CHI TIẾT NGHIÊN CỨU …

Tiêu đề

How does schema theory apply to real versus virtual memories?

Tác giả

Flannery K.A.; Walles R.

Năm xuất bản

2003

Source title

Cyberpsychology and Behavior

Số trích dẫn

DOI

10.1089/109493103321640347

Liên kết

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0037967321&doi=10.1089%2f109493103321640347&partnerID=40&md5=e5227f04c61a8c1ad5af4a6ec5d95f67

Tóm tắt

Schemas are cognitive frameworks that guide memory, aide in the interpretation of events, and influence how we retrieve stored memories1. The purpose of this study was to explore how schemas operate in a well-known environment and to examine whether or not schemas operate differently in real versus virtual environments. Twenty-four undergraduate students from a small liberal arts college in the northeast participated for course credit. Two identical offices (a real office and a virtual office) were created and filled with eight consistent and eight inconsistent items. Each participant explored either the real office or the virtual office for 20 seconds without any knowledge that their memory would be tested. After leaving the office, participants completed a recognition task and a short demographic questionnaire. Overall sensitivity and higher confidence in recognition memory scores was found for inconsistent compared to consistent items. Greater support for the consistency effect was observed in this study and interpreted in terms of the dynamic memory model2, 3 and the schema-plus-correction model4. The results also demonstrate that virtual reality paradigms may produce similar outcomes compared to the real world in terms of some memory processes, but additional design factors must be considered if the researcher's goal is to create equivalent paradigms.

Từ khóa

Tài liệu tham khảo

Lampinen J., Copeland S., Neuschatz J., Recollections of things schematic: Room schemas revisisted, Cognition, 27, pp. 1211-1222, (2001); Schank R.C., Dynamic Memory: A Theory or Reminding and Learning Computers and People, (1982); Schank R.C., Dynamic Memory Revisisted, (1999); Graesser A.C., Gordon S.E., Sawyer J.D., Recognition memory for typical and atypical actions in scripted activities. Tests of script pointer and tag hypothesis, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, pp. 319-332, (1979); Brewer W., Treyens J., Role of schemata in memory for places, Cognitive Psychology, 13, pp. 207-230, (1981); Loftus G., Mackworth N., Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing, Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, pp. 565-572, (1978); Pezdek K., Whetsone T., Reynolds K., Et al., Memory for real-world scenes. The role of consistency with schema expectation, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, pp. 587-595, (1989); Pichert J.W., Anderson R.C., Taking a different perspectives on a story, Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, pp. 309-315, (1977); Koffka K., Principles of Gestalt Psychology, (1935); Srull T.K., Lichentenstein M., Rothbart M., Associative storage and retrieval processes in person memory, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, pp. 316-345, (1985); Hastie R., Memory for behavioral information that confirms or contradicts a personality impression, Person Memory: The Cognitive Basis of Social Perception, pp. 155-177, (1980); Goodman G.S., Picture memory: How the action schema affects retention, Cognitive Psychology, 12, pp. 473-495, (1980); Hock H.S., Romanski L., Galie A., Et al., Real-world schemata and scene recognition in adults and children, Memory and Cognition, 6, pp. 423-431, (1978); Rojahn K., Pettigrew T., Memory for schema-relevant information: A meta-analytic resolution, British Journal of Social Psychology, 31, pp. 81-109, (1992); Saab Z., Trottier J., Wall H., Memory for places: Role of schemata-related expectancy and saliency in recall and recognition, Psychological Reports, 54, pp. 607-610, (1984); Hoffman H., Virtual reality: A new tool for interdisciplinary psychology research, Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 1, pp. 195-200, (1998); Wilson P., Active exploration of a virtual environment does not promote orientation or memory for objects, Environment and Behavior, 31, pp. 752-763, (1999); Gamberini L., Virtual reality as a new research tool for the study of human memory, Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 3, pp. 337-342, (2000); Gaunet F., Vidal M., Kemeny A., Et al., Active, passive and snapshot exploration in a virtual environment: Influence on scene memory, reorientation and path memory, Cognitive Brain Research, 11, pp. 409-420, (2001); Mania K., Chalmers A., The effects of levels of immersion on memory and presence in virtual environments: A reality centered approach, Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 4, pp. 247-264, (2001); Pugnetti L., Mendozzi L., Attree E., Et al., Probing memory and executive functions with virtual reality: Past and present studies, Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 1, pp. 151-161, (1998); Hoffman H., Garcia-Palacios A., Thomas A., Et al., Virtual reality monitoring: Phenomenal characteristics of real, virtual, and false memories, Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 4, pp. 565-572, (2001); Bartlett F.C., Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology, (1932); Banks W.P., Signal detection theory and human memory, Psychological Bulletin, 74, pp. 81-99, (1970); Reyna V.F., Brainerd C.J., Fuzzy-trace theory: An interim synthesis, Learning and Individual Differences, 7, pp. 1-75, (1995); Israel L., Schacter D.L., Pictorial encoding reduces false recognition of semantic associates, Psychnomic Bulletin and Review, 4, pp. 577-581, (1997); Schacter D.L., Israel L., Racine C., Supressing false recognition in younger and older adults: The distinctiveness heuristic, Journal of Memory & Language, 40, pp. 1-24, (1999); Wilson P., Foreman N., Tlauka M., Transfer of spatial information from a virtual to a real environment, Human Factors, pp. 39-531, (1997); Friedman A., Framing pictures: The role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, pp. 316-355, (1979); Bower G.H., Black J.B., Turner T.J., Scripts in memory for text, Cognitive Psychology, 11, pp. 177-220, (1979); McComas J., Pivik J., LaFlamme M., Children's transfer of spatial learning from virtual reality to real environments, Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 1, pp. 121-128, (1998); Richardson A., Montello D., Hegarty M., Spatial knowledge acquisition from maps and from navigation in the real and virtual environments, Memory and Cognition, 27, pp. 741-750, (1999); Brooks B., Attree E., Rose F., Et al., The specificity of memory enhancement during interaction with a virtual environment, Memory, 7, pp. 65-68, (1999); Rizzo A., Buckwalter J., Bowerly M., Et al., The virtual classroom: A virtual reality environment for the assessment and rehabilitation of attention deficitis, Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 3, pp. 483-499, (2000); Roegge C.S., Seo B.W., Crofton K.M., Et al., Gestational-lactational exposure to aroclor 1254 impairs radial-arm maze performance in male rates, Toxicological Sciences, 57, pp. 121-130, (2000)