CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

Georg Kerschensteiner - Founding the dual system in Germany

Tác giả

Winch C.

Năm xuất bản

2006

Source title

Oxford Review of Education

Số trích dẫn

DOI

10.1080/03054980600776530

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-33745330400&doi=10.1080%2f03054980600776530&partnerID=40&md5=1cb87ba41c9e4a01fe14481d4962fbec

Tóm tắt

The contemporary relevance of the German philosopher of vocational education, Georg Kerschensteiner, is first indicated in general terms in relation to current debates and policies. Kerschensteiners main ideas are then outlined. There is a discussion of his relationship with progressivism, his ideas about learning and the importance of practical activity. His ideas about the nature of work and the relationship between work and paid unemployment are then considered. Kerschensteiner was particularly concerned with the role of work in promoting the development of character through the 'bourgeois virtues concerned with the work and the 'civic virtues concerned with the relationship between work and the broader society. His views on character formation are related to this discussion of civic education. Kerschensteiners innovations to schooling in Munich are then described in relation to his philosophical outlook and finally his views on the German tradition of liberal education or Bildung and how these relate to vocational education are outlined.

Từ khóa

Tài liệu tham khảo

Arendt, The Human Condition, (1958); Aristotle, Nichomachean Ethics, (1925); Beiser F., A romantic education: The concept of Bildung in early German romanticism, Philosophers on Education, pp. 284-299, (1998); Brown H., Green A., Lauder H., High Skills: Glabalisation, Competitiveness and Skill Formation, (2001); Virtue Theory and Moral Education, (1998); Vocational Education: International Perspectives and Developments, (2006); Darling J., Child Centred Education and Its Critics, (1994); Dewey J., Democracy and Education, (1916); The Economic Benefits of Education, (2003); Working Group on 14-19 Reform, (2004); Dunne J., Back to the Rough Ground, (1993); Goethe J., Wilhelm Meister's Lehrjahre, (1980); Gramsci A., Selections from the Prison Notebooks, (1971); Hanf G., Under American influence? - The making of modern German training in large Berlin enterprises at the beginning of the 20th century, Vocational Education: International Perspectives and Developments, (2006); Hodgson G., Economics and Utopia, (1998); Johnson S., Rasselas, Prince of Abyssinia, (1975); Keller G., Der Grüne Heinrich, (1951); Kerschensteiner G., Staatsbürgerliche Erziehung für der Deutschen Jugend in Ausgewählte Pädagogische Texte, 1-2, (1968); Produktiver Arbeit und ihr Erziehungswert in Ausgewählte Pädagogische Texte, 2, (1906); Die Schulwerkstatt als Grundlage der Fortbildungsschule, (1908); Sitten, Gebräuche, Kulte als Wertträger im Bildungsverfahren, pp. 63-69, (1925); Selbstdarstellung, (1926); Das Problem der Lebensnähe Unserer Schulen, (1930); Lewis T., School reform in America: Can Dewey's ideas save high school vocational education?, Vocational Education: International Perspectives and Developments, (2003); List F., The National System of Political Economy, (1991); Locke J., Essay on Human Understanding, (1961); Maclntyre A., After Virtue, (1981); Marx K., Capital, 1, (1887); Masschelein J., How to conceive of educational theory today?, Journal of Philosophy of Education, (2004); Mill J.S., The Principles of Political Economy, (1994); Pestalozzi J.H., How Gertrude Teaches Her Children, (1915); Prais S., Productivity, Education and Training: An International Perspective, (1995); Rousseau J.-J., Emile ou l'Education, (1968); Simons D., Georg Kerschensteiner, (1966); Streeck W., Social Institutions and Economic Performance, (1992); Smith A., The Wealth of Nations, (1981); Taylor F., The Principles of Scientific Management, (1911); Williams M., Wealth Without Nations, (2000); Critique and Conformity in Liberal Society, (2004); The Journal of Philosophy of Education, 38, 3