CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

Gothic horror? A response to Margaret Thornton

Tác giả

Cownie F.; Bradney A.

Năm xuất bản

2005

Source title

Social and Legal Studies

Số trích dẫn

DOI

10.1177/0964663905051224

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-18844382431&doi=10.1177%2f0964663905051224&partnerID=40&md5=d7cca946e8421110edb847bd88186c76

Tóm tắt

[No abstract available]

Từ khóa

Corporatization; Liberal education; Power; Resistance; University legal education

Tài liệu tham khảo

(2004); Bell J., Benchmarking: A pedagogically valuable process?, Web Journal of Current Legal Issues, 6, (1999); Birks P., The academic and the practitioner, Legal Studies, 18, pp. 397-414, (1998); Bradney A., The quality of teaching quality assessment in english law schools, The Law Teacher, 30, pp. 150-167, (1996); Bradney A., Benchmarking: A pedagogically valuable process? An alternative view, Web Journal of Current Legal Issues, 6, (1999); Bradney A., The quality assurance agency and the politics of audit, Journal of Law and Society, 28, pp. 430-442, (2001); Bradney A., Conversations, Chances and Choices: The Liberal Law School in the Twenty-first Century, (2003); Bradney A., Cownie F., British university law schools in the twenty-first century, Law's Future(s); British Legal Developments in the 21st Century, pp. 1-17, (2000); Bridge J., The academic lawyer: Mere working mason or architect?, Law Quarterly Review, 91, pp. 488-501, (1975); Brownsword R., Where are all the laws schools going?, The Law Teacher, 30, pp. 1-27, (1996); Burrage M., Practitioners, professors and the state in France, the USA and England, Education for the Professions, Quis Custodient...?, pp. 26-39, (1984); Cheffins B., Using theory to study law: A company law perspective, Cambridge Law Journal, 58, pp. 197-221, (1999); Collier R., The changing university and the (legal) academic career - Rethinking the relationship between women, men and the "private life" of the law school, Legal Studies, 22, pp. 1-32, (2002); Cownie F., Legal Academics: Culture and Identities, (2004); Currie J., Thiele B., Harris P., Gendered Universities in Globalized Economies: Power, Careers, and Sacrifices, (2002); Duxbury N., Jurists and Judges: An Essay on Influence, (2001); Goodrich P., The critic's love of the law: Intimate observations of an insular jurisdiction, Law and Critique, 10, pp. 343-360, (1999); Halpern D., Entry into the Legal Professions: The LAW Student Cohort Study: Years 1 and 2, (1994); Harris P., Jones M., A survey of law schools in the United Kingdom, 1996, The Law Teacher, 31, pp. 38-126, (1997); Henkel M., Academic Identities and Policy Changes in Higher Education, (2000); Johnson B., Kavanagh P., Mattson K., Steal this University: The Rise of the Corporate University and the Academic Labor Movement, (2003); Kelsey J., Privatizing the universities, Journal of Law and Society, 25, pp. 51-70, (1998); Kennedy D., Academic Duty, (1997); Kogan M., Hanney S., Reforming Higher Education, (2000); Second Consultation on a New Training Framework for Solicitors, (2003); Ways to Qualify as a Solicitor, (2004); Leighton P., New wine in old bottles or new wine in new bottles?, Journal of Law and Society, 25, pp. 85-101, (1998); Malinowski B., Argonauts of the Western Pacific, (1924); McAuslan P., The coming crisis in legal education, Journal of Law and Society, 16, pp. 310-318, (1989); McDowell B., The audiences for legal scholarship, Journal of Legal Education, 40, pp. 261-277, (1990); Pitcher J., Purcell K., Diverse expectations and access to opportunities: Is there a graduate labour market?, Higher Education Quarterly, 52, pp. 179-203, (1998); Pratt J., Burgess T., Polytechnics: A Report, (1974); Law, (2000); (2001); Rhode D., The professional responsibilities of professors, Journal of Legal Education, 51, pp. 158-166, (2001); Sherr A., Legal education, legal competence and little bo peep, The Law Teacher, 32, pp. 37-63, (1998); Subotnik D., Lazar G., Deconstructing the rejection letter: A look at elitism in article selection, Journal of Legal Education, 49, pp. 601-613, (1999); Thomas P., Socio-legal Studies, (1997); Thomson A., Critical approaches to law: Who needs legal theory?, The Critical Lawyers' Handbook, pp. 2-10, (1992); Trow M., The public and private lives of higher education, Daedalus, 104, pp. 113-127, (1975); Vick D., Murray A., Little G., Campbell K., The perceptions of academic lawyers concerning the effects of the United Kingdom research assessment exercise, Journal of Law and Society, 25, pp. 536-561, (1998)