CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

A national study on midlevel leaders in higher education: The unsung professionals in the academy

Tác giả

Rosser V.J.

Năm xuất bản

2004

Source title

Higher Education

Số trích dẫn

50

DOI

10.1023/B:HIGH.0000035543.58672.52

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-4043163355&doi=10.1023%2fB%3aHIGH.0000035543.58672.52&partnerID=40&md5=4f4e323272d7911dcb9ee48e4fbcbb37

Tóm tắt

A national study was conducted to examine the quality of midlevel leaders' worklife, satisfaction, morale and their intentions to leave. The study included 4,000 midlevel leaders who were randomly selected from a total national population of 11,300 from both public and private institutions within five Carnegie classifications (e.g., Doctoral/research-extensives and intensives, Baccalaureate generals and Liberal arts) across the United States. Three separate mailings yielded 2,000 responses for a 50 percent return rate and 1966 useable surveys. Midlevel leaders are defined as academic or non-academic support personnel within the structure of higher education organizations (e.g., directors and coordinators of admissions, institutional research, registrars, computing and technology, human resources, alumni affairs, student affairs, placement and counseling services, financial aid, development and planned giving). This national study proposes: (1) to examine those demographic characteristics and worklife issues that may have an impact on the perceptions of midlevel leaders' morale, satisfaction and intent to leave; and (2) to demonstrate the role satisfaction and morale has on midlevel leaders' intentions to stay or leave their current position or career. The findings indicate that individual perceptions of midlevel leaders' professional and institutional worklife are powerful variables that have an impact on their satisfaction, morale, and turnover intentions.

