CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

Implications of Academic Dishonesty for Teaching in Psychology

Tác giả

Jordan A.E.

Năm xuất bản

2003

Source title

Teaching of Psychology

Số trích dẫn

DOI

10.1207/S15328023TOP3003_03

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0141461663&doi=10.1207%2fS15328023TOP3003_03&partnerID=40&md5=2669e124e14c7828210f3e25698e6408

Tóm tắt

Academic dishonesty among students reveals potential problems in the teaching of psychology. In particular, a teaching pedagogy that emphasizes information delivery, and uses examinations as a method to discriminate among students aspiring for social and financial status, contributes to an academic climate of dishonesty. As a constructive response, I recommend that psychology faculty discuss with students (and with each other) certain fundamental assumptions of liberal education and consider how these assumptions relate to the discipline of psychology. © 2003, Society for the Teaching of Psychology. All rights reserved.

Từ khóa

Tài liệu tham khảo

Altman I., Higher education and psychology in the millennium, American Psychologist, 51, pp. 371-378, (1996); Anderman E.M., Griesinger T., Westerfield G., Motivation and cheating during early adolescence, Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, pp. 84-93, (1998); Bloom A., Interpretive essay, The republic of Plato, pp. 307-436, (1968); Cizek G.J., Cheating on tests: How to do it, detect it, and prevent it, (1999); Halpern D.F., Smothergill D.W., Allen M., Baker S., Baum C., Best D., Ferrari J., Geisinger K.F., Gilden E.R., Hester M., Keith-Spiegel P., Kierniesky N.C., McGovern T.V., McKeachie W.J., Prokasy W.F., Szuchman L.T., Vasta R., Weaver K.A., Scholarship in psychology: A paradigm for the twenty-first century, American Psychologist, 53, pp. 1292-1297, (1998); Hersh R.H., Intentions and perceptions: A national survey of public attitudes toward liberal arts education, Change, 29, pp. 16-23, (1997); Hollinger R.C., Lanza-Kaduce L., Academic dishonesty and the perceived effectiveness of countermeasures: An empirical survey of cheating at a major public university, NASPA Journal, 33, pp. 292-306, (1996); Jordan A.E., College student cheating: The role of motivation, perceived norms, attitudes, and knowledge of institutional policy, Ethics and Behavior, 11, pp. 233-247, (2001); Judges A.V., The evolution of examinations, Examinations, pp. 18-31, (1969); Kasser T., The high price of materialism, (2002); Kimball B.A., Orators & philosophers: A history of the idea of liberal education, (1986); Kimball B.A., Naming pragmatic liberal education, Education and democracy: Re-imagining liberal learning in America, pp. 45-67, (1997); McCabe D.L., Trevino L., Academic dishonesty: Honor codes and other contextual influences, Journal of Higher Education, 64, pp. 522-538, (1993); McCabe D.L., Trevino L.K., Butterfield K.D., Academic integrity in honor code and non-honor code environments: A qualitative investigation, Journal of Higher Education, 70, pp. 211-234, (1999); McCall R.B., The concept and practice of education, research, and public service in university psychology departments, American Psychologist, 51, pp. 379-388, (1996); Miyazaki I., China's examination hell: The civil service examinations of imperial China, (1976); Myers D.G., Waller J.E., Reflections on scholarship from the liberal arts academy, American Psychologist, 54, pp. 358-361, (1999); Newstead S.E., Franklyn-Stokes A., Armstead P., Individual differences in student cheating, Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, pp. 229-241, (1996); Oakley F., Community of learning: The American college and the liberal arts tradition, (1992); Education and democracy: Re-imagining liberal learning in America, (1997); Pavela G., McCabe D., The surprising return of honor codes, Planning for Higher Education, 21, pp. 27-32, (1993); Perlman B., McCann L.I., The most frequently listed courses in the undergraduate psychology curriculum, Teaching of Psychology, 26, pp. 177-182, (1999); Roig M., Can undergraduate students determine whether text has been plagiarized?, Psychological Record, 47, pp. 113-122, (1997); Rudolph F., Thelin J.R., The American college and university: A history, (1990); Sax L.J., Astin A.W., Korn W.S., Mahoney K.M., The American freshman: National norms for fall 2000, (2000); Schemo D.J., U. of Virginia hit by scandal over cheating, New York Times, (2001); Whitley B.E., Factors associated with cheating among college students: A review, Research in Higher Education, 39, pp. 235-274, (1998)