Writing and physics: An interdisciplinary approach
Joyner P.K.; Larkin T.L.
2002
Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference
1
During the Fall 2000 and Fall 2001 semesters, a joint study was undertaken between the Physics and Literature Departments at American University. The study involved the linking of two introductory general education Liberal Arts courses: an introductory physics class for non-majors and an introductory college writing class. One goal of the study was to provide more content-specific writing assignments within the college writing class by linking them to material being covered in the physics class. The writing assignments given in both classes formed the basis of the data collected during the study. Additional data was taken in Fall 2001 using the Force Concept Inventory (FCI), a nationally recognized assessment instrument to measure students' understanding of concepts in basic mechanics. The underlying questions behind the study involved the assessment of student learning in physics as well as in college writing. The primary research questions were: (1) Could this course linkage serve to enhance the motivation of Liberal Arts students to think more deeply and critically about the physics-specific content they were writing about in each class? (2) If so, could this enhanced motivation be linked to increased student understanding? Within this paper, highlights of the curricula developed for the linked classes will be provided along with results of the assessment of student learning.
Assessment; Curricular innovations; General education; Writing
Jones T.H., Paolucci R., The learning effectiveness of educational technology: A call for further research, Educational Technology Review, 9, pp. 10-14, (1998); Cobern W.W., World view theory and science education research, National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Monograph, 3, (1991); Arons A.B., A Guide to Introductory Physics Teaching., (1990); Halloun I.A., Hestenes D., The initial knowledge state of college students, American Journal of Physics, 53, 11, pp. 1043-1055, (1985); McCloskey M., Caramazza A., Green B., Curvilinear motion in the absence of external forces: Naïve beliefs about the motion of objects, Science, 210, pp. 1139-1141, (1980); McDermott L.C., Research on conceptual understanding in mechanics, Physics Today, 37, pp. 24-32, (1984); McDermott L.C., A view from physics, Toward a Scientific Practice of Science Education, pp. 3-30, (1991); Connolly P., Vilardi T., Writing to Learn in Mathematics and Science., (1989); Countryman J., Writing to Learn Mathematics: Strategies That Work., (1992); Hein T.L., Using student writing as a research and learning tool, AAPT Announcer, 27, 4, (1998); Hein T.L., Writing: An effective learning tool for non-science majors, AAPT Announcer, 29, 2, (1999); Kirkland W.L., Teaching biology through creative writing, Journal of College Science Teaching, 26, 4, pp. 277-279, (1997); Mullin W.J., Writing in physics, The Physics Teacher, 27, 5, pp. 342-347, (1989); Rice R.E., Scientific writing' - A course to improve the writing of science students, Journal of College Science Teaching, 27, 4, pp. 267-272, (1998); Sharp J.E., Olds B.M., Miller R.L., Dyrud M., Four effective writing strategies for engineering classes, Journal of Engineering Education, 88, 1, pp. 53-57, (1999); Tobias S., They're Not Dumb, They're Different: Stalking the Second Tier., (1990); Tobias S., Writing to Learn Mathematics and Science, (1989); Hein T.L., Learning style analysis in a calculus-based introductory physics course, Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), Anaheim, CA, (1995); Larkin-Hein T., Zollman D.A., Digital video, learning styles, and student understanding of kinematics graphs, Journal of SMET Education: Innovations and Research, 2, 2-3, pp. 17-30, (2000); Hein T.L., Budny D.D., Teaching with STYLE: Strategies that work, Electronic Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), Charlotte, NC, (1999); Larkin-Hein T., Budny D.D., Research on learning style: Applications in science and engineering, IEEE Transactions on Education Journal, 44, 3, pp. 276-281, (2001); Hein T.L., Budny D.D., Teaching to students' learning styles: Approaches that work, Electronic Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education (FIE) Conference, San Juan, Puerto Rico., (1999); Larkin-Hein T., Learning styles in introductory physics: Enhancing student motivation, interest, and learning, Electronic Proceedings of the "Cooperative Network for Engineering and Computer Education Development," International Conference on Engineering and Computer Education (ICECE), Sáo Paulo, Brazil., (2000); Hein T.L., Using writing to confront student misconceptions in physics, European Journal of Physics, 20, pp. 137-141, (1999); Larkin-Hein T., Joyner P.K., Linking physics with college writing, AAPT Announcer, 30, 4, (2001); Brown S., Knight P., Assessing Learners in Higher Education., (1994); Gastel B., Teaching Science: A Guide for College and Professional School Instructors., (1991); Harmelink K., Learning the write way, Science Teacher, 65, pp. 36-38, (1998); Wiggins G., Feedback: How learning occurs, AAHE Bulletin, 50, 3, pp. 7-8, (1997); Hollander S., Feedback on the rewriting process, The Teaching Professor, 14, 8, (2000); Guillen M., Five Equations That Changed the World., (1995); Frayn D., Copenhagen., (1998); Lightman A., Einstein's Dreams., (1993); Calvino I., Cosmicomics., (1968); Hestenes D., Wells M., Swackhamer G., Force concept inventory, The Physics Teacher, 30, 3, pp. 141-153, (1992); Rebello N.S., The effect of distractors on student performance on the force concept inventory, AAPT Announcer, 30, 4, (2001); Hake R.R., A six thousand student study of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses, The American Journal of Physics, 66, 1, pp. 64-74, (1998)
Conference paper
Scopus