S., Wishart J., Whitelock D., Deaney R., Brawn R., la Velle L., McFarlane A., Ruthven K., Winterbottom M., Pedagogical approaches for technologyintegrated science teaching, Computers and Education, 48, 1, pp. 137-152, (2006); Hipkins R., Barker M., Bolstad R., Teaching the "nature of science": Modest adaptations or radical reconceptions?, International Journal of Science Education, 27, 4, pp. 243-254, (2005); Ilomaki L., Lakkala M., Paavola S., Case studies of learning objects used in school settings, Learning, Media & Technology, 31, 3, pp. 249-267, (2006); Kay R., Knaack L., Evaluating the use of learning objects for secondary school science, Journal of Computers In Mathematics and Science Teaching, 26, 4, pp. 261-289, (2007); Kenyon L., Kuhn L., Reiser B.J., Using students' epistemologies of science to guide the practice of argumentation, Proceedings of the 7th International Conferenceon Learning Sciences, pp. 321-327, (2006); Lakkala M., Ilomaki L., Palonen T., Implementing virtual, collaborative inquiry practices in a middle school context, Behaviour & Information Technology, 26, 1, pp. 37-53, (2007); Lamb A., Callison D., Key words in instruction, Online Learning and Virtual Schools, 21, 9, pp. 29-35, (2005); Linn M.C., Davis E.A., Bell P., Internet Environments For Science Education, (2004); Lowes S., Online teaching and classroom change: The impact of virtual high school on its teachers and their schools, A Synthesis of New Research In K-12 Online Learning, pp. 24-26, (2005); Madigan E., Goodfellow M., The influence of family income and parent education on digital access: Implications for first-year college students, Sociological Viewpoints, 21, pp. 53-62, (2005); Magnusson S.J., Palincsar A.S., Hapgood S., Lomangino A., How should learning be structured in inquiry-based science instruction?: Investigating the interplay of 1st- and 2nd-hand investigations, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference On Learning Sciences, pp. 318-325, (2004); McCombs G., Ufnar J., Shepard V., The virtual scientist: Connecting university scientists to the K-12 classroom through videoconferencing, Advances In Physiological Education, 31, pp. 62-66, (2007); McFarlane A., ICT and primary science: Where are we going?, Teaching and Learning Primary Science With ICT, pp. 175-186, (2006); Metcalf S.J., TEEMSS2: Technology enhanced elementary math and science-year 1 report, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference On Learning Sciences, pp. 474-480, (2006); Millwood K.A., A comparison of students' conceptions about the nature of argumentation in school and professional science, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference On Learning Sciences, pp. 962-963, (2006); Mupinga D.M., Distance Education In High Schools. the Clearing House, 78(3), 105-108, (2005); T H E Journal, 33, 17, (2006); Osborne J., Hennessy S., Report 6: Literature review in science education and the role of ICT: Promise, Problems and Future Directions, (2006); Digital Video With Class, (2007); Quintana C., Zhang M., IdeaKeeper notepads: Scaffolding digital library information analysis in online inquiry, In Extended Abstracts On Human Factors In Computing Systems, pp. 1329-1332, (2004); Recker M., Dorward J., Dawson D., Halioris S., Liu Y., Mao X., Palmer B., Park J., You Can Lead a Horse to Water: Teacher Development and Use of Digital Library Resources, Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference On Digital Libraries, pp. 1-8, (2005); Revenaugh M., K-8 virtual schools: A glimpse into the future, Educational Leadership, 63, 4, pp. 60-64, (2005); Roblyer M., Virtually successful: Defeating the dropout problem through online school programs, Phi Delta Kappan, 88, 1, (2006); Roblyer M., Marshall J.C., Predicting success of virtual high school students: Preliminary results from an Educational Success Prediction Instrument, Journal of Research and Technology In Education, 35, 2, pp. 241-255, (2002); Roseman J., Koppal M., Ensuring that college graduates are science literate: Implications of K-12 benchmarks and standards, Handbook of College Science Teaching, pp. 325-349, (2006); Ryder J., School science education for citizenship: Strategies for teaching about the epistemology of science, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34, 6, pp. 637-658, (2002); Sanders T., No time to waste: The vital role of college and university leaders in improving science