CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

Historical trends of articulation in america: A review of the literature

Tác giả

Mosholder R.S.; Zirkle C.J.

Năm xuất bản

2007

Source title

Community College Journal of Research and Practice

Số trích dẫn

DOI

10.1080/10668920701366875

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85011482250&doi=10.1080%2f10668920701366875&partnerID=40&md5=2241cbe52e5f58e5c88270892421a9b6

Tóm tắt

Articulation agreements have been part of the American educational scene for well over 100 years. Initially implemented as a tool for more effectively and efficiently delivering liberal educations, they became more common as the numbers of community colleges grew during the 1960s and 1970s. During the mid-1980s, the universal education promise of open enrollment was seen by many as a way of “dead-ending” minority students. This perception attracted much scholarly attention and foundation funding. It also resulted in many efforts to improve minority transfer, including negotiated articulation agreements. The past decade has seen higher education expenses increase more rapidly than other state expenses. Articulation agreements are attractive during such periods because of their cost savings potential. Scholars and administrators involved in developing these agreements can prepare themselves for discussions and negotiations by understanding some of the reasons why they have varied in popularity and utility. This literature review analyzed the sociocultural and historical contexts affecting articulation. It also sought answers to research questions addressing the chronological progression and prevalent trends in the development of the processes of articulation, the relationship these trends have to the historical and regional variations in support for articulation agreements, and the levels of student success in articulated programs of study. © 2007 Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.

Từ khóa

Tài liệu tham khảo

Anderson G.M., Alfonso A., Sun J., Rethinking cooling out at public community colleges: An examination of fiscal and demographic trends in higher education and the rise of statewide articulation agreements, The Teachers’ College Record, 108, 3, pp. 422-451, (2006); Barkley S.M., A synthesis of recent literature on articulation and transfer, Community College Review, 20, 4, pp. 39-50, (1993); Bird G.V., The Public Junior College, (1956); Bowles D., Transferability in the liberal arts and sciences, Enhancing Articulation and Transfer, pp. 27-38, (1988); Cohen A.M., Celebrating Transfer, (1993); Cohen A.M., Governmental policies affecting community colleges: A historical perspective, Community Colleges: Policy in the Future Context, pp. 3-22, (2001); Cohen A.M., The Community College and the Path to Baccalaureate, 476, (2003); Cohen A.M., Brawer F.B., Transfer Education in America, (1985); Cohen A.M., Brawer F.B., The Collegiate Function of Community Colleges, (1987); Cohen A.M., Brawer F.B., Policies and Programs that Affect Transfer, (1996); Cohen A.M., Brawer F.B., The American Community College, (2003); Cooper H., The Literature Review: Knowledge Synthesis Activities in Education and Psychology, (1985); Jalomo R., Institutional policies that promote persistence among first-year community college students, Community Colleges: Policy in the Future Context, pp. 261-281, (2001); Kintzer F.C., A historical and futuristic perspective of articulation and transfer in the United States, Transfer and Articulation: Improving Policies to Meet New Needs, pp. 3-13, (1996); Knoell D., Transfer, Articulation, and Collaboration: 25Years Later, (1990); Knoell D.M., Medsker L.L., Articulation between Two-Year and Four-Year Colleges, (1964); Koos L.V., The Junior College, (1924); Laanan F.S., Accountability in community colleges: Looking toward the 21st century, Statewide Transfer and Articulation Policies: Current Practices and Emerging Issues, pp. 57-76, (2001); Parnell D., The Neglected Majority, (1985); Pincus F.L., Vocational education: More false promises, The Community College and Its Critics, pp. 41-52, (1986); Prager C., Editor’s notes, Enhancing Articulation and Transfer, pp. 1-5, (1988); Prager C., The other transfer degree, Enhancing Articulation and Transfer, pp. 77-88, (1988); Richardson J., Richard C., De Los Santos G.E., Statewide governance structure and two-year colleges, Community Colleges: Policy in the Future Context, pp. 40-55, (2001); Robertson P.F., Frier T., The role of the state in transfer and articulation, Transfer and Articulation: Improving Policies to Meet New Needs, pp. 15-24, (1996); Robertson-Smith M., Articulation Models for Vocational Education. Columbus, OH, (1990); Thornton J.W., The Community Junior College, (1966); Zirkle C., Brenning J., Marr J., An Ohio model for articulated teacher education, Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 30, pp. 501-512, (2006); Zwerling L.S., First-generation adult students. In search of safe havens, First-Generation College Students: Confronting the Issues, pp. 45-54, (1992)