Comparing representations and reasoning in children and adolescents with two-year college students
Glass B.
2004
Journal of Mathematical Behavior
4
10.1016/j.jmathb.2004.09.004
Problem solving and justification of a diversified group of two-year college students was compared with approaches of younger elementary and secondary school students working on the same tasks. The students in this study were engaged in thoughtful mathematics. Both groups found patterns, justified that their patterns were reasonable and, utilized similar strategies for their solutions and methods of justification. They were also able to make connections and build isomorphisms among the various problems. © Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Justification; Liberal arts mathematics; Problem solving; Reasoning
Alston A., Maher C.A., Tracing Milin's building of proof by mathematical induction: A case study, Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting for the North American Chapter for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2, pp. 1-7, (1993); Davis R.B., Learning mathematics: The cognitive science approach to mathematics education, (1984); Davis R.B., Understanding understanding, Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 11, pp. 225-241, (1992); Glass B.H., Problem solving and justification with community college students, (2001); Hiebert J., Carpenter T.P., Learning and teaching with understanding, Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, pp. 6-97, (1992); Kiczek R.D., Tracing the development of probabilistic thinking: Profiles from a longitudinal study, (2000); Kiczek R.D., Maher C.A., Tracing the origins and extensions of mathematical ideas, Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2, pp. 377-382, (1998); Maher C.A., Constructivism and constructivist teaching - Can they coexist?, Mathematics Teaching from a Constructivist Point of View, 3, pp. 29-42, (1998); Maher C.A., How students structure their own investigations and educate us: What we've learned from a fourteen year study, Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, pp. 31-46, (2002); Maher C.A., Davis R.B., Alston A., Implementing a thinking curriculum in mathematics, Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 10, pp. 219-224, (1991); Maher C.A., Martino A.M., The development of the idea of proof: A five-year case study, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 2, pp. 194-219, (1996); Maher C.A., Martino A.M., Brandon's proof and isomorphism, Can Teachers Help Students Make Convincing Arguments?, pp. 77-101, (1998); Maher C.A., Martino A.M., Teacher questioning to promote justification and generalization in mathematics: What research practice has taught us, Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18, pp. 53-78, (1999); Maher C.A., Martino A.M., From patterns to theories: Conditions for conceptual change, Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 19, pp. 247-271, (2000); Maher C.A., Speiser R., How far can you go with block towers?, Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 16, pp. 125-132, (1997); Martino A., Elementary students' construction of mathematical knowledge: Analysis by profile, (1992); McGowan M.A., Cognitive units, concept images, and cognitive collages: An examination of the process of knowledge construction, (1998); Muter E.M., The development of student ideas in combination and proof: A six year study, (1999); Muter E.M., Maher C.A., Recognizing isomorphism and building proof: Revisiting earlier ideas, Proceedings of the 20th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2, pp. 461-467, (1998); Pirie S., Kieren T., Creating constructivist environments and constructing creative mathematics, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23, pp. 505-528, (1992); Romberg T.A., Carpenter T.P., Research on teaching and learning mathematics: Two disciplines of scientific inquiry, Handbook of Research on Teaching, pp. 850-873, (1986); Sanchez E., Sacristan A.S., Influential aspects of dynamic geometry activities in the construction of proofs, Proceedings the Twenty-seventh Annual Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education and the Twenty-fifth Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 4, pp. 119-126, (2003); Schoenfeld A.H., What's all the fuss about metacognition, Cognitive Science and Mathematics Education, pp. 189-215, (1987); Schoenfeld A.H., Exploration of students' mathematical beliefs and behavior, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20, pp. 338-351, (1989); Wier D., The application of professional development in combinatorics and proof to classroom teaching, (1999)
Article
Scopus