An exploratory study of adoption of software and hardware by faculty in the liberal arts and sciences
Yohon T.; Zimmerman D.
2006
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
4
10.2190/8QGV-RYXQ-VY7Q-5RJT
Universities and colleges are investing millions of dollars in information technology infrastructure to support teaching, research, and service, and thousands of dollars annually in faculty training programs. And yet, many college graduates entering the workforce lack adequate technology skills. To ascertain the frequency of faculty adoption of information technology, we surveyed a random sample of faculty in the liberal arts and sciences departments in our university. Overall faculty members (n = 174) reported a low usage of information technology for teaching, though the rate of software adoption is higher than the rate of hardware adoption. While opportunities to learn technology are available, about two-thirds of the faculty members have not completed the available seminars and workshops on information technologies but prefer more informal ways of learning information technology, such as talking with other faculty members.
Green K.C., Follow the Money. Syllabus; National Norms--1998-1999 Higher Education Research Institute Faculty Survey Report, (1999); Lammers W.J., Murphy J.J., A Profile of Teaching Techniques Used in the University Classroom, Active Learning in Higher Education, 3, 1, pp. 54-67, (2003); Green K.C., Tracking the Digital Puck in 2004, Syllabus, 17, (2003); Taft D.K., Service as Science, eWeek, 21, (2004); Dillman D.A., Mail and Internet Surveys, (2000); Babbie E., The Practice of Social Research, (1998); Bourque L.B., Fielder F.P., How to Construct Self-Administered and Mail Surveys, in The Survey, (1995); Fink A., The Survey Kit, (1995); Frankfort-Nachmias C., Nachmias D., Research Methods in the Social Sciences, (1996); Salant P., Dillman D.A., How to Conduct Your Own Survey, (1994); Zimmerman D.E., Muraski M., The Elements of Information Gathering, (1995); Seminoff N.E., Wepner S.B., Are Technology-Based Projects Valued as Scholarship for Tenure and Promotion?, Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 11, 3, pp. 5-10, (1995); Meltzer J., Sherman T.M., Ten Commandments for Successful Technology Implementation and Staff Development, Bulletin, pp. 23-32, (1997); Solomon G., Solomon S., Technology and Professional Development--10 Tips to Make it Better, Learning and Leading with Technology, 23, 3, pp. 38-39, (1995); Cradler J., Freeman M., Cradler R., McNabb M., Research Implications for Preparing Teachers to Use Technology, Learning and Leading with Technology, 30, 1, pp. 50-54, (2002); Guskey T.R., Staff Development and the Process of Teacher Change, Educational Researcher, 5, pp. 5-12, (1986); Snyder T.D., Hoffman C.M., (2002); McCredie J., Does IT Matter to Higher Education?, Educause Review, 38, 6, pp. 14-22, (2003); Rogers E., Diffusion of Innovations, (2003); Ajzen I., Fishbein M., Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, (1980); Bandura A., Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control, (1997); Handbook of Communication Science, (1987); Seminoff N.E., Wepner S.B., What Should We Know About Technology-Based Projects for Tenure and Promotion, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 30, 1, pp. 67-82, (1997)
Article
Scopus