Retooling Education: Testing and the Liberal Arts
Jackson R.L.
2007
Academic Questions
0
10.1007/s12129-007-9033-7
The motivation and methodology for measuring intelligence have changed repeatedly in the modern history of large-scale student testing. Test makers have always sought to identify raw aptitude for cultivation, but they have never figured out how to promote excellence while preserving equality. They've settled for egalitarianism, which gives rise to "culturally fair" tests that substitute vagaries for knowledge, deprive students of any real appreciation for language, and trivialize education. Robert Jackson yearns for traditional oratorical approaches to schooling that venerate and imitate essential, time-tested masters. Unfortunately, he writes, such an education defies measurement with today's multiple-choice instruments. © 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
Dumbing down; Education reform; Erasmus; g-Factor; IQ; Progressive; Psychometrics; SAT exams; Standardized tests; Teaching to the test
Ackerman M., Mental Testing and the Expansion of Educational Opportunity, History of Education Quarterly, 35, 3, pp. 279-300, (1995); Baldwin T.W., Shakespeare's Small Latine and Lesse Greeke, (1944); Chapman P.D., Schools as Sorters: Testing and Tracking in California, 1910-1925, Journal of Social History, 14, 4, (1981); (2005); Dewey J., The School and Society, (1900); Edwards N., Richey H.G., The School In the American Social Order, (1963); Howell W.G., West M.R., Peterson P.E., What Americans Think About Their Schools, Education Next, pp. 12-26, (2007); Jeffrey D.L., The Pear of Great Wisdom, Touchstone, pp. 25-30, (2007); Lemann N., The Great Sorting, The Atlantic Monthly 276.3, pp. 84-100, (1995); Mirel J., The Traditional High School, Education Next (Winter, pp. 14-21, (2006); Murray C., Abolish the SAT, The American, 32, 26, pp. 106-111, (2007); Petrilli M.J., National Testing: It's Time, (2007); Ravitch D., Left Back: A Century of Battles Over School Reform, (2000)
Article
Scopus