Từ khóa

Tài liệu tham khảo

Amey M., Bridging the cap between expectations and reality, Administrative Careers and the Marketplace, 18, 4, (1990); Austin A.E., Work experience of university and college administrators, Administrative Update, 6, 1, pp. 1-4, (1984); Austin A.E., Factors Contributing to Job Satisfaction of University Mid-Level Administrators, (1985); Austin A.E., Gamson Z.F., Academic Workplace: New Demands, Heightened Tensions, (1983); Bany M.A., Johnson L.V., Educational Social Psychology, (1975); Baynes J., Morale: A Study of Men and Courage, (1967); Benge E., Hickey J., Morale and Motivation: How to Measure Morale and Increase Productivity, (1984); Bensimon E.M., Neumann A., Redesigning Collegiate Leadership: Teams and Teamwork in Higher Education, (1993); Bess J.E., Lodahl T.M., Career patterns and satisfaction in university middle management, Educational Record, 50, 4, pp. 220-229, (1969); Blum D.E., 24-Pct. turnover rate found for administrators: Some officials are surprised by survey results, Chronicle of Higher Education, A1, (1989); Bluedorn A.C., The theories of turnover: Causes, effects, and meaning, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 1, pp. 75-128, (1982); Bluedorn A.C., A unified model of turnover from organizations, Human Relations, 35, 2, pp. 135-153, (1982); Bruce W.L., Blackburn J.W., Balancing Job Satisfaction and Performance, (1992); Doherty J., Psychological morale: Its conceptualisation and measurement: The Doherty Inventory of Psychological Morale (DIPM), Educational Studies, 14, 1, pp. 65-74, (1988); Grassmuck K., Big increases in academic support staffs prompt growing concern on campuses, The Chronicle of Higher Education, 36, 28, (1990); Grassmuck K., Throughout the 80s, colleges hired more non-teaching staff than other employees, The Chronicle of Higher Education, 37, 48, (1991); Gruenberg M.M., Understanding Job Satisfaction, (1979); Henkin A.B., Persson D., Faculty as gatekeepers: Non-academic staff participation in university governance, Journal of Educational Administration, 30, 2, pp. 52-64, (1992); Johnsrad L.K., Maintaining Morale: a Guide to Assessing the Morale of Midlevel Administrators and Faculty, (1996); Johnsrud L.K., Edwards R.L.R., Mediating the intent to leave: The affective responses of midlevel administrators to their worklives, ASHE Annual Meeting Paper, (2001); Johnsrud L.K., Heck R.H., Rosser V.J., Morale matters: Midlevel administrators and their intent to leave, Journal of Higher Education, 71, 1, pp. 34-59, (2000); Johnsrud L.K., Rosser V.J., Predicting and reducing midlevel administrative staff turnover, CUPA Journal, 49, 1-2, pp. 1-8, (1999); Johnsrad L.K., Rosser V.J., College and university midlevel administrators: Explaining and improving their morale, The Review of Higher Education, 22, 2, pp. 121-141, (1999); Johnsrud L.K., Rosser V.J., Understanding the Work and Career Paths of Midlevel Administrators, 28, 3, (2000); Johnsrud L.K., Sagaria M.A., Heck R.H., University staffing decisions to hire or promote, International Journal of Educational Management, 6, 2, pp. 20-31, (1992); Kauffman J.F., Administration then and now, Administrative Careers and the Marketplace, 18, 4, (1990); Lee T.W., Mowday R.T., Voluntarily leaving an organization: An empirical investigation of steers and mowday's model of turnover, Academy of Management Journal, 30, 4, pp. 721-743, (1987); Madron T.W., Craig J.R., Mendel R.M., Departmental morale as a function of the perceived performance of department heads, Research in Higher Education, 5, pp. 83-94, (1976); Mobley W.H., Employee Turnover: Causes, Consequences, and Control, (1982); Montgomery D.C., Lewis G.L., Administrative staff: Salaries and issues, The NEA Almanac of Higher Education, pp. 109-125, (1995); Mooney C.J., Study examines turnover rates in 12 campus jobs, The Chronicle of Higher Education, 2, 10, (1993); Moore K.M., Leaders in Transition -A National Study of Higher Education Administrators, (1983); Moore K.M., Sagaria M.A., Differential job change and stability among academic administrators, Journal of Higher Education, 53, 5, pp. 501-513, (1982); Moore K.M., Twombly S.B., Administrative Careers and the Marketplace: Toward the Year 2000, 18, 4, (1990); Muthen L.K., Muthen B.O., Mplus: The Comprehensive Modeling Program for Applied Researchers User's Guide, Version 2.13, (2003); Characteristics of college and university staff, NEA Higher Education Research Center, 3, 4, pp. 1-4, (1997); Price J.L., The Study of Turnover, (1977); Raykov T., Marcoulides G.A., A First Course in Structural Equation Modeling, (2000); Rosin H., Korabik K., Organizational experiences and propensity to leave: A multivariate investigation of men and women managers, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 46, pp. 1-16, (1995); Rosser V.J., Midlevel administrators: What we know, Understanding the Work and Career Paths of Midlevel Administrators, 28, 3, pp. 5-13, (2000); Rosser V.J., Javinar J.M., Student Affairs Leaders Intentions to Leave: Examining the Quality of Their Worklife, (2003); Sagaria M.A., Johnsrud L.K., Administrative promotion: The structuring of opportunity within the university, Review of Higher Education, 15, 2, pp. 191-211, (1992); Scott R.A., Lords, Squires and Yeoman: Collegiate middle Managers and Their Organizations, (1978); Sherif M., Sherif C.W., An Outline of Social Psychology, (1956); Solomon L.C., Tierney M.L., Determinants of job satisfaction among college administrators, Journal of Higher Education, 48, 4, pp. 412-431, (1977); Steers R.M., Mowday R.T., Employee turnover and post-decision accommodation processes, Research in Organizational Behavior, 3, pp. 235-281, (1981); Twombly S.B., Career maps and institutional highways, Administrative Careers and the Marketplace, 18, 4, (1990); Volkwein J.F., Malik S.M., Napierski-Prancl M., Administrative satisfaction and the regulatory climate at public universities, Research in Higher Education, 39, 1, pp. 43-63, (1998); Volkwein L.F., Parmley K., Comparing administrative satisfaction in public and private universities, Research in Higher Education, 41, 1, pp. 95-116, (2000); Ward L., Role stress and propensity to leave among new student affairs professionals, NASPA Journal, 33, 1, pp. 35-45, (1995); Zeitz G., Structural and individual determinants of organizational morale and satisfaction, Social Forces, 61, pp. 1088-1108, (1983)

Nơi xuất bản

Kluwer Academic Publishers

Hình thức xuất bản

Article

Open Access

Nguồn

Scopus