Deliberative Civic Education and Civil Society: A Consideration of Ideals and Actualities in Democracy and Communication Education
Murphy T.A.
2004
Communication Education
24
10.1080/0363452032000135788
Deliberative civic education is broadly conceived as instruction that utilizes varying forms of classroom deliberation and deliberative exercises to enhance the democratic skills of citizenship and to increase understanding of democratic practice. The purpose of this essay is to explore how the contemporary, critical elements of rhetorical study might be applied to the promise of deliberative civic education in college classrooms. I argue for the importance of incorporating critical dimensions of deliberative civic education into the liberal arts curriculum by explicating the tensions that exist between ideal, structured forms of deliberation and the actual practices of democracy. The notion of civil society, understood as both a site of rhetorical activity and a mediator of public life and public issues, affords students an especially productive inquiry into these tensions.
Civic education; Civil society; Deliberation; Rhetoric
Bachen C.S., Integrating communication theory and practice in community settings: Approaches, opportunities, and ongoing challenges, Voices of Trong Democracy: Concepts and Models for Service-learning in Communication Studies, pp. 13-23, (1999); Barber B.R., Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age, (1984); Barber B.R., Searching for civil society, National Civic Review, 84, pp. 114-119, (1995); Barber B.R., A Place for Us: How to Make Society Civil and Democracy Strong, (1998); Beem C., The Necessity of Politics: Reclaiming American Public Life, (1999); Berger P.L., Neuhaus J., To Empower People: From State to Civil Society, (1996); Carey J.W., Communication as Culture: Essays on Media and Society, (1992); (2003); Cohen J., The significance of critical communication skills, The Public Voice in a Democracy at Risk, pp. 41-56, (1998); Craig R.T., Communication as a practical discipline, Rethinking Communication: Volume 1 Paradigm Issues, pp. 97-122, (1989); De Santa Ana J., The concept of civil society, The Ecumenical Review, 46, pp. 3-11, (1994); Dewey J., Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education, (1916); Dewey J., The Public and Its Problems, (1927); Dionne E.J., Community Works: The Revival of Civil Society in America, (1998); Droge D., Murphy B.O., Voices of Strong Democracy: Concepts and Models for Service-learning in Communication Studies, (1999); Fishkin J.S., The Voice of the People, (1995); Foucault M., Power/knowledge, (1980); Gastil J., Dillard J.P., The aims, methods, and effects of deliberative civic education through the national issues forums, Communication Education, 48, pp. 179-192, (1999); Giroux H.A., Schooling and the Struggle for Public Life: Critical Pedagogy in the Modern Age, (1998); Goodnight G.T., Hingstman D.B., Studies in the public sphere, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 83, pp. 351-370, (1997); Gramsci A., Selections from the Prison Notebooks, (1971); Gravel A., Power and change in the 21st century: An exploration of the Industrial Areas Foundation as a model of theory and pedagogy in the persuasion course, Communication Education, 50, pp. 177-186, (2001); Hauser G.A., Vernacular Voices: The Rhetoric of Publics and Public Spheres, (1999); Hirokawa R.Y., Poole M.S., Communication and Group Decision-making, (1986); Ivie R.L., Democratic deliberation in a rhetorical republic, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 84, pp. 491-505, (1998); Lippmann W., Public Opinion, (1922); Lippmann W., The Phantom Public, (1925); Lisman C.D., Toward a Civil Society: Civic Literacy and Service Learning, (1998); Mallin I., Anderson K.V., Inviting constructive argument, Argumentation and Advocacy, 36, pp. 120-133, (2000); McMillan J.J., Harriger J., College students and deliberation: A benchmark study, Communication Education, 51, pp. 237-253, (2002); Mitchell G.R., Pedagogical possibilities for argumentative agency in academic debate, Argumentation and Advocacy, 35, pp. 41-61, (1998); Morreale S.P., Backlund P.M., Communication curricula: History, recommendations, resources, Communication Education, 51, pp. 2-18, (2002); Morris A.D., The Origins of the Civil Rights Movement: Black Communities Organizing for Change, (1984); National Issues Forums: A Different Kind of Talk, Another Way to Act, (2003); O'Connell B., Civil Society: The Underpinnings of American Democracy, (1999); Osborn M., Osborn S., Alliance for a Better Public Voice, (1991); Pearce W.B., On putting social justice in the discipline of communication and putting enriched concepts of communication in social justice research and practice, Journal of Applied Communication Research, 26, pp. 272-278, (1998); Pollitt K., For whom the ball rolls, The Nation, 262, (1996); Puckett J.L., Foxfire Reconsidered: A Twenty-year Experiment in Education, (1989); Putnam R.O., Bowling alone: America's declining social capital, Journal of Democracy, 6, 1, pp. 65-78, (1995); Putnam R.O., Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Democracy, (2000); Sandel M.J., Democracy's Discontent: America in Search of a Public Philosophy, (1996); Shor I., Critical Teaching and Everyday Life, (1987); Skocpol T., Fiorina M.P., Civic Engagement in American Democracy, (1999); Spano S., Public Dialogue and Participatory Democracy: The Cupertino Community Project, (2001); (2003); Swartz O., Interdisciplinary and pedagogical implications of rhetorical theory, Communication Studies, 46, pp. 130-139, (1995); Taylor C., Liberal politics and the public sphere, New Communitarian Thinking, pp. 183-217, (1995); Wallerstein N., Problem-posing education: Freire's method for transformation, Friere for the Classroom: A Sourcebook for Liberatory Teaching, pp. 33-44, (1987); Yankelovich D., Coming to Public Judgment: Making Democracy in a Complex World, (1991)
Routledge
Review
Scopus