The action competence approach in environmental education: Reprinted from Environmental Education Research (1997) 3(2), pp. 163–178
Jensen B.B.; Schnack K.
2006
Environmental Education Research
135
10.1080/13504620600943053
In this article, the concept of action competence is presented and an attempt is made to locate it within the concept of general educational theory. The concept of action competence, it is argued, should occupy a central position in the theory of environmental education as many of the crucial educational problems concerning a political liberal education are united in this concept. The preoccupation with action competence as an educational concept is based on scepticism about the educational paradigm in environmental education which manifests itself partly in a marked tendency to individualisation and partly in a tendency to regard the educational task as a question of behaviour modification. At the same time, action competence should be seen as a necessary alternative to the traditional, science-oriented approach to environmental education. Examples from developmental work in Danish schools are used to clarify and demarcate the concept of ‘action’ from ‘activity’ and ‘behaviour change’. Different kinds of actions are discussed, environmental actions are identified and a distinction is drawn between ‘direct’ and ‘indirect’ environmental actions. Finally, four problem areas are identified which require future research. © 2006, Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
Breiting S., Janniche P.M., MUVIN-DK. Background information for schools in Denmark participating in ‘Nordic Environmental Education in 1994–96’, (1995); Breiting S., Nielsen K., Environmental education research in the Nordic countries, (1996); Christensen C.U., Schnack K., Miljø og Natur. Rapport om Udviklingsarbejderne inden for Området Naturorientering og Miljøundervisning (Environment and Nature. Evaluation Report about Experimental Teaching and Innovation Projects in the Danish Folkeskole), (1991); Dewey J., Experience and education, (1938); Hellesnes J., Socialisering og Teknokrati (Socialization and Technocracy), (1976); Hillcoat J., Forge K., Fien J., Baker E., ‘I think it’s really great that someone is listening to us …’: young people and the environment, Environmental Education Research, 1, pp. 159-171, (1995); Jacobsen B., Schnack K., Wahlgren B., Erfaring og Undervising (Experience and Education), (1980); Jensen B.B., Farming and Health in Environmental Education, Agriculture and the cultural landscape in environmental education, pp. 32-40, (1991); Jensen B.B., Health promoting schools in Denmark: an action competence approach to health education, The ecological public health: from vision to practice, pp. 132-141, (1994); Jensen B., Research in environmental and health education, (1995); Jensen B.B., Schnack K., Handlekompetence som Didaktisk Begreb (Action Competence as Curriculum Concept), 2, (1993); Jensen B.B., Schnack K., Action and action competence as key concepts in critical pedagogy, 12, (1994); Karlegard C., Toftenow H., Miljöhistoria (Environmental History), (1990); Mogensen F., Handlekompetence som Didaktisk Begreb i Miljøundervisningen (Action competence as a curriculum concept in environmental education), (1995); Nielsen B., Praksis og Kritik (Praxis and Critique), (1973); Nielsen T.I., Handlinger (Actions), (1978); Schnack K., Humanisme—livsanskuelse og menneskesyn (Humanism—philosophy of life and anthropology), P aedagogisk Teori og Praksis (Theory and Praxis in Pedagogy), (1977); Schnack K., Erfaringsp aedagogikkens Baggrund og Foruds aetninger (The Idea and Background of Experiential Education), P ædagogisk Orientering, 1-2, pp. 2-7, (1981); Schnack K., Motiver og behov (motives and needs), Psykologisk Opslagsbog (Critical Essays in Psychology), (1994); Schnack K., Why focus on conflicting interests in environmental education?, paper presented at the Northern Call for the Environment. International Conference on Environmental Education
Article
Scopus