The prediction of perceived level of computer knowledge: The role of participant characteristics and aversion toward computers
Compton D.M.; Burkett W.H.; Burkett G.G.
2002
Informing Science
4
10.28945/550
As we move into a new century, the ability to predict the impact of computer attitudes on computer knowledge is still a key component to the understanding of information sciences. Survey data about computer knowledge, interest, and level of interest were collected from 478 students at three types of colleges - a four-year liberal arts college, a business college, and a community college. The participants included individuals who fell within three self-rated computer knowledge categories, novice (n = 46), average (n = 286), or expert (n = 146), Stepwise discriminant function analysis was used to find the best subset of surveyed characteristics with which to discriminate among respondents with novice, average, or expert levels of computer knowledge. Two composite measures extracted from a previous analysis, reinforcement expectations for computers, and efficacy expectations for computers, and the statement, "I know how to use computer programs," were significant predictors of computer competency. Conversely, traditionally examined demographic variables such as gender and age were not significant predictors. Implications for the present findings are discussed.
Computer anxiety; Computer attitude; Computer aversion; Discriminant function analysis
Anderson A.A., Predictors of computer anxiety and performance in information systems, Computers and Human Behavior, 12, pp. 61-77, (1996); Anderson R.H., Bikson T.K., Law S.A., Mitchell B.M., Universal Access to E-mail: Feasibility and Societal Implications, (1995); Burkett W.H., A Study of Computer Aversion Factors and Their Effect on An Older Adult Population's Computer Anxiety, (1993); Burkett W.H., Compton D.M., Burkett G.G., An examination of computer attitudes, anxieties, and aversions among diverse college populations in the new millennium, Informing Science Journal, 4, pp. 77-85, (2001); Compton D., Burkett W.H., Burkett G.G., Factor Structure of the Adapted Computer Aversion Survey (CAV) of Meier, 1990, (2001); Crask M.R., Perreault Jr. W.D., Validation of discriminant analysis in marketing research, Journal of Marketing Research, 14, pp. 60-68; Dalgleish L.I., Discriminant analysis: Statistical inferences using the jackknife and bootstrap procedures, Psychological Bulletin, 116, pp. 498-508, (1994); Dertouzos L., Communications, computers and networks, Computers in Society, pp. 6-12, (1991); Dologite D.G., Measuring microcomputer literacy, Journal of Education Technology Systems, 16, pp. 29-43, (1987); Furste-Bowe J., Boger C., Franklin T., McIntyre B., Polansky J., Schlough S., Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28, pp. 175-188, (1995); Telecommunications: Characteristics and Choices of Internet Users, (2001); Hawkins R., Paris A.E., Computer literacy and computer use among college students: Differences in black and white, Journal of Negro Education, 66, pp. 147-158, (1997); Hemby K.V., The impact of keyboarding on computer anxiety in end users, Office Systems Research Journal, 17, pp. 9-18, (1999); Karsten R., Roth R.M., The relationship of computer experience and computer self-efficacy to performance in introductory computer literacy courses, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31, pp. 14-24, (1998); Larson J., Smith M.A., An assessment of the computer literacy and computer attitudes of incoming first-year students at the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, Proceedings of Selected Research and Development Presentations, 1994 National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, pp. 357-366, (1994); Lee D.M.S., Pliskin N., Kahn B., The relationship between performance in a computer literacy course and students' prior achievement and knowledge, Journal of Computing Research, 10, pp. 63-77, (1994); Malaney G.D., Thurman Q., Key factors in the use and frequency of use of microcomputers by college students, Journal of Education Technology Systems, 18, pp. 151-160, (1989); Maurer M.M., Computer anxiety: Correlated and what they tell us: A literature review, Computers in Human Behaviors, 10, pp. 369-376, (1994); McPherson B., An analysis of personality types and computer anxiety among students enrolled in microbased computer literacy, Office Systems Research Journal, 16, pp. 21-31, (1998); Meier S.T., Predicting individual differences in performance on computer-administered tests and tasks: Development of the Computer Aversion Scale, Computers in Human Behavior, 4, pp. 175-187, (1988); Meier S.T., Construct validity of an instrument designed to measure computer aversion, 1990 Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, (1990); Morris D.C., Ownership, use, and non-use of personal computers by older adults, Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 25, pp. 5-12, (1996); Nunnaly J., Psychometric Theory, (1978); Oetting E.R., Oetting's Computer Anxiety Scale (COMPAS), (1983); Peterson T., Business week, Business Week, (1995); Rainie L., More Online, Doing More, (2001); Schellenberg K., Computers in Society, (1994); Stevens J., Ed.), (1992); Silva A.P.D., Stam A., Discriminant analysis, Reading and Understanding Multivariate Statistics, pp. 277-318, (1995); Tabachnick B.G., Fidell L.S., Ed.), (1992); Wilkinson L., Systat (Version 9.0), (1998)
Informing Science Institute
Review
All Open Access; Bronze Open Access; Green Open Access
Scopus