CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

Political education in/as the practice of freedom: A paradoxical defence from the perspective of Michael Oakeshott

Tác giả

Engel S.M.

Năm xuất bản

2007

Source title

Journal of Philosophy of Education

Số trích dẫn

8

DOI

10.1111/j.1467-9752.2007.00560.x

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-38649104818&doi=10.1111%2fj.1467-9752.2007.00560.x&partnerID=40&md5=851128f44ad9f4abad3acf63963ec427

Tóm tắt

Creating education systems that promote democratic sustainability has been the concern of political thinkers as diverse as J. S. Mill, Dewey, Benjamin Barber and Derek Bok. The classic dichotomisation of democratic theory between deliberative democrats and Schumpeterian democrats suggests that education in the service of democracy can be constructive - that is, provide a student with the skills necessary to elect her leaders without changing her nature - or reconstructive - that is, fundamentally and radically reshape the student to produce a citizen whose goals are transformed to be congruent with society. Michael Oakeshott, who has written extensively both on political regimes and on the purpose of liberal education, offers a third way to assess the connection between government and education. Despite his own dismissal of civic or political education as fundamentally vocational and thus beyond the boundaries of the liberal arts, this paper provides a potentially surprising Oakeshottian defence of political education within the liberal arts with reference to the importance he places on experience as a pedagogic tool. Thus, Oakeshott's educational philosophy has a certain resonance with the recent calls to locate the relevance of liberal arts within the burgeoning development of experiential civic engagement programmes in American universities. © 2007 Journal of the Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain.

Từ khóa

Tài liệu tham khảo

Berlin I., The Counter-Enlightenment, The Proper Study of Mankind: An Anthology of Essays, (2000); Berlin I., From Hope and Fear Set Free, The Proper Study of Mankind: An Anthology of Essays, (2000); Berlin I., Two Concepts of Liberty, The Proper Study of Mankind: An Anthology of Essays, (1997); Bok D., The Trouble with Government, (2002); Callan E., Beyond Sentimental Civic Education, American Journal of Education, 102, 2, pp. 190-221, (1994); Flathman R.E., Liberal Versus Civic, Republican, Democratic, and other Vocational Educations: Liberalism and Institutionalized Education, Political Theory, 24, 1, pp. 4-32, (1996); Fuller T., A Philosophical Understanding of Education, The Voice of Liberal Learning: Michael Oakeshott on Education, (1989); Fuller T., The Idea of the University in Newman, Oakeshott, and Strauss, Academic Questions, 17, 1, pp. 37-53, (2003); Galston W., Liberal Purposes: Goods, Virtues, and Diversity in the Liberal State, (1991); Hartz L., The Liberal Tradition in America, (1955); Horkheimer M., Adorno T., Dialectic of Enlightenment, From Modernism to Postmodernism: An Anthology, (1944); Lang E.M., Distinctively American: The American Liberal Arts College, Daedalus: Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 128, 1, (1999); McCabe D., Michael Oakeshott and the Idea of Liberal Education, Social Theory and Practice, 26, 3, (2000); Milbank D., (2002); Murphy J.B., (2002); Oakeshott M., The Idea of a University, The Voice of Liberal Learning: Michael Oakeshott on Education, (1950); Oakeshott M., The Universities, The Voice of Liberal Learning: Michael Oakeshott on Education, (1949); Oakeshott M., Learning and Teaching, The Voice of Liberal Learning: Michael Oakeshott on Education, (1965); Oakeshott M., Education: The Engagement and its Frustration, The Voice of Liberal Learning: Michael Oakeshott on Education, (1972); Oakeshott M., A Place for Learning, The Voice of Liberal Learning: Michael Oakeshott on Education, (1975); Oakeshott M., On Human Conduct, (1975); Oakeshott M., Rationalism in Politics, Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays, (1947); Oakeshott M., On Being Conservative, Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays, (1950); Oakeshott M., The Political Economy of Freedom, Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays, (1949); Oakeshott M., Rational Conduct, Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays, (1950); Oakeshott M., Political Education, Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays, (1962); Oakeshott M., The Study of Politics in a University, Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays, (1962); Parry G., Constructive and Reconstructive Political Education, Oxford Review of Education, 25, 12, pp. 23-38, (1999); Pateman C., Participation and Democratic Theory, The Democracy Sourcebook, (2003); Przeworski A., Minimalist Conception of Democracy: A Defense, The Democracy Sourcebook, (2003); Putnam R.D., Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, (2000); Rimer S., (2003); Sandel M., Democracy's Discontent: America in Search of A Public Philosophy, (1996); Sander T.H., Putnam R.D., (2002); Schumpeter J., Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, The Democracy Sourcebook, (2003); Skocpol T., Diminished Democracy: From Membership to Management in American Civic Life., (2003); Shapiro I., The State of Democratic Theory, (2003); Smith R., Beyond Tocqueville, Myrdal, and Hartz: The Multiple Traditions in America, American Political Science Review, 87, 3, pp. 549-566, (1993); Tocqueville A., De, Democracy in America, (1835); Williams K., The Gift of an Interval: Michael Oakeshott's Idea of a University Education, British Journal of Educational Studies, 37, 4, pp. 384-397, (1989)

Nơi xuất bản

Hình thức xuất bản

Article

Open Access

Nguồn

Scopus