and mathematics education, Paper Presented At the Invitational Conference On Teacher Preparation and Institutions of Higher Education: Mathematics and Science Content Knowledge, (2004); Schneider R., Supporting science teacher thinking through curriculum materials, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference On Learning Sciences, pp. 674-680, (2006); Scott L.A., Zimmerman R., Chang H., Heitzman M., Krajcik J., McNeill K.L., Quintana C., Soloway E., Chemation: A handheld chemistry modeling and animation tool, Proceeding of the 2004 Conference On Interaction Design and Children: Building a Community, pp. 145-146, (2004); Squire K., Barnett M., Grant J.M., Higginbotham T., Electromagnetism supercharged!: Learning physics with digital simulation games, International Conference On Learning Sciences, pp. 513-520, (2004); Steinkuehler C., Chmiel M., Fostering scientific habits of mind in the context of online play, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference On Learning Sciences, pp. 723-729, (2006); Sturgeon J., Creating an effective virtual school program, District Administration Magazine, (2007); Taylor R.S., O'Reilly T., Sinclair G.P., McNamara D.S., Enhancing learning of expository science texts in a remedial reading classroom via iSTART, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference On Learning Sciences, pp. 765-770, (2006); Thompson M.M., Online K-12 education: Opportunities for collaboration with higher-education, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 10, 3, (2006); Tsui C., Treagust D., Understanding genetics: Analysis of secondary students' conceptual status, Journal of Research In Science Teaching, 44, 2, pp. 205-235, (2007); Wallace R.M., The Web in high school science teaching: Constructing a technology in practice, In Extended Abstracts On Human Factors In Computing Systems, pp. 85-86, (2000); Wang S.K., Reeves T.C., The effects of a Web-based learning environment on student motivation in a high school earth science course, Educational Technology Research and Development, 54, 6, pp. 597-621, (2006); Woszczynski A.B., CyberTech I: Online introduction to computer science course for high school students, SIGCSE Bulletin, 38, 1, pp. 153-157, (2006); Bermejo S., Cooperative electronic learning in virtual laboratories through forums, IEEE Transactions On Education, 48, 1, pp. 140-149, (2005); Boyle A., Conchie S., Maguire S., Martin A., Milsom C., Nash R., Et al., Fieldwork is good? The student experience of field courses, Planet, pp. 48-51, (2003); Christian C.A., Scientists' role in educational content development, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12, 1, pp. 31-37, (2003); The College Blue Book: Distance Learning Programs, (2004); Couture M., Realism in the design process and credibility of a simulation-based virtual laboratory, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, pp. 40-49, (2004); Dalgarno B., Bishop A.G., Bedgood D.R., The Potential Of Virtual Laboratories for Distance Education Science Teaching: Reflections From The Development And Evaluation Of A Virtual Chemistry Laboratory, UniServe Science Improving Learning Outcomes Conference, pp. 90-95, (2003); Donert K., The Virtual Montana Project: Using open and distance learning to support fieldwork-based activities, International Journal of Fieldwork Studies, 1, 1, (2003); Edelson D.C., Learning-for-use: A framework for the design of technology-supported inquiry activities, Journal of Research In Science Teaching, 38, 3, pp. 355-385, (2001); Elgamagl A., Fraser M., McMartin F., On-line educational shake table experiments, Journal of Professional Issues In Engineering Education & Practice, 131, 1, pp. 41-49, (2005); Evans C., Gibbons N.J., Shah K., Virtual learning in the biological sciences: Pitfalls of simply "putting notes on the Web, Computers & Education, 43, 1-2, pp. 49-63, (2004); Fernandez G., Lecture Notes In Computer Science, (2003); Holliman R., Scanlon E., Mediating Science Learning Through Information and Communications Technology, (2004); Huang C., Virtual labs: E-learning for tomorrow, PLoS Biology, 2, 6, (2004); Kim M., Hannafin M., Designing online learning environments to support scientific inquiry, The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 5, 1, pp. 1-10, (2004); Kin C.C., Using virtual instruments to develop a real-time, Web-based laboratory, International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 