Voices of silence in pedagogy: Art, writing and self-encounter
Caranfa A.
2006
Journal of Philosophy of Education
16
10.1111/j.1467-9752.2006.00499.x
This article draws on the conclusion of the Commission on the Humanities in The Humanities in American Life that the aim of a liberal arts education is to foster critical reasoning through the use of language or discourse. This paper maintains that the critical method is in itself insufficient to achieve its purpose. Its failure is in its exclusion of feeling and of silence from the thinking process. Hence, the ultimate object of my analysis is to correct and to complement the critical method with the aesthetic method of teaching the humanities. Central to the aesthetic method is art as a means to cultivate contemplative and creative skills. The essay brings out and examines the value of art as voices of silence in Plato, Aristotle, Augustine, Dionysius, Bonaventure, Maurice Merleau-Ponty and Paul Gauguin, and pays particular attention to the diaries of Eugène Delacroix. In the course of doing so, I shall be trying to make clear that art teaches us how to listen and how to encounter ourselves totally and completely. It goes on to suggest several pedagogical principles or consequences that flow from this aesthetic pedagogy. © 2006 The Author.
Arendt H, The Human Condition, (1958); Aristotle, The Basic Works of Aristotle, (1941); Augustine, The Confessions, (1963); Baron J, Sternberg R., Teaching Thinking Skills: Theory and Practice, (1987); Bergson H, Creative Evolution, (1911); Bonaventure, Al E., The Soul's Journey into God, (1978); Brooks W V., Gauguin's Intimate Journals, (1968); Burbules N, Berk R., Critical Thinking and Critical Pedagogy, Critical Theories of Education: Changing Terrains of Knowledge and Politics, pp. 45-65, (1999); Buber M, I and Thou, (1971); Caranfa A, Claudel: Beauty and Grace, (1989); The Humanities in American Life, (1980); Comte A, Introduction to Positive Philosophy, (1988); De Bruyne E., The Esthetics of the Middle Ages, (1969); Dionysius, The Divine Names, (1978); Eaton M M., Aesthetics and the Good Life, (1989); Eco U, Art and Beauty in the Middle Ages, (1986); Gadamer -G H., Philosophical Hermeneutics, (1976); Hofstadter A, Truth and Art, (1965); Huizinga J, The Waning of the Middle Ages, (1954); Levinas E, Totality and Infinity, (1969); Leonard B G., Education and Ecstasy, (1968); Locke D, Science As Writing, (1992); Malraux A, The Voices of Silence, (1978); Marcel G, Creative Fidelity, (1964); McPeck J, Critical Thinking and Education, (1981); Merleau-Ponty M, Signs, (1964); Merleau-Ponty M, Cézanne's Doubt, The Merleau-Ponty Aesthetics Reader: Philosophy and Painting, (1993); Merleau-Ponty M, The Merleau-Ponty Aesthetics Reader: Philosophy and Painting, (1993); Merleau-Ponty M, The Prose of the World, (1973); Merleau-Ponty M, The Visible and the Invisible, (1968); Ouspensky L, Lossky V., The Meaning of Icons, (1989); Plato, The Dialogues of Plato, 1, (1937); Polanyi M, Meaning, (1975); Polanyi M, The Tacit Dimension, (1966); Polanyi M, Personal Knowledge, (1964); Richardson L, Writing, Handbook of Qualitative Research, (2000); Siegel H, Educating Reason: Rationality, Critical Thinking, and Education, (1988); Skinner F B., Beyond Freedom and Dignity, (1972); Skinner F B., Walden II, (1948); Thomson B, Gauguin by Himself, (1993); Thorndike E, The Principles of Teaching, (1906); Wellington H., The Journal of Eugène Delacroix, (1980)
Review
Scopus