The laptop alternative: Student reactions and strategic implications
Demb A.; Erickson D.; Hawkins-Wilding S.
2004
Computers and Education
54
10.1016/j.compedu.2003.08.008
Designing the technology infrastructure for a college or university is a strategic decision that affects the quality of the educational experience for both students and faculty, and influences an institution's image and its ability to attract students. This article reports the results of survey research which explored student reactions to a campus-wide laptop initiative at a small liberal arts institution. Student perceptions of the value of the laptop are examined in seven contexts: academic success, study habits, faculty utilization, the development of a learning community, personal use, future plans and cost. The results broaden our understanding of the relationship between technology and learning and will assist institutional decision-makers as they evaluate technology options. © 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Distributed learning environments; Human-computer interface; Improving classroom teaching; Post-secondary education; Teaching learning strategies
Bates A.W., Managing Technological Change, (2000); Brown R.C., List of Colleges & Universities with Laptop or Notebook Computer Initiatives, (2002); Carlson S., A small college's mixed results with technology, The Chronicle of Higher Education, MARCH, (2001); Daniel J.S., Mega-universities and Knowledge Media, (1996); Driver M., Exploring student perceptions of group interaction and class satisfaction in the web-enhanced classroom, The Internet and Higher Education, 5, pp. 35-45, (2002); Ehrmann S.C., Asking the right question: What does research tell us about technology and higher learning, Change, 27, 2 MARCH-APRIL, pp. 20-27, (1995); Friedman T., The Lexus and the Olive Tree, (1999); Fuller T., Houghton's laptop program, Annual Conference of National Association of Christian College Admissions Personnel, (2002); Holleque K., Technology and Education at Valley City State University, (2002); Landry S.G., Costs of ubiquitous computing: A case study at Seton Hall University, Dollars, Distanced and Online Education, (2000); Mooney K., Bergheim L., The Ten Demandments, (2002); Moore G.A., Crossing the Chasm, (1991); The Technology Challenge on Campus from the Perspectives of the Chief Academic Officers, (2002); Olsen F., Colleges differ on costs and benefits of 'ubiquitous computing, The Chronicle of Higher Education, JANUARY, (2001); Olsen F., Duke U. decides against requiring freshmen to own laptops, The Chronicle of Higher Education, JANUARY, (2002); Owen P.S., Leadership Change Related to Technology Use for Student Learning at an Urban Community College, (2001); HyperRESEARCH: A Content Analysis Tool for the Qualitative Researcher Randolph, (1998); Scott H., Chenette J., Swartz J., The integration of technology into learning and teaching in the liberal arts, Liberal Education, SPRING, pp. 30-35, (2002); SPSS for Windows Release 11.0.1, (1989); Twigg C.A., Institutional readiness criteria, EDUCAUSE Review, MARCH-APRIL, pp. 42-51, (2000); Young J.R., Invasion of the laptops: More colleges adopt mandatory computing programs, The Chronicle of Higher Education, (1997)
Article
Scopus