2, 1, pp. 18-30, (2004); Linn M., Davis E., Bell P., Internet Environments For Science Education, (2004); Moehr J.R., Protti D.J., Lau F.Y., Grimm N.A., Project based experiential distance education: An oxymoron?, International Journal of Medical Informatics, 73, 2, pp. 157-165, (2004); How Students Learn: History, Mathematics and Science In the Classroom, (2005); Osborne J., Hennessy S., Report 6: Literature Review In Science Education and The Role of ICT: Promise, Problems and Future Directions (No. 6), (2006); Ramasundaram V., Grunwald S., Mangeot A., Comerford N.B., Bliss C.M., Development of an environmental virtual field laboratory, Computers and Education, 45, pp. 21-34, (2005); Ross S., Scanlon E., Open Science: Distance Teaching and Open Learning of Science Subjects, (1995); Sala N., Hypermedia modules for distance education and virtual university: Some examples, International Journal of Distance Learning Technologies, 1, 1, pp. 78-97, (2003); Scanlon E., Colwell C., Cooper M., Di Paolo T., Remote experiments, re-versioning and re-thinking science learning, Computers & Education, 43, 3-4, pp. 153-163, (2004); Scanlon E., Murphy P., Thomas J., Whitelegg E., Reconsidering Science Learning, (2004); Sormunen E., Pennanen S., The challenge of automated tutoring in web-based learning environments for IR instruction, Information Research, 9, 2, (2004); Stevens K., Two Canadian approaches to teaching biology, chemistry, mathematics and physics to senior high school students in virtual classes, Australasian Science Education Research Association, (1999); Wolfson G.K., Magnuson C.W., Marsom G., Changing the nature of the discourse: Teaching field seminars online, Journal of Social Work Education, 41, 2, (2005); Young-Suk S., Virtual experiment environments design for science education, International Journal of Distance Learning Technologies, 2, 4, pp. 62-76, (2004); Science For All Americans, (1989); Abd-El-Khalick F., Lederman N.G., The influence of history of science courses on students' views of nature of science, Journal of Research In Science Teaching, 37, 10, pp. 1057-1095, (2000); Aufshnaiter S.V., Welzel M., Learning processes in the field of electricity: Results of a cross age study, Paper Presented At the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, (1997); Report of the Dundee Meeting, (1868); Banks F., McCormick B., A case study of the inter-relationship between science and technology: England 1984-2004, Paper Presented to The PATT-15 Conference In Haarlem, (2005); Barton R., IT in practical work-assessing and increasing the value-added, Practical Work In Science Education: Recent Research Studies, pp. 237-251, (1998); Barton R., Just before nature: The purposes of science and the purposes of opularization in some English popular science journals of the 1860s, Annals of Science, 55, pp. 1-33, (1998); Bateman I., Willis K., Valuing environmental preferences: Theory and practice of the contingent valuation method in the U.S, EU, and Developing Countries, (1999); Bloom B.S., Taxonomy of educational objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain, (1956); Braund M., Reiss M., Towards a more authentic science curriculum: The contribution of out-of-school learning, International Journal of Science Education, 28, 12, pp. 1373-1388, (2006); Carlton F.T., Economic influences upon educational progress in the U.S., 1820-1850, History of Education Quarterly, 7, 2, pp. 260-262, (1906); Chin P., Munby H., Hutchinson N.L., Taylor J., Clark F., Where's the science?: Understanding the form and function of workplace science, Reconsidering Science Learning, pp. 118-134, (2004); Cole S., Voodoo Sociology: Recent Developments In the Sociology of Science, pp. 274-287, (1996); Coles M., What does industry want from science education?, Proceedings of the 8th Symposium of IOSTE, 1, (1997); Couture M., Original article realism in the design process and credibility of a simulation-based virtual laboratory, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 1, pp. 40-49, (2004); Deboer G., A History of Ideas In Science Education: Implications For Practice, (1991); Dillon S., No Test Tubes? Debate On Virtual Science Classes [Electronic Version], (2006); Felder R.M., Brent R., The intellectual development of science and engineering students. 