CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

The scholarship of teaching and learning: A special niche for faculty at comprehensive universities?

Tác giả

Henderson B.B.; Buchanan H.E.

Năm xuất bản

2007

Source title

Research in Higher Education

Số trích dẫn

32

DOI

10.1007/s11162-006-9035-2

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-34248210192&doi=10.1007%2fs11162-006-9035-2&partnerID=40&md5=c41418b0119176bf1401fa51e104d5a8

Tóm tắt

We investigated the involvement of faculty members at comprehensive universities in scholarship of teaching and learning publishing activities in four disciplines. Compared to to their publishing rates in research-oriented journals, comprehensive university faculty members were more involved in publishing articles and serving on editorial boards for pedagogical journals. Over the past three decades, the relative involvement in the scholarship of teaching and learning journals by faculty members at comprehensive universities and liberal arts colleges has increased whereas participation by faculty members at research universities has declined. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007.

Từ khóa

Carnegie Classification; Comprehensive universities; Ernest Boyer; Faculty evaluation; Pedagogical journals; Publication rates; Scholarship of teaching

Tài liệu tham khảo

Adams K.A., What Colleges and Universities Want in New Faculty, (2002); American Chemical Society publications: Chemical Reviews, (2006); American Chemical Society publications: Journal of the American Chemical Society, (2006); American Marketing Association publications: Journal of Marketing Research, (2006); American Psychological Association publications: Psychological Bulletin, (2006); Baldridge J.V., Curtis D., Ecker G., Riley G., Policy Making and Effective Leadership, (1978); Beins B., Teaching of Psychology, (1997); Bentley R., Blackburn R.T., Changes in academic research performance over time: A study of institutional accumulative advantage, Research in Higher Education, 31, 4, pp. 327-353, (1990); Bogue E.G., Aper J., Exploring the Heritage of American Higher Education: The Evolution of Philosophy and Policy, (2000); Bowen H.R., Schuster J.H., American Professors: A National Resource Imperiled, (1986); Boyer E.L., Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate, (1990); Braxton J.M., Del Favero M., Evaluating scholarship performance: Traditional and emergent assessment templates, Evaluating Faculty Performance. New Directions for Institutional Research, No. 114, pp. 19-31, (2002); Braxton J.M., Luckey W., Heiland P., Institutionalizing a Broader View of Scholarship through Boyer's Four Domains, ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 29, 2, (2002); Braxton J.M., Luckey W., Heiland P., Ideal and actual value patterns toward domains of scholarship in three types of colleges and universities, Analyzing Faculty Work and Rewards: Using Boyer's Four Domains of Scholarship. New Directions for Institutional Research, No. 129, pp. 67-76, (2006); A Classification of Institutions of Higher Education: A Report of the Carnegie Council on Policy Studies in Higher Education, (1976); Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education, (2000); Clark B., The Academic Life: Small Worlds, Different Worlds, (1987); Coser L., Greedy Institutions: Patterns of Undivided Commitment, (1974); Daly W.T., Teaching and scholarship: Adapting American higher education to hard times, Journal of Higher Education, 65, 1, pp. 45-57, (1994); Moyne College L., Teaching Sociology, (2006); Dey E.L., Milem J.F., Berger J.B., Changing patterns of publication productivity: Accumulative advantage or institutional isomorphism?, Sociology of Education, 70, 4, pp. 308-323, (1997); Journal of Chemical Education, (2006); Fairweather J.S., Faculty Work and Public Trust: Restoring the Value of Teaching and Public Service in American Academic Life, (1996); Finkestein M.J., The American Academic Profession: A Synthesis of Social Scientific Inquiry Since World War II, (1984); Glassick C.E., Huber M.T., Maeroff G.I., Scholarship Assessed: Evaluation of the Professoriate, (1997); Glover J.A., Scholarly publications: It's still publish or perish, The An and Politics of College Teaching: A Practical Guide for the Beginning Professor, pp. 217-225, (2001); Goodlad J.I., Connecting the present to the past, Places Where Teachers are Taught, pp. 3-39, (1990); Henderson B.B., Teaching at the People's, (2007); Henderson B.B., Kane W.D., Caught in the middle: Faculty and institutional status and quality in state comprehensive universities, Higher Education, 22, 4, pp. 339-350, (1991); Hutchings P., Shulman L.S., The scholarship of teaching: New elaborations, new developments, Change, 31, 5, pp. 10-15, (1999); Leatherman C., Definition of faculty scholarship must be expanded to include teaching, Carnegie Foundation says, Chronicle of Higher Education, A1, (1990); Lewis M., Poisoning the Ivy: The Seven Deadly Sins and Other Vices of Higher Education in America, (1997); Journal of Marketing Education Journal, (2006); O'Meara K.A., Encouraging multiple forms of scholarship in faculty reward systems: Does it make a difference?, Research in Higher Education, 46, 5, pp. 479-510, (2005); Faculty Priorities: Rewarding Multiple Forms of Scholarship, (2005); Perry R.P., Menec V.H., Struthers C.W., Hechter F.J., Schonwetter D.J., Menges R.J., Faculty in transition: A longitudinal analysis of the role of perceived control and type of institution in adjustment to postsecondary institutions, Research in Higher Education, 38, 5, pp. 519-556, (1997); Rice R.E., Scholarship reconsidered: History and context, Faculty Priorities Reconsidered: Rewarding Multiple Forms of Scholarship, pp. 17-31, (2005); Preparing faculty for the new conceptions of scholarship. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, No. 54, (1993); Richlin L., Scholarly teaching and the scholarship of teaching, Scholarship Revisited: Perspectives on the Scholarship of Teaching. New Directions in Teaching and Learning No. 86, pp. 57-68, (2001); Ruscio K.P., The distinctive scholarship of the selective liberal arts college, Journal of Higher Education, 58, 2, pp. 205-222, (1987); Russell S.H., Cox R.S., Williamson C., Boismier J., Javitz H., Fairweather J., Zimbler L.J., Faculty in Higher Education Institutions, 1988: 1988 National Survey of Postsecondary Faculty, (1990); Selingo J., Facing new missions and rivals, state colleges seek a makeover, Chronicle of Higher Education, (2000); Toutkoushian R.K., Porter S.R., Danielson C., Hollis P.R., Using publications counts to measure an institution's research productivity, Research in Higher Education, 44, 2, pp. 121-148, (2003); Van den Berghe P., Academic Gamesmanship: How to Make a Ph.D. Pay, (1970); Weston C., McAlpine L., Making explicit the development toward the scholarship of teaching, Scholarship Revisited: Perspectives on the Scholarship of Teaching New Directions for Teaching and Learning No. 86, pp. 89-97, (2001); Wright M.C., Assar N., Kain E.L., Kramer L., Howery C.B., McKinney K., Glass B., Atkinson M., Greedy institutions: The importance of institutional context for teaching in higher education, Teaching Sociology, 32, 2, pp. 144-159, (2004)

Nơi xuất bản

Hình thức xuất bản

Article

Open Access

Nguồn

Scopus