CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

Proscriptive norms for academic deans: Comparing faculty expectations across institutional and disciplinary boundaries

Tác giả

Bray N.J.

Năm xuất bản

2008

Source title

Journal of Higher Education

Số trích dẫn

DOI

10.1353/jhe.0.0026

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-57349168549&doi=10.1353%2fjhe.0.0026&partnerID=40&md5=01730ebc3cdd4c890342ef5f0945695c

Tóm tắt

This study examines norms faculty members hold for academic deans' behavior. Using a national survey, responses from faculty at Research and Liberal Arts institutions are analyzed. Results indicate eleven norms across three levels of inappropriateness dealing with issues like information sharing and responsiveness. Implications for research and practice are discussed. Copyright © 2008 by The Ohio State University.

Từ khóa

Tài liệu tham khảo

Adams C.S., Roberts S.M., Construction of role and the shaping of organizational culture: A symbolic interactionalist study of collegiate mid-level managers in student affairs, ERIC Document Reproduction Service, (1991); Renewing the academic presidency: Stronger leadership for tougher times, (1996); Austin A.E., Gamson Z.F., Academic workplace: New demands, heightened tensions, (1983); Austin A., Faculty cultures, faculty views, Assessing academic climates and cultures, 68, pp. 61-74, (1990); Bensimon E.M., The social processes through which faculty shape the image of a new president, The Journal of Higher Education, 62, pp. 637-660, (1991); Berger P.L., Luckman T., The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge, (1967); Biglan A., The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas, Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 3, pp. 195-203, (1973); Birnbaum R., How colleges work: The cybernetics of academic organization and leadership, (1988); Birnbaum R., How academic leadership works: Understanding success and failure in the college presidency, (1992); Blackburn R.T., Lawrence J.H., Faculty at work: Motivation, expectation, satisfaction, (1995); Boyer E.L., In search of community, (1990); Braxton J.M., Bayer A.E., Faculty misconduct in collegiate teaching, (1999); Braxton J.M., Hargens L.L., Variation among academic disciplines: Analytical frameworks and research, Higher education: A handbook of theory and research, 11, pp. 1-46, (1996); Bray N.J., Social control of administrative impropriety: An analysis of college and university administrators, Annual Meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, (1999); Bright D.F., Richards M.P., The academic deanship: Individual careers and institutional roles, (2002); Campbell T.I.D., Slaughter S., Faculty and administrators' attitudes toward potential conflicts of interest, commitment, and equity in university - industry relationships, The Journal of Higher Education, 70, pp. 309-352, (1999); A classification of institutions of higher education: A technical report, (1994); Christensen P.N., Rothgerber H., Wood W., Matz D.C., Social norms and identity relevance: A motivational approach to normative behavior, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, pp. 1295-1309, (2004); Cohen M.D., March J.G., Leadership and ambiguity: The American college president, (1974); Daly F., Townsend B.K., Faculty perceptions of the department chair's role in facilitating tenure acquisition, annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Minneapolis, MN. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service, No. ED, pp. 352-912, (1992); Dill D.D., The nature of administrative behavior in higher education, Educational Administration Quarterly, 20, 3, pp. 69-99, (1984); Eckel P.D., The role of shared governance in institutional hard decisions: Enabler or antagonist?, The Review of Higher Education, 24, pp. 15-39, (2000); Fincher C., Theory and research in administrative leadership, Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, 11, pp. 307-336, (1996); Fowler Jr. F.J., Survey research methods, Applied Social Research Methods Series, 1, (1988); Fox J., Applied regression analysis, linear models, and related methods, (1997); Goode W.J., Hatt P.K., Methods of social research, (1952); Groner N.E., Leadership situations in academic departments: Relations among measures of situational favorableness and control, Research in Higher Education, 8, pp. 125-143, (1978); Hearn J.C., Anderson M.S., Conflict in academic departments: A longitudinal analysis, annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, (1998); Jones T.M., Wicks A.C., Convergent stakeholder theory, Academy of Management Review, 24, 2, pp. 206-221, (1999); Kempner K., The search for cultural leaders, The Review of Higher Education, 26, pp. 363-385, (2003); Kezar A., Eckel P.D., Meeting today's governance challenges: A synthesis of the literature and examination of a future agenda for scholarship, The Journal of Higher Education, 75, pp. 371-399, (2004); Kim J., Mueller C.W., Introduction to factor analysis: What it is and how to do it, Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, pp. 7-13, (1978); Krahenbuhl G.S., Building the academic deanship, (2004); Kuh G.D., Whitt E.J., The invisible tapestry: Culture in American colleges and universities, ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, (1988); Macionis J.J., Sociology, (2001); Matczynski T., Lasley T.J., Haberman M., The deanship: How faculty evaluate performance, Journal of Teacher Education, 40, 6, pp. 10-14, (1989); Merton R.K., The sociology of social problems, Contemporary social problems, pp. 3-43, (1976); Montez J.M., Wolverton M., Gmelch W.H., The roles and challenges of deans, The Review of Higher Education, 26, pp. 241-266, (2003); Moody J., Supporting women and minority faculty, Academe, 90, 1, pp. 47-52, (2004); Neumann A., On the making of hard times and good times: The social construction of resource stress, The Journal of Higher Education, 66, pp. 3-31, (1995); Pruitt D.A., Schwartz R.A., Student affairs work as boundary-spanning: An exploratory study, College Student Affairs Journal, 19, 1, pp. 62-87, (1999); Rhoades G., Who's doing it right? Strategic activity in public research universities, The Review of Higher Education, 24, pp. 41-66, (2000); Rowley T.J., Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences, The Academy of Management Review, 22, pp. 887-910, (1997); Ryan D., Deans as individuals-in-organizations, The dilemma of the deanship, pp. 133-176, (1980); Toma J.D., Alternative inquiry paradigms, faculty cultures, and the definition of academic lives, The Journal of Higher Education, 68, pp. 679-705, (1997); Tucker A., Bryan R.A., The academic dean: Dove, dragon, and diplomat, (1991); Weisberg H.F., Bowen B.D., An introduction to survey research and data analysis, (1977); Welsh J.F., Metcalf J., Faculty and administrative support for institutional effectiveness activities: A bridge across the chasm, The Journal of Higher Education, 74, pp. 445-468, (2003); Whetten D.A., Cameron K.S., Administrative effectiveness in higher education, Review of Higher Education, 9, pp. 35-49, (1985); Wolverton M., Gmelch G.H., College deans: Leading from within, (2002); Wolverton M., Gmelch W.H., Montez J., Nies C.T., The changing nature of the academic deanship, 28, 1, (2001); Wolverton M., Wolverton M.L., Gmelch W.H., The impact of role conflict and ambiguity on academic deans, The Journal of Higher Education, 70, pp. 80-106, (2000); Zuckerman H.E., The sociology of science, Handbook of Sociology, pp. 511-574, (1988)