2 teaching to promote growth, Journal of Engineering Education, 93, 4, pp. 279-291, (2004); Felder R.M., Brent R., Understanding student differences, Journal of Engineering Education, 94, 1, pp. 57-72, (2005); Fox K., Authentic alternatives to practical work, School Science Review, 88, 322, pp. 45-51, (2006); Fullick P., Why school science pupils should discuss practical science work online, IDATER On-line Conference: E-Learning In Science and Design and Technology, (2004); Gough N., If this were played upon a stage" school laboratory work as a theatre of representation, Practical Work In Science Education: Recent Research Studies, pp. 69-89, (1998); Gribben J., Science, a History: 1543-2001, (2002); Hegarty-Hazel E., The student laboratory and the science curriculum: A model, The Student Laboratory and The Science Curriculum, pp. 125-189, (1990); Hodson D., Rethinking old ways: Towards a more critical approach to practical work in school science, Studies In Science Education, 22, pp. 85-142, (1993); Hodson D., Laboratory work as scientific method: Three decades of confusion and distortion, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28, 2, pp. 11-135, (1996); Hofstein A., Lunetta V., The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century, Science Education, 88, 1, pp. 28-54, (2003); Houle C.O., The Inquiring Mind: A Study of the Adult Who Continues to Learn, (1961); Jenkins E., The schooling of laboratory science, Practical Work In School Science: Which Way Now?, (1998); Jenkins E., Practical work in school science-Some questions to be answered, Practical Work In Science Education: Recent Research Studies, pp. 19-32, (1999); Kirschner P.A., Sweller J., Clark R.E., Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching, Educational Psychologist, 41, 2, pp. 75-86, (2006); Lawson A.E., The Neurological Basis of Learning, Development and Discovery, (2003); Leach J., Teaching about the world of science in the laboratory, Practical Work In School Science: Which Way Now?, pp. 52-68, (1998); Leach J., Learning science in the laboratory: The importance of epistemological understanding, Practical Work In Science Education: Recent Research Studies, pp. 143-147, (1999); Linn M.C., Davis E.A., Eylon B.-S., The scaffolded knowledge integration framework for instruction, Internet Environments For Science Education, pp. 47-72, (2004); Masters R., Nott M., Implicit knowledge and science practical work in schools, Practical Work In Science Education: Recent Research Studies, pp. 206-219, (1998); Ma J., Nickerson J.V., Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories: A comparative literature review, ACM Computing Surveys, 38, 3, (2006); Matthews M.R., Constructivism and science education: A further appraisal, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 11, 2, pp. 121-126, (2002); Mayer R.E., Learning environments: The case for evidence-based practice and issue-driven research, Educational Psychology Review, 15, 4, pp. 359-366, (2003); Millar R., Rhetoric and reality: What practical work in science education is really for, Practical Work In School Science: Which Way Now?, pp. 16-31, (1998); Millar R., The role of practical work in the teaching and learning of science, Paper Presented At the National Academy of Sciences, (2004); Millar R., Le Marechal J., Tiberghien A., Mapping" the domain: Varieties of practical work, Practical Work In Science Education: Recent Research Studies, pp. 33-59, (1999); Millar R., Tiberghien A., Le Marechal J.F., Varieties of labwork: A way of profiling labwork tasks, Teaching and Learning In the Science Laboratory, pp. 9-20, (2002); Report of the Committee of Ten of the Committee On Secondary School Studies, (1893); Osborne J., Science education without a laboratory?, Practical Work In Science Education: Recent Research Studies, pp. 156-173, (1998); Pekmez E.S., Johnson P., Gott R., Teachers' understanding of the nature and purpose of practical work, Research In Science & Technology Education, 23, 1, pp. 3-23, (2005); Rezaei A.R., Katz L., Using computer assisted instruction to compare the inventive model and the radical constructivist approach to teaching physics, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 11, 4, pp. 367-380, (2002); Ross S., Scanlon E., Open Science: The Distance Teaching and Open Learning of Science Subjects, (1995); Singer S.R., Hilton M.L., Schwiengruber H.A., America's Lab Report: Investigations In School Science, (2005); Slotta J.D., Web-based inquiry science environment, Internet Environments For