Does teacher preparation matter? Evidence about teacher certification, teach for America, and teacher effectiveness
Darling-Hammond L.; Holtzman D.J.; Gatlin S.J.; Heilig J.V.
2005
Education Policy Analysis Archives
380
10.14507/epaa.v13n42.2005
Recent debates about the utility of teacher education have raised questions about whether certified teachers are, in general, more effective than those who have not met the testing and training requirements for certification, and whether some candidates with strong liberal arts backgrounds might be at least as effective as teacher education graduates. This study examines these questions with a large student-level data set from Houston, Texas that links student characteristics and achievement with data about their teachers' certification status, experience, and degree levels from 1995-2002. The data set also allows an examination of whether Teach for America (TFA) candidates - recruits from selective universities who receive a few weeks of training before they begin teaching - are as effective as similarly experienced certified teachers. In a series of regression analyses looking at 4th and 5th grade student achievement gains on six different reading and mathematics tests over a six-year period, we find that certified teachers consistently produce stronger student achievement gains than do uncertified teachers. These findings hold for TFA recruits as well as others. Controlling for teacher experience, degrees, and student characteristics, uncertified TFA recruits are less effective than certified teachers, and perform about as well as other uncertified teachers. TFA recruits who become certified after 2 or 3 years do about as well as other certified teachers in supporting student achievement gains; however, nearly all of them leave within three years. Teachers' effectiveness appears strongly related to the preparation they have received for teaching.
Teacher certification; Teacher education; Teacher effectiveness
Ballou D., Podgursky M., Reforming teacher preparation and licensing: What is the evidence?, Teachers College Record, 102, 1, pp. 1-27, (2000); Benner A.D., The Costof Teacher Turnover, (2000); Betts J.R., Rueben K.S., Danenberg A., Equal Resources, Equal Outcomes? The Distribution of School Resources and Student Achievement in California, (2000); Darling-Hammond L., Reforming teacher preparation and licensing: Debating the evidence, Teachers College Record, 102, 1, pp. 28-56, (2000); Darling-Hammond L., Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence, Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 8, 1, (2000); Darling-Hammond L., Chung R., Frelow F., Variation in teacher preparation: How well do different pathways prepare teachers to teach?, Journal of Teacher Education, 53, 4, pp. 286-302, (2002); Darling-Hammond L., MacDonald M., Where there is learning there is hope: The preparation of teachers at the Bank Street College of Education, Studies of Excellence in Teacher Education: Preparation at the Graduate Level, pp. 1-95, (2000); Darling-Hammond L., Sykes G., Wanted: A national teacher supply policy for education: The right way to meet the 'highly qualified teacher' challenge, Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 11, 33, (2003); Darling-Hammond L., Youngs P., Defining "highly qualified teachers:" What does "scientifically-based research" actually tell us?, Educational Researcher, 31, 9, pp. 13-25, (2002); Decker P.T., Mayer D.P., Glazerman S., The Effects of Teach for America on Students: Findings from a National Evaluation, (2004); Ferguson R.F., Paying for public education: New evidence on how and why money matters, Harvard Journal on Legislation, 28, 2, pp. 465-498, (1991); Fetler M., High school staff characteristics and mathematics test results, Education Policy Analysis Archives, 7, 9, (1999); Finn C.E., Foreword, Better Teachers, Better Schools, (1999); Fox J., Applied Regression Analysis, Linear Models, and Related Methods, (1997); Goe L., Legislating equity: The distribution of emergency permit teachers in California, Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 10, 42, (2002); Goldhaber D.D., Brewer D.J., Does teacher certification matter? High school teacher certification status and student achievement, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22, 2, pp. 129-146, (2000); Gomez D.L., Grobe R.P., Three Years of Alternative Certification in Dallas: Where Are We?, (1990); Hanushek E., Kain J., Rivkin S., Teachers, Schools, and Academic Achievement, (1998); Hawk P.P., Coble C.R., Swanson M., Certification: It does matter, Journal of Teacher Education, 36, 3, pp. 13-15, (1985); Henke R.R., Chen X., Geis S., Knepper P., Progress Through the Teacher Pipeline: 1992-93 College Graduates and Elementary/secondary School Teaching as of 1997, (2000); Prepared to Make a Difference: Research Evidence on How Some of America's Best College Programs Prepare Teachers of Reading, (2003); Klein S.P., Hamilton L.S., McCaffrey D.F., Stetcher B.M., What Do Test Scores in Texas Tell Us?, (2000); Koppich J., Trinity University: Preparing teachers for tomorrow's schools, Studies of Excellence in Teacher Education: Preparation in a Five-year Program, pp. 1-48, (2000); Laczko-Kerr I., Berliner D., The effectiveness of Teach for America and other under-certified teachers on student academic achievement: A case of harmful public policy, Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 10, 37, (2002); Monk D.H., Subject area preparation of secondary mathematics and science teachers and student achievement, Economics of Education Review, 13, 2, pp. 125-145, (1994); Murnane R., Singer J., Willett J., Kemple J., Olsen R., Who Will Teach? Policies That Matter, (1991); What Matters Most: Teaching for America's Future, (1996); No Dream Denied, (2003); Teaching Children to Read: An Evidence-based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and Its Implications for Reading Instruction, (2000); Raudenbush S.W., Bryk A.S., Ed.), (2002); Raymond M., Fletcher S.H., The Teach for America evaluation, Education next, 2, 1, pp. 62-68, (2002); Raymond M., Fletcher S.H., Luque J., Teach for America: An Evaluation of Teacher Differences and Student Outcomes in Houston, Texas, (2001); Shields P.M., Esch C.E., Humphrey D.C., Wechsler M.E., Chang-Ross C.M., Gallagher H.A., Guha R., Tiffany-Morales J.D., Woodworth K.R., The Status of the Teaching Profession 2003, (2003); Snyder J., Knowing children-understanding teaching: The developmental teacher education program at the University of California, Berkeley, Studies of Excellence in Teacher Education: Preparation at the Graduate Level, pp. 97-172, (2000); Strauss R.P., Sawyer E.A., Some new evidence on teacher and student competencies, Economics of Education Review, 5, 1, pp. 41-48, (1986); The Secretary's Report on Teacher Quality, (2002); Wenglinsky H., How Teaching Matters: Bringing the Classroom Back into Discussions of Teacher Quality, (2000); Wilson S.M., Floden R., Ferrini-Mundy J., Teacher Preparation Research: Current Knowledge, Gaps, and Recommendations, (2001); Zeichner K.M., Ability-based teacher education: Elementary teacher education at Alverno College, Studies of Excellence in Teacher Education: Preparation in the Undergraduate Years, pp. 1-66, (2000)
Arizona State University
Article
All Open Access; Gold Open Access; Green Open Access
Scopus