CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

Special session - Can philosophy of engineering education improve the practice of engineering education?

Tác giả

Heywood J.; Smith K.A.; McGrann R.

Năm xuất bản

2007

Source title

Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE

Số trích dẫn

DOI

10.1109/FIE.2007.4418223

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-50049134349&doi=10.1109%2fFIE.2007.4418223&partnerID=40&md5=4ca5ba3727ee4719bf3ee148c781f543

Tóm tắt

As practitioners of engineering education, reflecting on our profession, we propose the question: Can philosophy of engineering education improve the practice of engineering education? It is intended to seek through discussion answers to such questions as - Is a philosophy of engineering education distinct from a philosophy of education? What are the "questions" of philosophy of engineering education? How would a philosophy of engineering education differ from the philosophy of science education, and a philosophy of medical education? Is a philosophy of liberal education necessary in a philosophy of engineering education or a re they antithetical? To what extent is a philosophy of education necessary for the design of the curriculum? © 2007 IEEE.

Từ khóa

Tài liệu tham khảo

Sherren D.C., Long T.R., The educators dilemma. What makes Clyde want to learn?, Engineering Education, 63, 3, pp. 188-190, (1972); Furst E.J., The Construction of Evaluation Instruments, (1958); Sinclair G., Tilston W., Improved goals for engineering education, Proceedings Frontiers in Education Conference, pp. 252-258, (1979); van Poolen L.J., A philosophical perspective on design, International Journal of Applied Engineering Education, 5, 3, pp. 319-329, (1989); Self J., From constructionism to deconstructionism. Anticipating trends in educational styles, European Journal of Engineering Education, 22, 3, pp. 295-306, (1997); Jinks R.F., Knowledge, Understanding. Mind the gap, Engineering Science and Education Journal, pp. 227-230, (1996); Yokomoto C.F., Bestwick W.D., Modeling the process of writing measurable outcomes, Proceedings Frontiers in Education Conference, (1999); Koen W., Discussion of the Method. Conducting the Engineer's approach to Problem Solving, (2003); IBM's New Motto: Think, About how others think, (2006); Time for Science Education. How teaching the History and Philosphy of Pendulum Motion Can Contribute to Science Literacy; Goldman S.L., Why we need a philosophy of engineering: A work in progress, Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 29, 2, pp. 163-176, (2004); Newman J.H., The Idea of a University, (1952); Heywood J., Think...About how others think, Liberal education and engineering, (2007); Brubacher J., On the Philosophy of Higher Education, (1977); Noddings N., Philosophy of Education, (1995); Wringe C., Understanding Educational Aims, (1988)