Science Education, pp. 203-231, (2004); Soloman J., Envisionment in practical work: Helping pupils to imagine concepts while carrying out experiments, Practical Work In Science Education: Recent Research Studies, pp. 63-74, (1999); Towards Knowledge Societies, (2005); Van Marion P., Changing teachers' practise: Practical work in environmental education, Practical Work In Science Education: Recent Research Studies, pp. 250-264, (1999); Wardle J., Virtual science-A practical alternative?, Practical Work In Science Education: Recent Research Studies, pp. 271-281, (1999); Wellington J., Practical work in science: Time for a re-appraisal, Practical Work In School Science: Which Way Now?, pp. 3-15, (1998); Welzel M., von Aufschnaiter C., Schoster A., How to interact with students? The role of teachers in the learning situation, Practical Work In Science Education: Recent Research Studies, pp. 298-313, (1999); Woolnough B., Authentic science in schools, Practical Work In Science Education: Recent Research Studies, pp. 109-125, (1998); Woolnough B., Allsop T., Practical Work In Science, (1985); Youmans E.L., The Culture Demanded By Modern Life; a Series of Addresses and Arguments On the Claims of Scientific Education, (1867); Abari A., Pierre S., Saliah-Hassane H., Laboratory e-notebooks: A learning object-based repository, Journal of STEM Education, 7, 1-2, pp. 15-23, (2006); Anderson T., Social software applications in formal online education, Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference On Advanced Learning Technologies, (2006); Anderson T., Distance Learning-Social Software's Killer Ap?, (2006); Becker K., Using Elluminate in CS, Journal of Computing In Small Colleges, 23, 2, pp. 73-75, (2007); Bermejo S., Cooperative electronic learning in virtual laboratories through forums, IEEE Transactions On Education, 48, 1, pp. 140-149, (2005); Bly S., Keith K.M., Henline P.A., The work of scientists and the building of collaboratories, Paper Presented At the Group 97 International Conference On Supporting Group Work, (1997); Bohne A., Faltin N., Wagner B., Synchronous tele-tutorial support in a remote laboratory for process control, INNOVATIONS 2004: World Innovations In Engineering Education and Research, (2004); Bos N., Olson J.S., Olson G.M., Science On the Net, (2005); Bos N., Zimmerman A., Olson J., Yew J., Yerkie J., Dahl E., Et al., From shared databases to communities of practice: A taxonomy of collaboratories, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 2, (2007); Bower M., Virtual classroom pedagogy, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 38, 1, pp. 148-152, (2006); Bower M., Groupwork activities in synchronous online classroom spaces, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 39, 1, pp. 91-95, (2007); Coppola N.W., Hiltz S.R., Rotter N.G., Becoming a virtual professor: Pedagogical roles and asynchronous learning networks, Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 4, pp. 169-189, (2002); Dalsgaard C., Social Software: E-learning Beyond Learning Management Systems, (2006); Daradoumisa T., Martinez-Mones A., Xhafa F., Alayered framework for evaluating on-line collaborative learning interactions, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64, pp. 622-635, (2006); Dove M.T., Calleja M., Bruin R., Wakelin J., Tucker M.G., Lewis G.J., Et al., The eMinerals collaboratory: Tools and experience, Molecular Simulation, 31, 5, pp. 329-337, (2005); Dove M.T., White T.O., Bruin R., Tucker M.G., Calleja M., Artacho E., Et al., eScience Usability: The EMinerals Experience, (2005); El-Nasr M.S., Smith B.K., Learning through game modding, ACM Computers In Entertainment, 4, 1, (2006); Eom S., The role of the instructors as a determinant of students' satisfaction in university online education, Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference On Advanced Learning Technologies, (2006); Farooq U., Ganoe C.H., Carroll J.M., Giles C.L., Supporting distributed scientific collaboration: Implications for designing the CiteSeer collaboratory, Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii International Conference On System Sciences, (2007); R&D Challenges For Games In Learning, (2006); Fung Y.Y.H., Collaborative online learning: Interaction patterns and limiting factors, Open Learning, 19, 2, pp. 135-149, (2004)
Nơi xuất bản
IGI Global
Hình thức xuất bản
Book
Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus