CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …
Tiêu đề
Liberal education, moral education, and religion
Tác giả
Nord W.A.
Năm xuất bản
2007
Source title
The Schooled Heart: Moral Formation in American Higher Education
Số trích dẫn
1
DOI
Liên kết
Tóm tắt
Liberal education comes in various shapes and sizes. I will discuss two historically influential conceptions of liberal education, both of which have clear implications for how we think of moral education. Though their emphases are different, they are, in fact, complementary, and I will argue that an adequate account of moral education requires that we draw on both. I will also argue that serious study of religion is essential to both liberal education and moral education. (What will give this thesis particular punch is that I make this claim regarding public as well as private higher education.) First, however, a few comments about why moral education is such a problem in higher education. © 2007 Baylor University Press.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Rudolph F., Curriculum: A History of the American Undergraduate Course of Study Since 1636, (1977); Kimball B.A., Orators and Philosophers: A History of the Idea of Liberal Education, (1986); Huxley T.H., Science and culture, Cultures in Conflict: Perspectives on the Snow-Leavis Controversy, (1964); Arnold M., Literature and science, The Portable Matthew Arnold, (1980); MacIntyre, After Virtue; Bellah R., Et al., Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life, (1985); Bok, Universities and the Future of America; Bok, Universities and the Future of America; Hunter J.D., Leading children beyond good and evil, First Things, 103, (2000); The Death of Character: Moral Education in a World without Good and Evil, (2000); Hauerwas S., How christian universities contribute to the corruption of youth, Christian Existence Today: Essays on Church, World, and Living in between, (1988); Hauerwas, How Christian Universities Contribute; Hauerwas, How Christian Universities Contribute; Ecclesia P., Pro Texana: Schooling the Heart in the Heart of Texas, pp. 208-214; Kuhn T., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, (1962); Adams E.M., Philosophical education as cultural criticism, Teaching Philosophy, 3, pp. 1-2, (1980); Bok, Universities and the Future of America; Hauerwas S., Pro Ecclesia, Pro Texana; Bok, Universities and the Future of America, pp. 77-78; Political Liberalism; Academic Freedom and Tenure: A Handbook of the American Association of University Professors, (1967); Declaration of Principles; Some observations on ideology, competence, and faculty selections, Academe, 72, (1986); Schwehn, Exiles from Eden; Schwehn, Exiles from Eden; Schwehn, Exiles from Eden; Hauerwas, How Universities Contribute; Rationality and morality, Review of Metaphysics, 46, pp. 683-697, (1993); Emotional intelligence and wisdom, The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 36, pp. 1-14, (1998); The Metaphysics of Self and World, (1991); Veysey, Emergence of the American University; Mill J.S., On liberty, The Essential Works of John Stuart Mill, (1965); McEwan I., Only Love and Then Oblivion, (2001); Graff G., Beyond the Culture Wars, (1992); Blanshard B., The Uses of a Liberal Education and other Talks to Students, (1973); Graff, Beyond the Culture Wars; Frank R.H., Gilovich T., Regan D., Does studying economics inhibit cooperation?, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7, pp. 159-171, (1993); National Content Standards in Economics, (1997); Religion and American Education: Rethinking a National Dilemma, (1995); The Outrageous Idea of Christian Scholarship, (1997); What should religion departments teach?, Theology Today, 46, pp. 369-370, (1990); Blumhofer E., Liberal education and religious studies, Religion, Education, and the American Experience, pp. 9-40, (2002); Religion and American Education, pp. 269-274
Nơi xuất bản
Baylor University Press
Hình thức xuất bản
Book chapter
Open Access
Nguồn
Scopus